Define publicKeyJwk

[OR13]

create security-v3-unstable.jsonld

add definition for publicKeyJwk

[msporny]

Blocked by discussion about JsonWebKey2020/JwkVerificationKey2020... we need to resolve this to pull in this example.

[OR13]

Will update the name, if the name changes... all of the examples in this repo need a refresh.

[msporny]

We need to resolve the JsonWebKey2020 discussion to pull this in.

[OR13]

@msporny @kdenhartog I believe we may have a special topic call which would allow for us to address this in the DID WG... its the same topic call that will address:

• Supported ciphers in a DID document w3c/did-core#185

[kdenhartog]

@msporny @kdenhartog I believe we may have a special topic call which would allow for us to address this in the DID WG... its the same topic call that will address:

* [w3c/did-core#185](https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/185)

@OR13 I haven't seen a topic call for that come up yet, but may have missed it. Do you know what day it is or is it still TBD and I should keep my eye out for it? Found it

[OR13]

Just putting this out there: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/dev-guide/windows-integration/web-authentication

attestationObject = cbor.decodeFirstSync(Buffer.from(attestation.attestationObject, 'base64'));
    authenticatorData = parseAuthenticatorData(attestationObject.authData);
    var credential = await storage.Credentials.create({
        id: authenticatorData.attestedCredentialData.credentialId.toString('base64'),
        publicKeyJwk: authenticatorData.attestedCredentialData.publicKeyJwk,
        signCount: authenticatorData.signCount
    });

[OR13]

@msporny what can I do to unblock this?

[peacekeeper]

Related to the transform-keys DID parameter: https://w3c.github.io/did-spec-registries/#transform-keys-0

[OR13]

@msporny @dlongley I believe we settled this. note that this is still the "unstable context"... please review again.

Please review again, I think we had no issue with this property, only the values for vm types.

[OR13]

@msporny as you are currently the only code owner, i am awaiting your review.

[msporny]

LGTM (with all of the caveats that we're currently discussing this and it may change, etc.)