Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove browser icons... #152

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2019
Merged

Remove browser icons... #152

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2019

Conversation

marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

Seeing the browser icons makes it look like everyone is implementing. That's clearly not the case.

Seeing the  browser icons makes it look like everyone is implementing. That's clearly not the case.
Copy link
Member

@mounirlamouri mounirlamouri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will leave it to @beaufortfrancois but leaving some comments as I don't think the statuses are quite correct.

@@ -32,13 +30,18 @@ Tip: Chrome channel releases are tracked at [https://googlechromelabs.github.io/
* [Issue 854935](http://crbug.com/854935): Closed captions in Picture-in-Picture are not supported.

# Microsoft Edge
https://dev.windows.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/platform/status/pictureinpicture
Under consideration.
https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/platform/status/pictureinpicture/
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Edgium has the feature.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MarionDaly, can you confirm? Edge planning to ship this too?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Edge Canary channel has Picture-in-Picture API enabled as you can see.
image

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI I've opened #153


# Safari
No public signals.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My understanding is that Safari is supportive and has their own private API.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, do they expose some webkitThing. thing?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I think it's something like video.webkitSetPresentationMode("picture-in-picture").

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Neat, I had no idea.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2018/10/watch-video-using-picture-in-picture#background,

In September 2016, Safari added Picture-in-Picture support through a WebKit API in macOS Sierra. Six months later, Chrome automatically played Picture-in-Picture video on mobile with the release of Android O using a native Android API. Six months later, we announced our intent to build and standardize a Web API, feature compatible with Safari’s, that would allow web developers to create and control the full experience around Picture-in-Picture. And here we are!

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Moreover, they're accepting patches for review: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189848#c8

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, nice. This is encouraging!

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI I've pushed #154

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182688

# Firefox
No public signals.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would say there was a lot of public signals ^_^

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heh, our official(tm) position is to “defer”:
mozilla/standards-positions#72

That doesn’t mean we wont do it, just not right now.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI I've opened #155

Copy link
Member Author

@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres Jul 15, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So, Mozilla is happy for you all to figure out the spec details, tests, etc. Can you please ping me when you think the spec is CR ready and it’s in Safari Tech Preview? I think then might be a good time to re-evaluate adding the API. Given that we have PiP working, adding the DOM bits should be fairly trivial (famous last words).

@beaufortfrancois beaufortfrancois merged commit 6c12f4e into master Jul 15, 2019
@beaufortfrancois
Copy link
Collaborator

I'll merge this PR for now and will start a PR for updating browsers vendor status.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants