-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove browser icons... #152
Conversation
Seeing the browser icons makes it look like everyone is implementing. That's clearly not the case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will leave it to @beaufortfrancois but leaving some comments as I don't think the statuses are quite correct.
@@ -32,13 +30,18 @@ Tip: Chrome channel releases are tracked at [https://googlechromelabs.github.io/ | |||
* [Issue 854935](http://crbug.com/854935): Closed captions in Picture-in-Picture are not supported. | |||
|
|||
# Microsoft Edge | |||
https://dev.windows.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/platform/status/pictureinpicture | |||
Under consideration. | |||
https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/platform/status/pictureinpicture/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Edgium has the feature.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@MarionDaly, can you confirm? Edge planning to ship this too?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI I've opened #153
|
||
# Safari | ||
No public signals. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My understanding is that Safari is supportive and has their own private API.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, do they expose some webkitThing.
thing?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I think it's something like video.webkitSetPresentationMode("picture-in-picture")
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Neat, I had no idea.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2018/10/watch-video-using-picture-in-picture#background,
In September 2016, Safari added Picture-in-Picture support through a WebKit API in macOS Sierra. Six months later, Chrome automatically played Picture-in-Picture video on mobile with the release of Android O using a native Android API. Six months later, we announced our intent to build and standardize a Web API, feature compatible with Safari’s, that would allow web developers to create and control the full experience around Picture-in-Picture. And here we are!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Moreover, they're accepting patches for review: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189848#c8
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, nice. This is encouraging!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI I've pushed #154
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182688 | ||
|
||
# Firefox | ||
No public signals. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would say there was a lot of public signals ^_^
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Heh, our official(tm) position is to “defer”:
mozilla/standards-positions#72
That doesn’t mean we wont do it, just not right now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI I've opened #155
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, Mozilla is happy for you all to figure out the spec details, tests, etc. Can you please ping me when you think the spec is CR ready and it’s in Safari Tech Preview? I think then might be a good time to re-evaluate adding the API. Given that we have PiP working, adding the DOM bits should be fairly trivial (famous last words).
I'll merge this PR for now and will start a PR for updating browsers vendor status. |
Seeing the browser icons makes it look like everyone is implementing. That's clearly not the case.