Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add rdf:dirLangString, rdf:reifies, rdf:Proposition, and modify rdf:JSON #31

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

domel
Copy link
Contributor

@domel domel commented Dec 17, 2024

This PR updates http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#. It modifies the Turtle file and changes from v1.1 to v1.2.

Added

  • rdf:dirLangString
  • rdf:reifies,
  • rdf:Proposition

Modified

  • rdf:JSON

@domel domel added the spec:substantive Issue or proposed change in the spec that changes its normative content label Dec 17, 2024
Copy link

@niklasl niklasl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good.

I presume we're making this repository the official source of this vocabulary? If this is correct I gladly welcome it.

I just have one wish for that: to first commit the original (the turtle as served on the official IRI), and then commit these changes upon that. To make it clear exactly what we're adding/changing. (I.e. do a rebase so this change is shown as a distinct commit (or commits).)

(Also adding the rdfs: source as rdfs.ttl seems appropriate?)

@gkellogg
Copy link
Member

I agree with @niklasl that we should start with a base which is based on the RDF 1.1 version of the RDF Vocabulary (and the RDFS Vocabulary, as well). We might also consider providing the namespace documents in different formats: The JSON-LD Namespace files generate Turtle, JSON-LD, and HTML versions of the JSON-LD vocabulary, and we could similarly do that for the RDF(S) vocabularies.

I would put rdf.ttl in an "ns" sub-directory, along with rdfs.ttl.

@niklasl
Copy link

niklasl commented Dec 18, 2024

Can this be on hold until #33 is merged, and then rebased upon that?

@domel
Copy link
Contributor Author

domel commented Dec 18, 2024

@niklasl I closed this one temporarily. When ns directory will be merged I will create a new PR only with rdf:dirLangString, rdf:reifies, rdf:Proposition, rdf:JSON

@domel domel closed this Dec 18, 2024
@niklasl
Copy link

niklasl commented Dec 18, 2024

@domel Sounds great; thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
spec:substantive Issue or proposed change in the spec that changes its normative content
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants