Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 20, 2024. It is now read-only.

make use of DNS throughout the documentation #471

Closed
rade opened this issue Mar 19, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

make use of DNS throughout the documentation #471

rade opened this issue Mar 19, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@rade
Copy link
Member

rade commented Mar 19, 2015

ATM the weaveDNS documentation is completely separate from the main documentation, with just the odd reference to it from the latter. This was desirable when weaveDNS was new and experimental, but now it actually hinders adoption.

The weave 1.0 walkthrough in #242 presents a much more integrated view of weaveDNS, and hence can serve as guidance for this issue, though we won't be able to go quite as far until a few more features have landed.

@rade rade added the chore label Mar 19, 2015
@fintanr fintanr self-assigned this Apr 20, 2015
@rade
Copy link
Member Author

rade commented May 12, 2015

What is happening with this?

@rade rade modified the milestone: 0.11.0 May 12, 2015
@rade
Copy link
Member Author

rade commented May 12, 2015

I've just noticed that our main docs page does not mention WeaveDNS at all!

@errordeveloper
Copy link
Contributor

@rade I believe this should still be open, as you said.

@rade rade modified the milestones: 0.11.0, next May 26, 2015
@rade
Copy link
Member Author

rade commented Jun 8, 2015

Where we want to get to here is that pretty much all our examples in the docs use names instead of IP addresses for addressing containers.

Ideally we want to tackle this after #383, #749, #750, #762, #763.

It is also related to #869.

We will still want to keep a dedicated piece of weaveDNS documentation, to cover all the various exotic uses, troubleshooting, etc.

@rade rade changed the title [dns] merge docs into main documentation make use of DNS throughout the documentation Jun 12, 2015
@awh awh self-assigned this Jun 12, 2015
@awh awh closed this as completed in #948 Jun 18, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants