Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure that the 'address' member remains null in RTCIceCandidateStats for remote prflx candidates #13922

Conversation

youennf
Copy link
Contributor

@youennf youennf commented Nov 5, 2018

No description provided.

@wpt-pr-bot wpt-pr-bot requested a review from jan-ivar December 6, 2018 16:17
Copy link
Member

@jan-ivar jan-ivar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some comments (they apply twice).


localPc.addEventListener('icecandidate', event => {
if (event.candidate)
remotePc.addIceCandidate(event.candidate);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip: There's already an (imperfect) exchangeIceCandidates() helper for this. Maybe we could fix it and use that instead?

This also reminded me to open w3c/webrtc-pc#2039.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We probably could, but PR is not landed and test is already written so I would prefer just landing it as is for now.

webrtc-stats/getStats-remote-candidate-address.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@youennf youennf changed the title Ensure that the 'address' member remains undefined in RTCIceCandidateStats for remote prflx candidates Ensure that the 'address' member remains null in RTCIceCandidateStats for remote prflx candidates Dec 12, 2018
@youennf
Copy link
Contributor Author

youennf commented Dec 19, 2018

ping review.

@foolip
Copy link
Member

foolip commented Dec 20, 2018

This PR is blocked on the required "Travis CI - Pull Request" check after #14499. In order to trigger it, I will close and reopen this PR.

@foolip foolip closed this Dec 20, 2018
@foolip foolip reopened this Dec 20, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants