Expose ProgressEvent to ServiceWorker

[Rashika101]

Fixes #305
"Expose ProgressEvent to ServiceWorker"

• At least two implementers are interested (and none opposed):
  • "Gecko"
  • "WebKit"
• Tests are written and can be reviewed and commented upon at:
  • Tested through IDL.
• Implementation bugs are filed:
  • Chrome: N/A
  • Firefox: N/A
  • Safari: N/A

(See WHATWG Working Mode: Changes for more details.)

---

Preview | Diff

[saschanaz]

Hey, thanks, the patch looks perfect! A few nits for the description, could you:

• Modify the title to "Expose ProgressEvent to ServiceWorker" to show the intention of this patch?
• Remove a space in [x ] so that it can be [x]. You'll see it magically becoming a checkbox!
• Add Fixes #305 at the top line. Doing so will show this patch in the issue so that other's won't duplicate your work 😉

[Rashika101]

Is that okay?
Yes,The checkbox has been created..
But in 1st point title modification what is that?Isn't similar?

[saschanaz]

You'll see the Edit button next to the Open with button, please click it and you can edit the title 😊

[saschanaz]

BTW, you need to sign the Participation Agreement for your contribution, please go here and do the required steps. Sorry for the unexpected paperwork 😬

[saschanaz]

After that, during workdays someone will review this once more and merge it. Thank you for your hard work 😍

[Rashika101]

Thank you
@saschanaz Modified the title!!
Explain a little more on participation agreement ,what are the steps i need to take in that agreement...
When I am submitting ,"Invalid entity name name " is coming..

[saschanaz]

Entity name? I think you are supposed to fill only the "If signing as an Individual" form 👀 (unless you are doing this as a part of your job).

[saschanaz]

And thank you for setting the right title! It would be even better without the quotes.

[Rashika101]

Thank You @saschanaz
Quotes removed...
Signed the Participation agreement.
When my PR will merge?
and still my participation showing pending..

[saschanaz]

Per this page it needs to be verified by the admins, which will happen probably next week. Hold tight 😉

[annevk]

Thanks! Could you change this to Window,Worker instead? Worker is a shorthand for all three and we generally use that when applicable.

[annevk]

Also, you should feel free to add your name to the Acknowledgments section.

[Rashika101]

@annevk
Is there any changes i have to make?

[Rashika101]

@saschanaz Thank You for your guidance!!
Is there any thing else that i have to do?

[annevk]

@Rashika101 yeah, instead of Window,DedicatedWorker,SharedWorker,ServiceWorker you want Window,Worker. And you can also add your name to the Acknowledgments section at the bottom of the document if you wish.

[saschanaz]

To reduce confusion: Worker is a shorter equivalent of DedicatedWorker,SharedWorker,ServiceWorker. We want to make the code short as possible to make it more manageable, and thus [Exposed=(Window,Worker)] is preferred here. Sorry for confusing you 🙏

Feel free to ping me when you need any more help 💕

[Rashika101]

@saschanaz @annevk
I did the changes as per your guidance. A new patch and pull request has been created...
Did I had done it correctly? Please recheck it.
Thanks!

[saschanaz]

Hmm, you don't have to create new patch, you can edit existing patch by Files changed -> "..." button (next to xhr.bs) -> Edit file. But that also works 👀

[Rashika101]

Should I do it again now in this patch?
As you say...

[saschanaz]

I'd say please give it a try 😁

[Rashika101]

Done.....Is that visible?

[saschanaz]

Yup, perfectly splendid!

[Rashika101]

Thank You...Any change required in title?

[saschanaz]

No, the patch still does the same work, just in a shorter way 😀

BTW, have you considered adding your name to Acknowledgments? We totally want to list the contributors who gave valuable patch(es) and you also deserve it! It's not a requirement, so feel free to ignore it.

[Rashika101]

Yes, i want to add name...How to do that?

[saschanaz]

It's same, in the same file search "Acknowledgments" and you'll see several names ordered in alphabetical way. Please add your name there 😉

[Rashika101]

Excuse me.....feeling stupid
Didn't get acknowledgement...

[saschanaz]

Oh, it's "Acknowledgments" (it lacks "e" between "legd" and "ments", English is weird 😄)

[Rashika101]

Sorry.....
Where do I search it?

[saschanaz]

In the xhr.bs file, the one you just edited. Make sure you tap Control+F (Or Command+F if you are on macOS) after you click the text editor or you won't see anything.

[saschanaz]

Oh I mean,

1. Files changed -> "..." button (next to xhr.bs) -> Edit file
2. Search "Ackno" (by Control+F or Command+F)
3. Add your name, in the alphabetical order 😉

[Rashika101]

I did it in the same way. But nothing happens.

[saschanaz]

Could you explain what you saw on the screen when you tried it? Did you fail to find the names?

[Rashika101]

When I search "Ackno" nothing comes up..

[saschanaz]

Did you click the text editor before searching? It works in a bit weird way, it may not come up if you didn't.

(It's sad that we couldn't ship FindText API to make this straightforward.)

[Rashika101]

Is there any other way to do so?
I am trying but nothing happens.

[saschanaz]

Hmm, alternatively you can just scroll down to line number 1911 (the number you see at the left of the text editor) and it's there.

[Rashika101]

Oh,Thank You so much.
I did it.
Anything else i need to do.

[saschanaz]

Good! Could you move your name before Robin Berjon so that the list can be alphabetically ordered? (so that Rashika comes before Robin)

[Rashika101]

Oh excuse me.
Done.

[saschanaz]

Okay, now everything is perfect and we can just wait for the verification for your participation form. Thank you! 🎉🎉

[Rashika101]

Thank you. Until we can work on other issues.?

[saschanaz]

I guess no good first issue anymore in this repository. I think issues in whatwg generally require some knowledge of web standards than others (this one was luckily exceptional 😁) , so you may want to try other repositories too. @annevk may have some thought, though.

[annevk]

Thanks! I looked through some of the remaining good first issues within the WHATWG and it seems they require a bit more experience indeed.