Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add command.repeatdly(int count) to both java and c++ #6589
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add command.repeatdly(int count) to both java and c++ #6589
Changes from all commits
59b072c
da6c11b
eb91b21
faf08c2
07bb16e
9fec4bc
f31b58c
d968cb3
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should either make Java match C++ or C++ match Java. (I don't have a particularly strong preference on which one)
This also applies to the CommandPtr doc comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This would mean we would neet to also change the documentation on the
.repeating()
function.IMO, it would be better if this PR didn't have any line removals
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How so? I'm just talking about changing the
repeatedly(int)
doc comments.Also, the wording that would most match the
repeatedly()
doc comment (in both Java and C++) is "Decorates this command to run repeatedly, restarting it when it ends, until this command is run the specified number of times or is interrupted. The decorated command can still be canceled."There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This matches Java and is more useful than the current check.
There's also a few more small changes- Make sure to read the whole comment.