函数式编程：抽象与组合

TODO1/abstraction-composition.md

@@ -2,109 +2,109 @@
 > * 原文作者：[Eric Elliott](https://medium.com/@_ericelliott?source=post_header_lockup)
 > * 译文出自：[掘金翻译计划](https://github.com/xitu/gold-miner)
 > * 本文永久链接：[https://github.com/xitu/gold-miner/blob/master/TODO1/abstraction-composition.md](https://github.com/xitu/gold-miner/blob/master/TODO1/abstraction-composition.md)
-> * 译者：
-> * 校对者：
+> * 译者：Xekin-FE(https://github.com/Xekin-FE)
+> * 校对者：[weibinzhu](https://github.com/weibinzhu) [Junkai Liu](https://github.com/Moonliujk)
 
-# Abstraction & Composition
+# 函数式编程：抽象与组合
 
 ![](https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*uVpU7iruzXafhU2VLeH4lw.jpeg)
 
 Smoke Art Cubes to Smoke — MattysFlicks — (CC BY 2.0)
 
-> Note: This is part of the “Composing Software” series on learning functional programming and compositional software techniques in JavaScript ES6+ from the ground up. Stay tuned. There’s a lot more of this to come!  
-> [< Previous](https://github.com/xitu/gold-miner/blob/master/TODO/nested-ternaries-are-great.md) | [<< Start over at Part 1](https://github.com/xitu/gold-miner/blob/master/TODO1/composing-software-an-introduction.md) | [Next >](https://github.com/xitu/gold-miner/blob/master/TODO1/the-forgotten-history-of-oop.md)
+> 备注：本篇本章是“组合式软件编程”中的一部分，从底层开始学习 JavaScript ES6+ 的函数式编程和组合软件技术。更多的内容请保持关注我们。
+> [< 上一章节](https://github.com/xitu/gold-miner/blob/master/TODO/nested-ternaries-are-great.md) | [<< 返回第一章节](https://github.com/xitu/gold-miner/blob/master/TODO1/composing-software-an-introduction.md) | [下一章节 >](https://github.com/xitu/gold-miner/blob/master/TODO1/the-forgotten-history-of-oop.md)
 
-The more I mature in software development, the more I value the fundamentals — insights that seemed trivial when I was a beginner, but now hold profound significance with the benefit of experience.
+随着我在程序开发中愈加成熟，我愈加重视底层的原理 —— 这是在我还是个初学者时所被我所忽视的，但现在随着开发经验越来越丰富，这些基础的原理也具有了深厚的意义。
 
-> “In the martial art of Karate […] the symbol of pride for a black belt is to wear it long enough such that the dye fades to white as to symbolize returning to the beginner state.” ~ John Maeda, [“The Laws of Simplicity: Design, Technology, Business, Life”](https://www.amazon.com/Laws-Simplicity-Design-Technology-Business/dp/0262134721/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&qid=1516330765&sr=8-1&keywords=the+laws+of+simplicity&linkCode=ll1&tag=eejs-20&linkId=287b1d3357fa799ce7563584e098c5d8)
+> “在空手道中，黑带的骄傲象征是从黑带穿到褪色而变为白带，这象征着回到了最初的状态” ~ John Maeda，[“简化的法则：设计，技术，商业，生活”](https://www.amazon.com/Laws-Simplicity-Design-Technology-Business/dp/0262134721/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&qid=1516330765&sr=8-1&keywords=the+laws+of+simplicity&linkCode=ll1&tag=eejs-20&linkId=287b1d3357fa799ce7563584e098c5d8)
 
-Abstraction is “the process of considering something independently of its associations, attributes, or concrete accompaniments,” according to Google dictionary.
+在 Google 词典中写着，抽象是“独立于事物的关联、属性或具体附属物来考虑事物的过程”。
 
-The word abstraction comes from the latin verb _abstrahere_, which means “to draw away”. I like this insight. Abstraction is about removing things — but what are we removing, and to what end?
+抽象的词源来自中世纪拉丁语 **abstractus**，意为“拽开、抽离”。我喜欢这样的解读。抽象意味着移除某些东西 —— 但到底我们移除掉了什么，又为了什么目的呢？
 
-Sometimes I like to translate words into other languages and then translate them back to English to get a sense of other associations we don’t commonly think about in English. When I translate “abstraction” into Yiddish and back, the result is “absentminded”. I like this, too. An absentminded person is running on autopilot, not actively thinking about what they’re doing… just doing it.
+有时我喜欢将词汇翻译成其他语言然后再把它们翻译回英文，站在不同的角度去思考我们在英语中没有想到过的其他联想。当我把“抽象”一词翻译为意第绪语再翻译回英语时，结果意思是“心不在焉的”，我也喜欢这样的答案。一个心不在焉的人在使用自动驾驶仪的时候，不会去主动思考驾驶仪在做什么……只是这样做。
 
-Abstraction lets us run on autopilot, safely. All software is automation. Given enough time, anything you do on a computer, you could do with paper, ink, and carrier pigeons. Software just takes care of all the little details that would be too time consuming to do manually.
+抽象让我们得以安全的使用自动驾驶仪。所有软件都是自动化的。如果你有足够的时间，你在电脑上做的任何事情也都可以用纸，墨水，再加上信鸽来做。软件就只是把这些手动做起来十分耗时的所有细节自动化处理了。
 
-All software is abstraction, hiding away all the hard work and mindless details while we reap the benefits.
+所有软件都是抽象的，在我们获利的同时，也将所有的辛勤工作以及那些无意识的细节埋藏。
 
-A lot of software processes get repeated again and again. If, during the problem decomposition stage, we decided to reimplement the repeated stuff over and over again, that would require a lot of unnecessary work. It would be silly at the very least. In many cases, it would be impractical.
+软件的运行过程大多都是不停的重复着。如果在问题分解阶段，我们决定一遍又一遍地重复实现相同的功能，将会造成大量不必要的工作。至少这样做肯定是愚蠢的。在许多情况下，这都是不切实际的。
 
-Instead, we remove duplication by writing a component of some kind (a function, module, class, etc…), giving it a name (identity), and reusing it as many times as we like.
+相反，我们可以通过编写一些对应的组件（像是函数、模块、类等等），再给个名称作为标识，然后我们就可以在需要使用它们的地方再去复用它们。
 
-The process of decomposition is the process of abstraction. Successful abstraction implies that the result is a set of independently useful and recomposable components. From this we get an important principle of software architecture:
+分解的过程就是抽象的过程。成功的抽象也就意味着结果是一组可以单独使用并且也可以重新组合的组件。由此我们了解了一个非常重要的软件架构原则：
 
-Software solutions should be decomposable into their component parts, and recomposable into new solutions, without changing the internal component implementation details.
+软件解决方案应该可以被分解为其组件部分，并且可以重新组合成为新的解决方案，而无需更改内部的组件实现细节。
 
-### Abstraction is the act of simplification
+### 抽象是一种简化的行为
 
-> “Simplicity is about subtracting the obvious and adding the meaningful.” ~ John Maeda, [“The Laws of Simplicity: Design, Technology, Business, Life”](https://www.amazon.com/Laws-Simplicity-Design-Technology-Business/dp/0262134721/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&qid=1516330765&sr=8-1&keywords=the+laws+of+simplicity&linkCode=ll1&tag=eejs-20&linkId=287b1d3357fa799ce7563584e098c5d8)
+> “简化就是将显而易见的东西减去并增添有意义的东西” ~ John Maeda，[“简化的法则：设计，技术，商业，生活”](https://www.amazon.com/Laws-Simplicity-Design-Technology-Business/dp/0262134721/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&qid=1516330765&sr=8-1&keywords=the+laws+of+simplicity&linkCode=ll1&tag=eejs-20&linkId=287b1d3357fa799ce7563584e098c5d8)
 
-The process of abstraction has two main components:
+抽象过程主要有两个组成部分：
 
-*   **Generalization** is the process of finding _similarities_ (the obvious) in repeated patterns, and hiding the similarities behind an abstraction.
-*   **Specialization** is the process of using the abstraction, supplying _only what is different_ (the meaningful) for each use case.
+*   **泛化**是在重复模式中找到相似的（并显而易见的）功能并通过抽象来将它们隐藏的一个过程。
+*   **特殊化**是在使用抽象时，为那些**只在某处不同**（且有其特殊意义的）提供用例。
 
-Abstraction is the process of extracting the underlying essence of a concept. By exploring common ground between different problems from different domains, we learn how to step outside our headspace for a moment and see a problem from a different perspective. When we see the essence of a problem, we find that a good solution may apply to many other problems. If we code the solution well, we can radically reduce the complexity of our application.
+抽象是一个提取概念本质的过程。通过发现不同领域中不同问题的共同点，我们可以认识到如果跨出自己的视界从不同的角度去看待问题。当我们看到问题的本质时，我们就可以找出一个好的解决方案同时它也可以适用于许多其他问题。如果我们将这样的思想应用在代码上，我们就可以从根本上降低应用程序的复杂性。
 
-> “If you touch one thing with deep awareness, you touch everything.” ~ Thich Nhat Hanh
+> “如果你愿意触碰事物的深层基础，你将触碰到它的一切。” ~ Thich Nhat Hanh
 
-This principle can be used to radically reduce the code required to build an application.
+此原则可用于从根本上减少构建应用程序所需的代码。
 
-### Abstraction in Software
+### 软件中的抽象
 
-Abstraction in software takes many forms:
+软件中的抽象有很多种形式
 
-*   Algorithms
-*   Data structures
-*   Modules
-*   Classes
-*   Frameworks
+*   算法
+*   数据解构
+*   模块
+*   类
+*   框架
 
-And my personal favorite:
+而我个人最喜欢的是：
 
-> “Sometimes, the elegant implementation is just a function. Not a method. Not a class. Not a framework. Just a function.” ~ John Carmack (Id Software, Oculus VR)
+> “有时，优雅的实现仅仅是一个函数。而不是一种方法。也不是类。也不是框架。只是一个函数而已。” ~ John Carmack (Id Software, Oculus VR)
 
-Functions make great abstractions because they possess the qualities that are essential for a good abstraction:
+函数具有很好的抽象性，因为它们本身具有良好抽象所具备的特性：
 
-*   **Identity** — The ability to assign a name to it and reuse it in different contexts.
-*   **Composition** — The ability to compose simple functions to form more complex functions.
+*   **标识性** — 为其分配名称并在不同的上下文当中重复使用。
+*   **可组合性** — 可以让简单的功能组合成更复杂的功能。
 
-### Abstraction through composition
+### 组合抽象
 
-The most useful functions for abstraction in software are _pure functions_, which share modular characteristics with functions from math. In math, a function given the same inputs will always return the same output. It’s possible to see functions as relations between inputs and outputs. Given some input `A`, a function `f` will produce `B` as output. You could say that `f` defines a relationship between `A` and `B`:
+在软件中最常用于抽象的函数莫过于**纯函数**，它与数学中的函数有着相同的模块化特征。在数学中，一个函数对于相同的输入值，永远会得到相同的输出。我们可以将函数视为输入和输出之间的关系。给定一些输入 `A`，一个函数 `f` 将会产生 `B` 作为输出。你可以说是 `f` 定义了 `A` 和 `B` 之间的关系：
 
 ```
 f: A -> B
 ```
 
-Likewise, we could define another function, `g`, which defines a relationship between `B` and `C`:
+同样的，我们可以定义另一个函数，`g`，它则定义了 `B` 和 `C` 之间的关系：
 
 ```
 g: B -> C
 ```
 
-This _implies_ another function `h` which defines a relationship directly from `A` to `C`:
+这**意味着**另一个函数 `h` 就直接定义了 `A` 和 `C` 之间的联系：
 
 ```
 h: A -> C
 ```
 
-Those relationships form the structure of the problem space, and the way you compose functions in your application forms the structure of your application.
+这些关系构成了问题空间的结构，也由此你在应用程序中组合函数的方式也就构成了应用程序的结构。
 
-Good abstractions simplify by hiding structure, the same way `h` reduces `A -> B -> C` down to `A -> C`.
+将这些结构隐藏起来，一个良好的抽象就诞生了，同样的方式我们使用 `h` 这个方法就可以将 `A -> B -> C` 这个过程缩减为 `A -> C`。
 
 ![](https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*uFTKDgI0kT878E97K14V1A.png)
 
-### How to do More with Less Code
+### 如何用更少的代码做更多的事情
 
-Abstraction is the key to doing more with less code. For example, imagine you have a function which simply adds two numbers:
+抽象是用更少代码做更多事的关键。举个例子，假如你写一个函数用来计算两个数字相加：
 
 ```
 const add = (a, b) => a + b;
 ```
 
-But you use it frequently to increment, it might make sense to fix one of those numbers:
+但如果你要实现递增这样的功能，你就需要合理地固定其中一个数字之后频繁地使用这个函数：
 
 ```
 const a = add(1, 1);
@@ -113,19 +113,19 @@ const c = add(b, 1);
 // ...
 ```
 
-We can curry the add function:
+我们可以柯里化这个方法
 
 ```
 const add = a => b => a + b;
 ```
 
-And then create a partial application, applying the function to its first argument, and returning a new function that takes the next argument:
+然后创建一个偏函数应用，在函数调用时传入第一个参数，就会返回一个接受下一个参数的新函数：
 
 ```
 const inc = add(1);
 ```
 
-Now we can use `inc` instead of `add` when we need to increment by `1`, which reduces the code required:
+现在，当我们需要增加 `1` 时，我们可以使用 `inc` 而不是之前的 `add` 方法，这就减少了我们所需的代码量：
 
 ```
 const a = inc(1);
@@ -134,15 +134,15 @@ const c = inc(b);
 // ...
 ```
 
-In this case, `inc` is just a _specialized_ version of add. All curried functions are abstractions. In fact, all higher-order functions are generalizations that you can specialize by passing one or more arguments.
+在这个例子里，inc 只是用来完成相加运算的一个**特定**版本。所有柯里化函数都是抽象出来的。而在实际上，所有高阶函数都可以概括为通过传递一个或者多个参数来得到特定的结果。
 
-For example, `Array.prototype.map()` is a higher-order function that abstracts the idea of applying a function to each element of an array in order to return a new array of processed values. We can write `map` as a curried function to make this more obvious:
+比如 `Array.prototype.map()` 就是一个高阶函数，它抽象出一个方案，用来将函数应用于数组当中的每个元素以返回处理后所得到的元素构成的新数组。我们可以将 `map` 写成一个柯里化函数来让这个过程更加的明显：
 
 ```
 const map = f => arr => arr.map(f);
 ```
 
-This version of `map` takes the specializing function and then returns a specialized version of itself that takes the array to be processed:
+这版代码中的 map 是接受一个特定函数作为参数，然后返回另一个特定的方法，即以给定函数为方法，处理数组中每个元素：
 
 ```
 const f = n => n * 2;
@@ -152,30 +152,30 @@ const doubled = doubleAll([1, 2, 3]);
 // => [2, 4, 6]
 ```
 
-Note that the definition of `doubleAll` required a trivial amount of code: `map(f)` — that's it! That's the entire definition. Starting with useful abstractions as our building blocks, we can construct fairly complex behavior with very little new code.
+注意这里我们定义 `doubleAll` 仅仅只需要这一小段代码 `map(f)` —— 就这么简单！这就是它的整个定义。如果我们在开始构建我们的代码块时就抽象那些常用的功能，我们就可以用很少的新代码来组合成相当复杂的行为。
 
-### Conclusion
+### 结论
 
-Software developers spend their entire careers creating and composing abstractions — many without a good fundamental grasp of abstraction or composition.
+软件开发人员花费它们的整个职业生涯来创建抽象和组合抽象 —— 但仍有许多人对抽象或者组合它们没有一个良好的基本掌握。
 
-When you create abstractions, you should be deliberate about it, and you should be aware of the good abstractions that have already been made available to you (such as the always useful `map`, `filter`, and `reduce`). Learn to recognize characteristics of good abstractions:
+每当你创建抽象时，你都应该仔细地去考虑它，而且你也应该要意识到有很多已经为你提供地良好抽象（例如常用的 `map`，`filter`，和 `reduce`）。我们应该要学会识别抽象的特征：
 
-*   Simple
-*   Concise
-*   Reusable
-*   Independent
-*   Decomposable
-*   Recomposable
+*   Simple（简单）
+*   Concise（明了）
+*   Reusable（可重用的）
+*   Independent（独立的）
+*   Decomposable（可分解的）
+*   Recomposable（可重新组合的）
 
-### Learn More at EricElliottJS.com
+### 在 EricElliottJS.com 了解更多信息
 
-Video lessons on functional programming are available for members of EricElliottJS.com. If you’re not a member, [sign up today](https://ericelliottjs.com/).
+更多关于函数式编程的视频课程可供 EricElliottJS.com 的会员使用。如果您还不是会员，请[立即注册](https://ericelliottjs.com/)。
 
 [![](https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*3njisYUeHOdyLCGZ8czt_w.jpeg)](https://ericelliottjs.com/product/lifetime-access-pass/)
 
 * * *
 
-**Eric Elliott** is the author of [“Programming JavaScript Applications”](http://pjabook.com) (O’Reilly), and cofounder of the software mentorship platform, [DevAnywhere.io](https://devanywhere.io/). He has contributed to software experiences for **Adobe Systems**, **Zumba Fitness**, **The Wall Street Journal**, **ESPN**, **BBC**, and top recording artists including **Usher**, **Frank Oc**.
+Eric Elliott 是 “Programming JavaScript Applications”（O'Reilly）的作者，也是软件导师平台 DevAnywhere.io 的联合创始人。他为 Adobe Systems，Zumba Fitness，华尔街日报，ESPN，BBC 以及包括 Usher，Frank Oc 等在内的顶级录音艺术家的软件体验做出了贡献。
 
 > 如果发现译文存在错误或其他需要改进的地方，欢迎到 [掘金翻译计划](https://github.com/xitu/gold-miner) 对译文进行修改并 PR，也可获得相应奖励积分。文章开头的 **本文永久链接** 即为本文在 GitHub 上的 MarkDown 链接。