-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 210
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update dependency versions. #206
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -33,18 +33,18 @@ | |
"main": "./lib/index", | ||
"bin" : { "yuidoc" : "./lib/cli.js" }, | ||
"dependencies": { | ||
"yui": "3.9.1", | ||
"rimraf": "~2.0.0", | ||
"yui": "3.14.1", | ||
"rimraf": "2.x", | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. There are a number of Windows-related bugfixes, as well as error-handling changes to optimize some syscalls. From personal experience, I have great faith in the maintainer's responsibility for preserving backward compatibility, and see no harm in loosening this pin. |
||
"marked": "~0.2.8", | ||
"minimatch": "~0.2.11", | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The latest |
||
"graceful-fs": ">=1.1.1", | ||
"graceful-fs": "2.x", | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Funny enough, this particular spec already provides the latest graceful-fs, which strikes me as kind of a bad thing, historically, since we had no control over which major version we were targeting. Changing it to |
||
"express": "~3.1.2" | ||
}, | ||
"devDependencies": { | ||
"ytestrunner": "~0.3.3", | ||
"yuitest": ">=0.7.3", | ||
"selleck": "~0.1", | ||
"istanbul": "~0.1.27" | ||
"istanbul": "0.2.x" | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. gotwarlost/istanbul@v0.1.46...master The biggest feature here I would like is a comment syntax for explicitly ignoring things for code coverage. The potential for adding a There are no explicit bug fixes that I'm aware of, but the minor version bump seems like just paranoia on the author's part:
The success of the tests seems to indicate that the concern was unfounded. |
||
}, | ||
"scripts": { | ||
"test": "istanbul cover --print=both --yui ytestrunner -- --include ./tests/options.js --include ./tests/builder.js --include ./tests/parser.js --include ./tests/parser_coffee.js --include ./tests/files.js" | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I really do think we should bump the yui dependency, possibly even to a looser
3.x
spec.