-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
Bluetooth: Host: Add legacy pairing test config #99742
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
HaavardRei
wants to merge
1
commit into
zephyrproject-rtos:main
Choose a base branch
from
HaavardRei:legacy_pairing_test_config
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+15
−5
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it not allowed to only support legacy pairing in recent version of the core spec?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's allowed, but since Zephyr 3.0 the use of legacy pairing has been discouraged for being less/not secure, so I didn't want this Kconfig to imply otherwise. Zephyr-devices support legacy pairing with devices that do not support secure connections, but since Zephyr-devices do support it they will always default to this (and thus this config is needed to force it).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm wondering if we should allow setting this without
BT_TESTING, but treat it as a warning for the above reasons. That would be similar to how we treat e.g.BT_USE_DEBUG_KEYS, where we have both Kconfig and CMake warnings if it's enabled.Alternatively we should consider adding the same
depends on BT_TESTINGfor things likeBT_USE_DEBUG_KEYS.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Both suggestions are fine by me, do you have any thoughts @jhedberg?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think
depends on BT_TESTINGis the right way.BT_USE_DEBUG_KEYSshould have it as well.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jhedberg Should we apply
depends on BT_TESTINGfor all the other similar configs? And then if we do, should we remove the warning for them as well, and add/keep only a warning forBT_TESTING?