[v3] Make initForZowe argument profileTypeConfigurations required

[JillieBeanSim]

Proposed changes

make initForZowe argument profileTypeConfigurations required

Release Notes

Milestone: vNext

Changelog:

• Changed IApiExplorerExtenders.initForZowe profileTypeConfigurations: imperative.ICommandProfileTypeConfiguration[] to a required argument to address issues seen after registration of profile type when not passed. #2575
• Changed ZoweExplorerExtender.initForZowe profileTypeConfigurations: imperative.ICommandProfileTypeConfiguration[] to a required argument to address issues seen after registration of profile type when not passed. #2575

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to Zowe Explorer?
Put an x in the boxes that apply

• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Updates to Documentation or Tests (if none of the other choices apply)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This checklist will be used as reference for both the contributor and the reviewer

• I have read the CONTRIBUTOR GUIDANCE wiki
• PR title follows Conventional Commits Guidelines
• PR Description is included
• gif or screenshot is included if visual changes are made
• yarn workspace vscode-extension-for-zowe vscode:prepublish has been executed
• All checks have passed (DCO, Jenkins and Code Coverage)
• I have added unit test and it is passing
• I have added integration test and it is passing
• There is coverage for the code that I have added
• I have tested it manually and there are no regressions found
• I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)
• Any PR dependencies have been merged and published (if appropriate)

Further comments

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (72dcc54) 93.42% compared to head (3615eb0) 93.42%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on next.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             next    #2659   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.42%   93.42%           
=======================================
  Files         109      109           
  Lines       10237    10237           
  Branches     2134     2134           
=======================================
  Hits         9564     9564           
  Misses        672      672           
  Partials        1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[traeok]

Thanks @JillieBeanSim!