-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump up version number for "old" preview api #10768
Conversation
Fixed systemData.
Fixed identitytype case.
…nt PR to rename properties.
Removed optional properties from dataControllers. Marked some properties required for dataControllers.
[Staging] Swagger Validation Report
️✔️ |
Rule | Message |
---|---|
R3023 - OperationsAPIImplementation |
Operations API must be implemented for '/providers/Microsoft.AzureData/operations'. New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L18 |
Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L1536 |
|
The response of operation:'DataControllers_ListInSubscription' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L884 |
|
The response of operation:'SqlManagedInstances_List' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L20 |
|
The response of operation:'SqlManagedInstances_ListByResourceGroup' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L59 |
|
The response of operation:'DataControllers_ListInGroup' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L923 |
|
The response of operation:'SqlServerInstances_ListByResourceGroup' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L347 |
|
The response of operation:'PostgresInstances_List' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L596 |
|
The response of operation:'PostgresInstances_ListByResourceGroup' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L635 |
|
The response of operation:'SqlServerInstances_List' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. New: Microsoft.AzureData/preview/2020-09-08-preview/azuredata.json#L308 |
️️✔️
Avocado [Detail]
️✔️
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
ModelValidation [Detail]
️✔️
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation [Detail]
️✔️
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Azure CLI Extension Generation - Release
No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured
|
azure-sdk-for-go - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-net - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-python - Release
|
azure-sdk-for-python-track2 - Release
No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured
|
Trenton Generation - Release
No readme.md specification configuration files were found that are associated with the files modified in this pull request, or swagger_to_sdk section in readme.md is not configured
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Hi @erich-wang can you help us review this PR? There is a validation failing regarding support for the "operations api". It's our understanding that we don't have to support that for preview, only for GA (which we plan on doing). Thank you for your help. |
@jorgbaca , as mentioned in the description: |
Thank you for your help @erich-wang . I'll reach out to the on call. |
@erich-wang Contacted ARM and they already signed off. Let me know if you need anything from me to complete this PR. Thanks you. |
* WIP: Updating Microsoft.AzureData * Minor changes * Adding new SystemData property to examples * Fixed formatting * Update azuredata.json Fixed systemData. * Update azuredata.json Fixed identitytype case. * Fixed formatting * Removing changes from this PR (suggested by ARM). Will send a different PR to rename properties. * Added optional properties to sqlManagedInstances. Removed optional properties from dataControllers. Marked some properties required for dataControllers. * Ran prettier check * Adding missing parameter * Added new definition for data controller patch model * Fixed parameter * Copying 2019 api to 2020 * Removing EOS examples (and list operation which is not supported) * Remvoing EOS stuff from azuredata.json. Removing operation resource as well * Update postgres details * Update postgres example * Updating api-version in examples * Adding last uploaded date and k8sRaw * Update descriptions * Fix paramters * Add missing bracket * Update readme
…into formrecognizer_regeneration * 'master' of https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs: (21 commits) [Hub Generated] Move private branch 'dev-healthcareapis-Microsoft.HealthcareApis-2020-03-15' to public (Azure#10757) added new api version (Azure#10784) updated apispec (Azure#10719) Bump up version number for "old" preview api (Azure#10768) [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.CostManagement to add version stable/2019-11-01 (Azure#10699) [ASR][V2A-RCM] Add new properties and provider specific models for V2A RCM. (Azure#10487) Update provisioningStatus field name for assignment (Azure#10754) [Microsoft.ApiManagement][2019-12-01] Content management resources: Collapsed the reference to metadata. (Azure#10755) Add Metrics Advisor API Properties. (Azure#10722) Remove LiveVideoAnalytics Swagger and samples from Azure repo, as this should not be public, will recheckin this to a branch on azure-rest-api-specs-pr repo, and maintain it in that branch. (Azure#10796) Update keys.json (Azure#10495) Add new API version 2020-09-01 (Azure#10737) Corrected Examples for Resource Mover to generate documentation examp… (Azure#10791) Add support for filter by deviceId (Azure#10771) Update openapi-authoring-automated-guidelines.md (Azure#10606) Adding request body for listcredential for Microsoft.Kubernetes (Azure#10766) Add new resource to Microsoft.Sql "ServerTrustGroup". (Azure#10705) add alias for auto_rev_minor_version to fix az CLI linter error (Azure#10789) Update workbooks api to include sourceId (Azure#10781) [NetAppFiles]Anf 6195 swagger restapi to2020 06 01 bugfix (Azure#10753) ...
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from API Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.