-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Install Patches test PR #18568
Install Patches test PR #18568
Conversation
sync forked repo
sync .Net SDK repo to master
* Delete TestVMExtensionOperations.json * Delete TestVMScaleSetExtensions.json
* Update SdkInfo_ComputeManagementClient.cs * Update VirtualMachineRunCommandsOperations.cs * Update VirtualMachineScaleSetVMRunCommandsOperations.cs * Create TestVMExtensionOperations.json * Delete TestVMExtensionOperations.json * Create TestVMExtensionOperations.json * Create TestVMScaleSetExtensions.json
* adding 2020-12-01 compute generated files * update default sku * update tests * test updates * records * tests fixes * all the recorded tests * more update * more update * more update * last test fixes * Updated TestVMIdentitySystemAssignedUserAssigned SDK Test to create User Assigned Identity using SDK (#17861) * Updated TestVMIdentitySystemAssignedUserAssigned SDK Test to create User Assigned MI using MSI SDK * Resolved Merge Conflicts and updated the test Co-authored-by: Pavan Rachapudy <vrachapu@microsoft.com> * Delete AppGW tests (#17977) * Delete VMScaleSetAppGwWithAS.json * Delete VMScaleSetAppGwWithAS_A1V2.json * Delete VMScaleSetAppGwWithAS_SPG_False.json * Delete VMScaleSetAppGwWithAS_Spot.json * Delete VMScaleSetAppGWTests.cs * Delete deprecated ContainerService tests (#17976) * Delete ContainerServiceOperationalTests.cs * Delete ContainerServiceTestsBase.cs * Delete ContainerServiceUpdateTests.cs * Delete TestDCOSOperations.json * Delete TestSwarmOperations.json * Delete TestContainerServiceUpdateOperations.json * test * remove test text Co-authored-by: pavanrachapudy <pavanrachapudy@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Pavan Rachapudy <vrachapu@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Adam Sandor <adsandor@microsoft.com>
* Delete CloudServiceExtensionTests.cs * Delete CloudServiceOperationTests.cs * Delete CloudServiceRoleInstanceTests.cs * Delete CloudServiceScenarioTests.cs * Delete CloudServiceTestsBase.cs * Delete CloudServiceUpdateTests.cs * Delete MultiRole_CreateUpdateGetAndDeleteWithExtension_WorkerAndWebRole.json * Delete MultiRole_CreateUpdateGetAndDeleteWithExtension_WorkerAndWebRole_MultiRoleExtension.json * Delete Test_Create_PowerOff_Start_CloudServiceOperation.json * Delete Test_ListCloudServicesOperation.json * Delete Test_CloudServiceRoleInstanceOperations.json * Delete TestCloudServiceScenarioOperations.json * Delete TestCloudServiceScenarioOperations_DeleteCloudService.json * Delete TestCloudServiceScenarioOperations_ExtensionProfile.json * Delete TestCloudServiceScenarioOperations_InstanceView.json * Delete TestCloudServiceOperations_ScaleIn_ScaleOut.json * Delete TestCloudServiceUpdateOperations.json * Update AzSdk.RP.props * Update AzSdk.RP.props remove containerService * Delete ServiceConfigurationHelpers.cs
This pull request is protected by Check Enforcer. What is Check Enforcer?Check Enforcer helps ensure all pull requests are covered by at least one check-run (typically an Azure Pipeline). When all check-runs associated with this pull request pass then Check Enforcer itself will pass. Why am I getting this message?You are getting this message because Check Enforcer did not detect any check-runs being associated with this pull request within five minutes. This may indicate that your pull request is not covered by any pipelines and so Check Enforcer is correctly blocking the pull request being merged. What should I do now?If the check-enforcer check-run is not passing and all other check-runs associated with this PR are passing (excluding license-cla) then you could try telling Check Enforcer to evaluate your pull request again. You can do this by adding a comment to this pull request as follows: What if I am onboarding a new service?Often, new services do not have validation pipelines associated with them. In order to bootstrap pipelines for a new service, please perform following steps: For data-plane/track 2 SDKs Issue the following command as a pull request comment:
For track 1 management-plane SDKsPlease open a separate PR and to your service SDK path in this file. Once that PR has been merged, you can re-run the pipeline to trigger the verification. |
just from the bigger PR
…icByPlatform.json
…aticByPlatform.json
/check-enforcer evaluate |
Is this PR still needed it has some conflicts in the branch? |
Closing due to inactivity, reopen if its still needed. |
Tests for feature released in https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/master/specification/compute/resource-manager/Microsoft.Compute/stable/2020-12-01/compute.json.
#17226
and
https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-net/pull/17184/files
All SDK Contribution checklist:
This checklist is used to make sure that common guidelines for a pull request are followed.
Draft
mode if it is:General Guidelines and Best Practices
Testing Guidelines
SDK Generation Guidelines
*.csproj
andAssemblyInfo.cs
files have been updated with the new version of the SDK. Please double check nuget.org current release version.Additional management plane SDK specific contribution checklist:
Note: Only applies to
Microsoft.Azure.Management.[RP]
orAzure.ResourceManager.[RP]
Management plane SDK Troubleshooting
new service
label and/or contact assigned reviewer.Verify Code Generation
step, please ensure:generate.ps1/cmd
to generate this PR instead of callingautorest
directly.Please pay attention to the @microsoft.csharp version output after running generate.ps1. If it is lower than current released version (2.3.82), please run it again as it should pull down the latest version,
Old outstanding PR cleanup
Please note:
If PRs (including draft) has been out for more than 60 days and there are no responses from our query or followups, they will be closed to maintain a concise list for our reviewers.