Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added 'name' field to waypoint #29931

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Oct 25, 2023
Merged

Conversation

esh-g
Copy link
Contributor

@esh-g esh-g commented Oct 19, 2023

Details

Bifurcated the address search with title and description for each address with a new field called name for each address.

Fixed Issues

$ #29222
$ #30255
PROPOSAL: #29222 (comment)

Tests

  1. Click on request money.
  2. Click on distance tab
  3. Click on start and search for a location (as shown in video)
  4. Make sure the places are shown with a title and a description.
  5. Click on save and then select the finish place in the same way.
  6. Make sure the waypoint names are shown like this:
Screenshot 2023-10-19 at 7 45 27 AM
  1. Click on 'Next' and make sure the request is created successfully.
  2. Go to the request and click on the receipt.
  3. Make sure the receipt has the name of the place as well as description
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Click on request money.
  2. Click on distance tab
  3. Click on start and search for a location (as shown in video)
  4. Make sure the places are shown with a title and a description.
  5. Click on save and then select the finish place in the same way.
  6. Make sure the waypoint names are shown like this:
Screenshot 2023-10-19 at 7 45 27 AM
  1. Click on 'Next' and make sure the request is created successfully.
  2. Go to the request and click on the receipt.
  3. Make sure the receipt has the name of the place as well as description
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2023-10-19.at.8.43.42.PM-1.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
71c90eb4-7d6b-4e4b-b6ae-ebdb07e706b9.mp4
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2023-10-19.at.9.47.42.PM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
9bafcaf4-69cf-4042-8681-b62a7b4c1426.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
991f7234-ab0f-433d-843c-c0161d68da8a.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-10-19.at.9.25.39.PM-1.mov

@esh-g esh-g requested a review from a team as a code owner October 19, 2023 02:19
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from dubielzyk-expensify and mananjadhav and removed request for a team October 19, 2023 02:19
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 19, 2023

@dubielzyk-expensify @mananjadhav One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 19, 2023

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

esh-g commented Oct 19, 2023

@mananjadhav I will attach the videos today (have to compress them without losing all the quality 😅) In the meantime, feel free to go over the changes

@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

esh-g commented Oct 19, 2023

@mananjadhav @dubielzyk-expensify All the videos have been added

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @esh-g. I'll get to this in a while.

Co-authored-by: Manan <manan.jadhav@gmail.com>
@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

@esh-g Can you confirm that we don't need to update AddressSearch.stories.js?

@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

esh-g commented Oct 19, 2023

@mananjadhav I don't think so because in the stories page, we are not able to access the places from the API anyway... It only shows the not found and error cases. I even tried it on main and this branch and the behaviour is same

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

I just checked that. I asked because we're updating the view behavior of the component, but it looks like we don't pass the props to be able to populate the UI. Thanks for confirming.

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

I think we have one issue here. Assuming if we have users with existing recent pins. They won't show up because the name is empty.

web-empty-name.mov

I am not sure if it's a case to consider, but this can lead to a bad experience for the user.

@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

esh-g commented Oct 19, 2023

@mananjadhav I also noticed that but it will only be faced for the current users until they don't replace their recents with the new format... I'm not sure if this would be a case to consider as well. So, please let me know if I should do so...

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

mananjadhav commented Oct 19, 2023

I think it's a non-issue. Hence I am going ahead with the testing. We'll confirm with @neil-marcellini on this one.

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

mananjadhav commented Oct 19, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web web-places-name-preview
web-places-name-list.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome mweb-chrome-places-name-preview
mweb-chrome-places-name-list.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
mweb-safari-places-name-list-and-preview.mov
Desktop
desktop-places-name-list-and-preview.mov
iOS
ios-places-name-list-and-preview.mov
Android
android-name-places-list.mov

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the quick PR @esh-g.

@neil-marcellini All yours. Want your feedback on this comment.

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed.

@dubielzyk-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good. I do think this shouldn't be a thing though:
CleanShot 2023-10-20 at 10 58 58@2x

There should always be a primary text line and in this instance there's only a secondary one.

@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

esh-g commented Oct 20, 2023

@dubielzyk-expensify @neil-marcellini Just pushed a commit to handle that case... Let me know if it looks good!

@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

esh-g commented Oct 20, 2023

Gentle bump @neil-marcellini @dubielzyk-expensify

Copy link
Contributor

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job on this so far! It's getting a bit tricky because we have to consider that existing recent waypoints don't have the name field. I'm pushing back on the design decision a bit and we'll discuss it in Slack. I'll let you know what we decide. In the meantime you can get started on the other changes.

src/pages/iou/WaypointEditor.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pages/iou/WaypointEditor.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/AddressSearch/index.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/AddressSearch/index.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/AddressSearch/index.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/DistanceEReceipt.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/TransactionUtils.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/RecentWaypoint.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/Transaction.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

esh-g commented Oct 21, 2023

@neil-marcellini Really sorry for the delay... I have made all the requested changes. The main difference of opinion here was that I thought name ought to be a 'required' field which is why I wanted to make sure it was defined everywhere but I have raised the concern here but still I have now made the changes to make it an optional field

@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

esh-g commented Oct 23, 2023

gentle bump @neil-marcellini

@neil-marcellini
Copy link
Contributor

I'm pushing back on the design decision a bit and we'll discuss it in Slack. I'll let you know what we decide.

We decided in Slack (internally) that it's ok to have the address displayed in the secondary text style when the place name is missing.

@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

esh-g commented Oct 23, 2023

@neil-marcellini Are you saying that only for the distance receipt or also for the suggestion row?

Copy link
Contributor

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the cleanup so far @esh-g. We made our decision about the styling, so would you please get that updated too? Please DM me if you have questions and let me know when it's ready for another review.

src/pages/iou/WaypointEditor.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, thanks for all the updates. I think it's good to go.

src/components/AddressSearch/index.js Show resolved Hide resolved
@neil-marcellini
Copy link
Contributor

@mananjadhav would you please test once more since we have made a handful of changes?

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

I will test this in a few hours.

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

@neil-marcellini @esh-g Tested with the updated changes.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web-name-in-places.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
mweb-chrome-name-in-places.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
mweb-safari-name-in-places.mov
Desktop
desktop-name-in-places.mov
iOS
ios-name-in-places.mov
Android
android-name-in-places.mov

@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

esh-g commented Oct 25, 2023

gentle bump @neil-marcellini

@neil-marcellini neil-marcellini merged commit 8609454 into Expensify:main Oct 25, 2023
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/neil-marcellini in version: 1.3.91-1 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/marcaaron in version: 1.3.91-8 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/neil-marcellini in version: 1.3.93-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 1.3.93-1 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants