Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TS migration] Migrate 'ReportReactionList' component to TypeScript #34549

Merged

Conversation

vadymbokatov
Copy link
Contributor

@vadymbokatov vadymbokatov commented Jan 16, 2024

@blazejkustra @getusha

Details

The ReportReactionList component is migrated to TypeScript.

Fixed Issues

$ #31976

PROPOSAL: #31976 (comment)

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as the QA tests. It also should behave the same offline.

QA Steps

  1. Open any chat (e.g. a workspace chat)
  2. Add a reaction emoji to any messages
  3. Hover and right-click on the reaction emoji on the message (on desktop and web), or long-press the emoji (on mobile)
  4. The popover should show up, having the info of the people who reacted the same emoji, the emoji count etc.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android-native.mp4
iOS: Native
ios-native.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
macos-chrome.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
macos-native.mp4

@vadymbokatov vadymbokatov requested a review from a team as a code owner January 16, 2024 02:19
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from getusha and removed request for a team January 16, 2024 02:19
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 16, 2024

@getusha Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link
Contributor

@blazejkustra blazejkustra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please have a look at TS guidelines 😄

Also a kind request, please change the title to:
[TS migration] Migrate 'ReportReactionList' component to TypeScript

@vadymbokatov vadymbokatov changed the title 31976 report reaction list migration [TS migration] Migrate 'ReportReactionList' component to TypeScript Jan 16, 2024
@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

Lint and Ts checks are failing, let me know once everything is resolved and I'll have a look @vadymbokatov

@vadymbokatov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @blazejkustra
This task is done. Please kindly review and let me know if there are any issues. Thanks.

@getusha
Copy link
Contributor

getusha commented Jan 23, 2024

@vadymbokatov several tests are failing, lets solve that.

@vadymbokatov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vadymbokatov several tests are failing, lets solve that.

Hi. Thanks for your consideration. Would you please provide some steps on how are you running the tests? I'm running them with npm run test and everything is fine as you're seeing in the attached screenshot.
Screenshot 2024-01-24 at 08 57 40

@vadymbokatov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@getusha @blazejkustra
The lint check errors are fixed. Thanks.

vadymbokatov and others added 4 commits January 24, 2024 14:44
Co-authored-by: Błażej Kustra <46095609+blazejkustra@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Błażej Kustra <46095609+blazejkustra@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Błażej Kustra <46095609+blazejkustra@users.noreply.github.com>
…overReactionList.tsx

Co-authored-by: Błażej Kustra <46095609+blazejkustra@users.noreply.github.com>
@vadymbokatov
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is weird as I wasn't able to reproduce it. Does it happen always or sometimes? Can you please let me know the exact steps to reproduce it? Thanks.

1. React on a message

2. long press on the reaction

3. press on the user profile shown

I think it happens sometimes will test it again.

I just tried to reproduce it again in different scenarios (e.g. slow internet connection, offline mode, etc.) and I was unsuccessful. Please kindly let me know if you could catch it again and how did you manage to do so, and I will fix it immediately.
Thanks. @getusha

@getusha
Copy link
Contributor

getusha commented Feb 9, 2024

This PR Staging
Screen.Recording.2024-02-09.at.6.08.48.PM.mov
Screen.Recording.2024-02-09.at.6.10.44.PM.mov

the position of the popover is wrong, looks like related to this PR.

@getusha
Copy link
Contributor

getusha commented Feb 12, 2024

@vadymbokatov could you please check ^, thanks!

@vadymbokatov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vadymbokatov could you please check ^, thanks!

Thanks for the heads up. I'm checking the issue. Will let you know when fixed.

@vadymbokatov
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR Staging
Screen.Recording.2024-02-09.at.6.08.48.PM.mov

Screen.Recording.2024-02-09.at.6.10.44.PM.mov

the position of the popover is wrong, looks like related to this PR.

Fixed. Please give it another try. Thanks.

@getusha
Copy link
Contributor

getusha commented Feb 14, 2024

@vadymbokatov thanks! testing now.

Copy link
Contributor

@getusha getusha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks @vadymbokatov & @blazejkustra

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from MonilBhavsar February 15, 2024 15:00
@vadymbokatov
Copy link
Contributor Author

LGTM, thanks @vadymbokatov & @blazejkustra

Thanks @getusha for your effort. Also @blazejkustra highly appreciate your help on this.

Copy link
Contributor

@MonilBhavsar MonilBhavsar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good and works fine. Thanks all!

@MonilBhavsar MonilBhavsar merged commit 52ed833 into Expensify:main Feb 20, 2024
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@vadymbokatov vadymbokatov deleted the 31976-report-reaction-list-migration branch February 20, 2024 09:40
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/MonilBhavsar in version: 1.4.44-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 1.4.44-13 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants