Skip confirmation page for Quick Actions

[Gonals]

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #38051
PROPOSAL:

Tests

1. Log into Newdot
2. Create a manual money request from someone
3. Confirm it displays in the Quick Action Button (QAB):

4. Click the QAB. It should take you to create a new manual request. After entering the amount, the request should be created immediately, without asking for confirmation. The Button should say "Request" instead of "Next":

5. Repeat steps 2-4, but with a Scan request. The request should be created automatically after you add the image.
6. Repeat steps 2-4, but with a Distance request. The request should be created automatically after you select the distance and click the button.
7. Repeat steps 2-4 for Send Money. The money should be sent without asking for confirmation, and the button should say "Pay Elsewhere/With expensify" depending on your setup:

8. Repeat steps 2-4, but requesting from a workspace. In this case, it should ask for confirmation.
9. Repeat steps 5, but requesting from a workspace. The request should be created automatically after you add the image.
10. Repeat steps 6, but requesting from a workspace. The request should be created automatically after you add the image.
11. Repeat steps 2-4, but splitting the request. After entering the amount, the request should be created immediately, and the button should say Split:

12. Repeat steps 5, but splitting the request. The request should be created automatically after you add the image.

13. Create a task from the global create button.

14. The QAB should now be set to Assign Task

15. Confirm the Assign Task flow skips the confirmation page

Note: Split distance doesn't work correctly. This is an unrelated, known issue

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

None

QA Steps

Same as tests

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

• I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
  • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop
• I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
  • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
  • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

MacOS: Desktop

[melvin-bot]

@c3024 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[c3024]

Please merge main as the version in package.json is old and backend sends an error asking to update.

[pecanoro]

@c3024 Can you test one last time before we merge to make sure we didn't break it with the last changes?

[pecanoro]

Did you add this or is this coming from resolving conflicts?

[Gonals]

Conflicts. Taking a look to make sure I'm not breaking anything there

[Gonals]

Ah, I was wrong. I changed this to have the file available

[c3024]

On it.

[c3024]

Now Request Money is renamed as Submit Expense and in normal flow the confirm button says Submit and the QAB flow shows Request on the button for manual and distance requests.

[c3024]

Everything works well on Chrome except this minor issue.

skipConfirm1.mp4

skipConfirm2.mp4

skipConfirm3.mp4

[c3024]

Works well on Android too.

part1.mp4

part2.mp4

I think we can go ahead

[OSBotify]

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.4.64-6 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

[DylanDylann]

In the case we create a split bill via QAB that means the report already exists we should call splitBill function as the same here which already handle this case and also navigate to the correctly report after creating.

[Gonals]

I'm still seeing the wrong behavior in non-QAB flows 😕

[DylanDylann]

@Gonals Could you help to detail what is wrong?

[Gonals]

I've tested the flow and it creates two groups:

1. Create a new group chat
2. Add a Split request in that chat
3. Create a new split from global create. Choose the members of the chat.
4. A new group chat is created, instead of posting it in the existing one

[s77rt]

The correct default is (none) (CONST.TRANSACTION.PARTIAL_TRANSACTION_MERCHANT). The empty string caused the merchant value to fallback to Expense

Coming from #41010