Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(mypy): unify hathor and test modules strictness [part VI/VI] #975

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2024

Conversation

glevco
Copy link
Contributor

@glevco glevco commented Mar 14, 2024

Depends on #974

Motivation

This PR continues to improve the strictness of mypy in test modules. For more info see the first PR in this series, #969.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Unify the custom mypy override sections into a single one by updating test modules accordingly.

Checklist

  • If you are requesting a merge into master, confirm this code is production-ready and can be included in future releases as soon as it gets merged

@glevco glevco self-assigned this Mar 14, 2024
@glevco glevco changed the title refactor(mypy): unify hathor and test modules strictness refactor(mypy): unify hathor and test modules strictness [part VI/VI] Mar 14, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.08%. Comparing base (08590e3) to head (b6f1223).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #975      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.06%   85.08%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         295      295              
  Lines       22866    22866              
  Branches     3443     3443              
==========================================
+ Hits        19450    19455       +5     
+ Misses       2725     2724       -1     
+ Partials      691      687       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@glevco glevco marked this pull request as ready for review March 19, 2024 01:40
@glevco glevco force-pushed the refactor/strict-mypy-5 branch from 587695c to f9b553d Compare March 19, 2024 01:46
@glevco glevco force-pushed the refactor/strict-mypy-6 branch from 946b5cc to 773358b Compare March 19, 2024 01:48
msbrogli
msbrogli previously approved these changes Mar 19, 2024
@glevco glevco force-pushed the refactor/strict-mypy-5 branch from f9b553d to e738c92 Compare March 19, 2024 18:51
@glevco glevco force-pushed the refactor/strict-mypy-6 branch from 773358b to cad1714 Compare March 19, 2024 18:52
jansegre
jansegre previously approved these changes Mar 19, 2024
@glevco glevco force-pushed the refactor/strict-mypy-5 branch from e738c92 to e064a09 Compare March 20, 2024 18:33
@glevco glevco force-pushed the refactor/strict-mypy-6 branch from cad1714 to 2a0c3d0 Compare March 20, 2024 18:35
@glevco glevco force-pushed the refactor/strict-mypy-5 branch from 6ff78af to 650585f Compare March 22, 2024 16:00
@glevco glevco force-pushed the refactor/strict-mypy-6 branch from 2a0c3d0 to 0cbd96f Compare March 22, 2024 16:05
@glevco glevco force-pushed the refactor/strict-mypy-5 branch from 650585f to 9159491 Compare March 22, 2024 17:08
Base automatically changed from refactor/strict-mypy-5 to master March 22, 2024 19:16
@glevco glevco dismissed stale reviews from jansegre and msbrogli March 22, 2024 19:16

The base branch was changed.

@glevco glevco force-pushed the refactor/strict-mypy-6 branch from 0cbd96f to 5e00ff5 Compare March 22, 2024 19:19
@glevco glevco force-pushed the refactor/strict-mypy-6 branch from 5e00ff5 to b6f1223 Compare March 22, 2024 20:31
@glevco glevco merged commit 947db7b into master Mar 22, 2024
12 checks passed
@glevco glevco deleted the refactor/strict-mypy-6 branch March 22, 2024 23:17
@jansegre jansegre mentioned this pull request Apr 5, 2024
2 tasks
@jansegre jansegre mentioned this pull request May 8, 2024
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants