Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 12, 2022. It is now read-only.

Tag StaticArrays.jl v0.10.0 #19433

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2018

Conversation

attobot
Copy link
Contributor

@attobot attobot commented Nov 10, 2018

Repository: JuliaArrays/StaticArrays.jl
Release: v0.10.0
Travis: Travis Build Status
Diff: vs v0.9.2
requires vs v0.9.2: no changes
cc: @ChrisRackauckas

Please make sure that:

  • CI passes for supported Julia versions (if applicable).
  • Version bounds reflect minimum requirements.

@attobot
Copy link
Contributor Author

attobot commented Nov 19, 2018

Repository: JuliaArrays/StaticArrays.jl
Release: v0.10.0
Travis: Travis Build Status
Diff: vs v0.9.2
requires vs v0.9.2: no changes
cc: @timholy

Please make sure that:

  • CI passes for supported Julia versions (if applicable).
  • Version bounds reflect minimum requirements.

@attobot attobot force-pushed the StaticArrays/v0.10.0 branch from 6108679 to e75f464 Compare November 19, 2018 15:13
@timholy
Copy link
Member

timholy commented Nov 20, 2018

The JuliaCIBot run seems to be borked.

@timholy timholy closed this Nov 21, 2018
@timholy timholy reopened this Nov 21, 2018
@andreasnoack
Copy link
Member

The BEAST regression looks genuine. The rest seems spurious.

@andreasnoack
Copy link
Member

@krcools Notice that it looks like this release affects BEAST so you might want to add an upper bound on StaticArrays on the existing releases here in METADATA.

@timholy
Copy link
Member

timholy commented Nov 22, 2018

xref #19688

@andreasnoack andreasnoack merged commit 7d3f8a2 into JuliaLang:metadata-v2 Nov 22, 2018
@attobot attobot deleted the StaticArrays/v0.10.0 branch November 22, 2018 11:08
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants