Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FINE] Create source template for miq_provision_request factory #15782

Merged

Conversation

gmcculloug
Copy link
Member

Create source object for miq_provision_request factory

Based on commit df724c4

@miq-bot miq-bot changed the title Create source template for miq_provision_request factory [FINE] Create source template for miq_provision_request factory Aug 9, 2017
@gmcculloug gmcculloug force-pushed the factory_miq_provision_request_source branch from f66ecaf to d06830a Compare August 10, 2017 00:30
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Aug 10, 2017

Checked commit gmcculloug@d06830a with ruby 2.2.6, rubocop 0.47.1, and haml-lint 0.20.0
2 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. ⭐

@simaishi
Copy link
Contributor

simaishi commented Aug 10, 2017

This PR fixes Travis failure for #15696 backport. The remaining failure is unrelated, merging.

@simaishi simaishi merged commit dd1ad16 into ManageIQ:fine Aug 10, 2017
@simaishi simaishi added this to the Sprint 67 Ending Aug 21, 2017 milestone Aug 10, 2017
simaishi added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2017
…st_source

[FINE] Create source template for miq_provision_request factory
(cherry picked from commit dd1ad16)
@simaishi
Copy link
Contributor

Euwe backport details:

$ git log -1
commit cf32fffd5e90bff17be8552f88f776ab9ec501c4
Author: Satoe Imaishi <simaishi@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Aug 10 09:54:08 2017 -0400

    Merge pull request #15782 from gmcculloug/factory_miq_provision_request_source
    
    [FINE] Create source template for miq_provision_request factory
    (cherry picked from commit dd1ad16c566db72e483c0317353ac08268b57ea5)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants