Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add floating wind turbines for sea deeper than 50 metres #36

Closed
nworbmot opened this issue Apr 7, 2019 · 5 comments · Fixed by #773
Closed

Add floating wind turbines for sea deeper than 50 metres #36

nworbmot opened this issue Apr 7, 2019 · 5 comments · Fixed by #773

Comments

@nworbmot
Copy link
Member

nworbmot commented Apr 7, 2019

Need to research costs and grid connection options.
See existing Hywind park off Scotland, similar parks in Portugal, Japan, US, etc.

@BartonChenTW
Copy link

I am currently working on a floating offshore wind project and investigating the grid connection options and the integration with energy vectors. Happy to help on this issue.

@fneum
Copy link
Member

fneum commented Mar 10, 2022

Hey @Ben0911, cool, might be worth getting in contact with @p-glaum (p.glaum (at) tu-berlin.de) who will work on this on our end.

@Edudiro
Copy link

Edudiro commented Oct 11, 2023

Very interested to adding floating offshore technology. What is the state of #284 ? Happy to help move it forward :)

@p-glaum
Copy link
Contributor

p-glaum commented Oct 11, 2023

Hi @Edudiro,

actually, it is already implemented in my PyPSA-Eur fork. To merge it with the PyPSA-Eur master, I just need some time and find cost assumptions for the different investment year, which I have not found yet. Unfortunately, the Danish Energy Agency only has fixed bottom offshore wind cost assumptions. If you know a reliable sources for floating offshore wind cost with different investment years, feel free to post them here.

@Edudiro
Copy link

Edudiro commented Oct 11, 2023

Glad to hear @p-glaum,

It is trully difficult to find sources, given the early commercial stages of floating technology.
I usually follow NREL analysis , they have some nice models for offshore.

https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy23osti/81819.pdf
This one presents a regression model (FORCE) which derives the learning rates of floating and fixed, and then projects their bottom-up-computed baseline costs to the future

https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/77384.pdf
This one is a rather site-specific analysis using a different model (ORCA), which is a deterministic LCOE model. The article only covers up to 2032, but provides a data sheet with fitted data up to 2050.

If I find any new reliable source I will add it as well.

Hopefully this can be implemented soon, maybe under a disclaimer regarding the lack of reliable data on this technology due to its early stages.

tgi-climact pushed a commit to Climact/pypsa-eur-climact that referenced this issue Jul 8, 2024
Merged in feature/correct-cgt-cc-efficiencies (pull request PyPSA#36)

Feature/correct cgt cc efficiencies

* Correct O/CGT-CC efficiencies

* Change scenario name from molecule to molecules


Approved-by: Thomas Gilon
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants