Full rebuild June 2025 bump ros2-distro-mutex to 0.10.0 and build number to 10 #23

wep21 · 2025-06-26T01:00:31Z

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: wep21 <daisuke.nishimatsu1021@gmail.com>

wep21 · 2025-06-26T01:26:34Z

@traversaro I have no idea why ros2-distro-mutex is not rebuild in ci(works fine locally). Any thoughts?

additional_recipes/ros2-distro-mutex/recipe.yaml

traversaro · 2025-06-26T07:45:40Z

@traversaro I have no idea why ros2-distro-mutex is not rebuild in ci(works fine locally). Any thoughts?

I am not sure if it s related, but note that the check-patches step is failing, but somehow the CI is not failing (related to RoboStack/ros-jazzy#86).

Furthermore, I think we could:

Update rattler-build to https://github.com/prefix-dev/rattler-build/releases/tag/v0.44.0, that should have several patch related fixes that could fix some patches problem
Update vinca Add support for generating recipes also for mutex package and remove the need for additional_recipes folder vinca#79 to get rid of all manually mantained additional dependencies.

traversaro · 2025-06-26T07:54:41Z

(related to RoboStack/ros-jazzy#86).

After https://github.com/prefix-dev/rattler-build/pull/1666/files we can probably remove many workaround in the testpr job.

traversaro · 2025-06-26T08:00:01Z

@traversaro I have no idea why ros2-distro-mutex is not rebuild in ci(works fine locally). Any thoughts?

It seems that in 685cd40 the build of additional_recipes was commented out, but I can't remember doing that intentionally.

traversaro · 2025-06-26T08:08:30Z

I re-added the build of additional recipes, and drastically simplified the testpr job, and moving the check patches to its own step seems to have solved RoboStack/ros-jazzy#86 . It would be cool to just use pixi tasks directly in the testpr, but I guess for that we need to add cross-compilation support to the pixi tasks.

traversaro · 2025-06-26T08:27:25Z

@wep21 I did some cleanup, I think some patches are still failing but that seems as the patches are actually outdated (I hope).

vinca.yaml

Signed-off-by: wep21 <daisuke.nishimatsu1021@gmail.com>

wep21 · 2025-06-26T17:00:42Z

@traversaro How can I avoid this version conflict?

2025-06-26T16:50:28.3701525Z Error:   × Failed to resolve dependencies: Cannot solve the request because of: ros-
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3702786Z   │ kilted-urdfdom * cannot be installed because there are no viable options:
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3703318Z   │ └─ ros-kilted-urdfdom 5.0.0 would require
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3703681Z   │    └─ urdfdom >=5.0.0,<5.1.0a0, for which no candidates were found.
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3704021Z   │ The following packages are incompatible
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3704442Z   │ └─ ros-kilted-urdfdom * cannot be installed because there are no viable
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3704785Z   │ options:
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3705085Z   │    └─ ros-kilted-urdfdom 4.0.1 | 4.0.1 is excluded because due to strict
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3705578Z   │ channel priority not using this option from: 'https://conda.anaconda.org/
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3705934Z   │ robostack-kilted/'
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3706122Z   │ 
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3706423Z   ╰─▶ Cannot solve the request because of: ros-kilted-urdfdom * cannot be
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3706768Z       installed because there are no viable options:
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3707086Z       └─ ros-kilted-urdfdom 5.0.0 would require
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3707433Z          └─ urdfdom >=5.0.0,<5.1.0a0, for which no candidates were found.
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3708119Z       The following packages are incompatible
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3708565Z       └─ ros-kilted-urdfdom * cannot be installed because there are no viable
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3709006Z       options:
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3710076Z          └─ ros-kilted-urdfdom 4.0.1 | 4.0.1 is excluded because due to strict
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3710483Z       channel priority not using this option from: 'https://
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3710775Z       conda.anaconda.org/robostack-kilted/'

traversaro · 2025-06-26T17:20:00Z

@traversaro How can I avoid this version conflict?

2025-06-26T16:50:28.3701525Z Error:   × Failed to resolve dependencies: Cannot solve the request because of: ros-
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3702786Z   │ kilted-urdfdom * cannot be installed because there are no viable options:
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3703318Z   │ └─ ros-kilted-urdfdom 5.0.0 would require
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3703681Z   │    └─ urdfdom >=5.0.0,<5.1.0a0, for which no candidates were found.
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3704021Z   │ The following packages are incompatible
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3704442Z   │ └─ ros-kilted-urdfdom * cannot be installed because there are no viable
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3704785Z   │ options:
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3705085Z   │    └─ ros-kilted-urdfdom 4.0.1 | 4.0.1 is excluded because due to strict
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3705578Z   │ channel priority not using this option from: 'https://conda.anaconda.org/
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3705934Z   │ robostack-kilted/'
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3706122Z   │ 
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3706423Z   ╰─▶ Cannot solve the request because of: ros-kilted-urdfdom * cannot be
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3706768Z       installed because there are no viable options:
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3707086Z       └─ ros-kilted-urdfdom 5.0.0 would require
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3707433Z          └─ urdfdom >=5.0.0,<5.1.0a0, for which no candidates were found.
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3708119Z       The following packages are incompatible
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3708565Z       └─ ros-kilted-urdfdom * cannot be installed because there are no viable
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3709006Z       options:
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3710076Z          └─ ros-kilted-urdfdom 4.0.1 | 4.0.1 is excluded because due to strict
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3710483Z       channel priority not using this option from: 'https://
2025-06-26T16:50:28.3710775Z       conda.anaconda.org/robostack-kilted/'

I think we can merge conda-forge/urdfdom-feedstock#38 . I was hesitant to do that as I was afraid that that release was not intentional, as it was done without any actual breaking change to urdfdom, but after ros/rosdistro#45869 I think for sure it is an actual release. Anyhow, to avoid that the rest of the distros remain stuck with an old urdfdom (that will create a diverge w.r.t. to the version pinned in the conda-forge pinning), I think we need to add a new vinca parameter in the generate_dummy_package_with_run_deps to optionally override the rosdistro version.

traversaro · 2025-06-26T19:44:07Z

I think we can merge conda-forge/urdfdom-feedstock#38 . I was hesitant to do that as I was afraid that that release was not intentional, as it was done without any actual breaking change to urdfdom, but after ros/rosdistro#45869 I think for sure it is an actual release. Anyhow, to avoid that the rest of the distros remain stuck with an old urdfdom (that will create a diverge w.r.t. to the version pinned in the conda-forge pinning), I think we need to add a new vinca parameter in the generate_dummy_package_with_run_deps to optionally override the rosdistro version.

Actually I would like to wait for the feedback on ros/urdfdom#220 . To avoid blocking the PR, I implemented RoboStack/vinca#81 .

traversaro · 2025-06-26T20:00:42Z

I think we can merge conda-forge/urdfdom-feedstock#38 . I was hesitant to do that as I was afraid that that release was not intentional, as it was done without any actual breaking change to urdfdom, but after ros/rosdistro#45869 I think for sure it is an actual release. Anyhow, to avoid that the rest of the distros remain stuck with an old urdfdom (that will create a diverge w.r.t. to the version pinned in the conda-forge pinning), I think we need to add a new vinca parameter in the generate_dummy_package_with_run_deps to optionally override the rosdistro version.

Actually I would like to wait for the feedback on ros/urdfdom#220 . To avoid blocking the PR, I implemented RoboStack/vinca#81 .

The build was unblocked by bc7875f, I also took the occasion to devendor some packages that have much more features in the conda-forge build, that should provide more feature to users and reduce the time spent in the build.

Tobias-Fischer · 2025-06-26T22:42:12Z

backward-ros does not build on osx-64 - we should really try and unvendor this .. does your new magic help @traversaro?

2025-06-26T21:50:35.1529390Z  │ │ [1/3] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/backward.dir/src/backward.cpp.o
2025-06-26T21:50:35.1605400Z  │ │ [2/3] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/backward_object.dir/src/backward.cpp.o
2025-06-26T21:50:35.2732070Z  │ │ [3/3] Linking CXX shared library libbackward.dylib
2025-06-26T21:50:35.2791830Z  │ │ FAILED: [code=1] libbackward.dylib 
2025-06-26T21:50:35.2800900Z  │ │ : && $BUILD_PREFIX/bin/x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0-clang++ -march=core2 -mtune=haswell -mssse3 -ftree-vectorize -fPIC -fstack-protector-strong -O2 -pipe -stdlib=libc++ -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fmessage-length=0 -isystem $PREFIX/include -fdebug-prefix-map=$SRC_DIR=/usr/local/src/conda/ros-kilted-backward-ros-1.0.7 -fdebug-prefix-map=$PREFIX=/usr/local/src/conda-prefix -DBOOST_ERROR_CODE_HEADER_ONLY -Wall -Wextra -pedantic-errors -g -O3 -DNDEBUG -isysroot /Applications/Xcode_15.2.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk -mmacosx-version-min=10.15 -dynamiclib -Wl,-headerpad_max_install_names -Wl,-headerpad_max_install_names -Wl,-dead_strip_dylibs -Wl,-rpath,$PREFIX/lib -L$PREFIX/lib -o libbackward.dylib -install_name @rpath/libbackward.dylib CMakeFiles/backward.dir/src/backward.cpp.o  $PREFIX/lib/libbfd.a  /Applications/Xcode_15.2.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk/usr/lib/libdl.tbd  -liberty  -lz && :
2025-06-26T21:50:35.2809080Z  │ │ ld: library not found for -liberty

traversaro · 2025-06-26T22:57:09Z

backward-ros does not build on osx-64 - we should really try and unvendor this .. does your new magic help @traversaro?

2025-06-26T21:50:35.1529390Z  │ │ [1/3] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/backward.dir/src/backward.cpp.o
2025-06-26T21:50:35.1605400Z  │ │ [2/3] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/backward_object.dir/src/backward.cpp.o
2025-06-26T21:50:35.2732070Z  │ │ [3/3] Linking CXX shared library libbackward.dylib
2025-06-26T21:50:35.2791830Z  │ │ FAILED: [code=1] libbackward.dylib 
2025-06-26T21:50:35.2800900Z  │ │ : && $BUILD_PREFIX/bin/x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0-clang++ -march=core2 -mtune=haswell -mssse3 -ftree-vectorize -fPIC -fstack-protector-strong -O2 -pipe -stdlib=libc++ -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fmessage-length=0 -isystem $PREFIX/include -fdebug-prefix-map=$SRC_DIR=/usr/local/src/conda/ros-kilted-backward-ros-1.0.7 -fdebug-prefix-map=$PREFIX=/usr/local/src/conda-prefix -DBOOST_ERROR_CODE_HEADER_ONLY -Wall -Wextra -pedantic-errors -g -O3 -DNDEBUG -isysroot /Applications/Xcode_15.2.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk -mmacosx-version-min=10.15 -dynamiclib -Wl,-headerpad_max_install_names -Wl,-headerpad_max_install_names -Wl,-dead_strip_dylibs -Wl,-rpath,$PREFIX/lib -L$PREFIX/lib -o libbackward.dylib -install_name @rpath/libbackward.dylib CMakeFiles/backward.dir/src/backward.cpp.o  $PREFIX/lib/libbfd.a  /Applications/Xcode_15.2.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk/usr/lib/libdl.tbd  -liberty  -lz && :
2025-06-26T21:50:35.2809080Z  │ │ ld: library not found for -liberty

Unfortunatly the backward-ros and backward-cpp from conda-forge packages are quite different. backward-cpp only installs the backward.hpp header and a backwardConfig.cmake file (see https://conda-metadata-app.streamlit.app/?q=conda-forge%2Flinux-64%2Fbackward-cpp-1.6-hd64ec54_5.conda). The ros version, installs:

backward.hpp, but in a different dir
a shared library
backward_rosConfig.cmake, BackwardConfig.cmake and BackwardConfigAment.cmake`

So if we want to de-vendor it, we need to do a good old heavy patching of the package.

Tobias-Fischer · 2025-06-27T03:26:30Z

I think I "fixed" the issue by basically disabling this feature on osx-64 by not installing the required binutils package (that was recently updated on conda-forge and might not be compatible anymore ..).

wep21 · 2025-06-27T06:21:04Z

Is it possible to rerun only osx-arm64？

Tobias-Fischer · 2025-06-27T06:22:07Z

I’m not too worried about it; we can fix issues in a follow up PR

traversaro · 2025-06-27T06:57:57Z

Thanks @Tobias-Fischer @wep21 , I would include also the fix RoboStack/ros-jazzy#57 if that is ok for you.

wep21 · 2025-06-27T07:04:14Z

I'm fine for including the fix. Thank you!

traversaro · 2025-06-27T09:01:01Z

It would be cool to also unvendor ompl , but that is probably blocked on conda-forge/ompl-feedstock#53 .

traversaro · 2025-06-27T12:12:52Z

CI is clearly happy, let's merge so we can quickly deal with post-PR failures (if any).

traversaro · 2025-06-27T12:20:34Z

CI is clearly happy, let's merge so we can quickly deal with post-PR failures (if any).

There is: #24 .

wep21 force-pushed the rebuild-202506 branch 3 times, most recently from d9cad83 to d864057 Compare June 26, 2025 01:09

rebuild for 202506

8f80530

Signed-off-by: wep21 <daisuke.nishimatsu1021@gmail.com>

wep21 force-pushed the rebuild-202506 branch from d864057 to 8f80530 Compare June 26, 2025 01:14

traversaro reviewed Jun 26, 2025

View reviewed changes

additional_recipes/ros2-distro-mutex/recipe.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Change testpr to directly use check-patches pixi command

3658438

Simplify testpr.yml

4141335

Remove all manually mantained additional recipes

0af3995

traversaro reviewed Jun 26, 2025

View reviewed changes

vinca.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

wep21 commented Jun 26, 2025

View reviewed changes

vinca.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

wep21 and others added 3 commits June 26, 2025 22:39

remove unnecessary constraints

1b53f4b

update patch

da9321a

Signed-off-by: wep21 <daisuke.nishimatsu1021@gmail.com>

update patch for win

1f2a850

wep21 force-pushed the rebuild-202506 branch from ea4ba93 to 1f2a850 Compare June 26, 2025 16:21

Devendor more packages thanks to version override

bc7875f

traversaro mentioned this pull request Jun 26, 2025

Track packages that are released in ROS build farm but are/should be in conda-forge RoboStack/robostack.github.io#17

Open

no binutils on osx-64

5b45979

Tobias-Fischer approved these changes Jun 27, 2025

View reviewed changes

traversaro mentioned this pull request Jun 27, 2025

version conflicts on graphviz when adding ros-kilted-desktop and ros-kilted-rsl(dependency of moveit2) #19

Closed

1 task

Add fix for rviz Windows problem

17c9a60

Unvendor ompl

45444a1

traversaro merged commit 64beb10 into RoboStack:main Jun 27, 2025
3 of 10 checks passed

traversaro changed the title ~~rebuild for 202506~~ Full rebuild June 2025 bump ros2-distro-mutex to 0.10.0 and build number to 10 Jun 27, 2025

wep21 deleted the rebuild-202506 branch June 27, 2025 16:20

traversaro mentioned this pull request Jul 6, 2025

Full Rebuild (Sync) July 2025: bump ros2-distro-mutex to 0.7.0 and build_number to 13 RoboStack/ros-humble#320

Merged

traversaro mentioned this pull request Jul 24, 2025

Full Rebuild (Sync) July 2025: bump ros2-distro-mutex to 0.10.0 and build_number to 9 RoboStack/ros-jazzy#95

Merged

Uh oh!

Full rebuild June 2025 bump ros2-distro-mutex to 0.10.0 and build number to 10 #23

Full rebuild June 2025 bump ros2-distro-mutex to 0.10.0 and build number to 10 #23

Uh oh!

Conversation

wep21 commented Jun 26, 2025

Uh oh!

wep21 commented Jun 26, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

traversaro commented Jun 26, 2025

Uh oh!

traversaro commented Jun 26, 2025

Uh oh!

traversaro commented Jun 26, 2025

Uh oh!

traversaro commented Jun 26, 2025

Uh oh!

traversaro commented Jun 26, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

wep21 commented Jun 26, 2025

Uh oh!

traversaro commented Jun 26, 2025

Uh oh!

traversaro commented Jun 26, 2025

Uh oh!

traversaro commented Jun 26, 2025

Uh oh!

Tobias-Fischer commented Jun 26, 2025

Uh oh!

traversaro commented Jun 26, 2025

Uh oh!

Tobias-Fischer commented Jun 27, 2025

Uh oh!

wep21 commented Jun 27, 2025

Uh oh!

Tobias-Fischer commented Jun 27, 2025

Uh oh!

traversaro commented Jun 27, 2025

Uh oh!

wep21 commented Jun 27, 2025

Uh oh!

traversaro commented Jun 27, 2025

Uh oh!

traversaro commented Jun 27, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

traversaro commented Jun 27, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

wep21 commented Jun 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading