All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.
The format is based on Keep a Changelog, and this project adheres to Semantic Versioning.
- Add E2E testing framework MVP ‒ #1395
The focus of the first beta
release is to establish the stable ABI for the final 4.0.0
release. It means that whilst subsequent beta
releases may contain breaking contract
code changes, the ABI will remain the same so that any contract compiled and deployed
with 4.0.0-beta
continue to be compatible with all future 4.0.0
versions.
In order to build contracts which use ink! v4.0.0-beta
you need to use
cargo-contract
v2.0.0-beta
.
You can install it as follows:
cargo install cargo-contract --version 2.0.0-beta
You will also need to use a version of pallet-contracts
later than 265e3f1
(Nov 3, 2022) in your node.
The v0.22.1
release of the substrate-contracts-node
is
compatible with the ink! 4.0.0-beta
release.
We have added a way to handle errors that are neither specific to a particular contract,
nor from the underlying execution environment (e.g pallet-contracts
). Instead these are
errors that may come from the smart contracting language itself.
For example, take the case where a contract message is called using an invalid selector. This is not something a smart contract author should need to define as failure case, nor is it something that the Contracts pallet needs to be aware of.
Previously, the contract execution would trap if an invalid selector was used, leaving
callers with no way to handle the error gracefully. This can now be handled with the help
of the newly added LangError
.
In short, this change means that all ink! messages and constructors now return a
Result<R, LangError>
, where R
is the original return type. Contract callers can
choose to handle the LangError
.
In order to make this error compatible with other languages we have also added a
lang_error
field to the metadata format. This will be the central registry of all the
different error variants which languages may want to emit in the future.
Related pull-requests:
Related discussions:
We had to remove ink_env::random
with #1442.
This function allowed contract developers getting random entropy.
There is unfortunately no way how this can be done safely enough
with built-in Substrate primitives on-chain currently. We're
following the recommendation of our auditors to remove it.
The alternative right now is to provide random entropy off-chain to the contract, to use a random entropy oracle, or to have a chain-extension that does this, in case the chain has a possibility to do so.
We hope to bring this function back in a future release of ink!, the best hope right now is that it could come back with Sassafras, a block production protocol for future versions of Polkadot.
- Allow using
Result<Self, Error>
as a return type in constructors ‒ #1446 - Add
Mapping::take()
function allowing to get a value removing it from storage ‒ #1461
- Add support for language level errors (
LangError
) ‒ #1450 - Return
LangError
s from constructors ‒ #1504 - Update
scale-info
requirement to2.3
‒ #1467 - Merge
Mapping::insert(key, val)
andMapping::insert_return_size(key, val)
into one method - #1463
- Remove
ink_env::random
function ‒ #1442
The ink_lang
crate has been replaced in #1223 by a new top level ink
crate. All existing sub-crates are reexported and should be used via the new ink
crate, so e.g. ink::env
instead of
ink_env
. Contract authors should now import the top level ink
crate instead of the individual crates.
- In
Cargo.toml
Replace all individualink_*
crate dependencies with theink
crate. - In the contract source:
- Remove the commonly used
use ink_lang as ink
idiom. - Replace all usages of individual crates with reexports, e.g.
ink_env
➜ink::env
.
- Remove the commonly used
#1331 changes the way ink!
works with contract storage. Storage keys
are generated at compile-time, and user facing abstractions which determine how contract data is laid out in storage
have changed.
- Initialize
Mapping
fields withMapping::default()
instead ofink_lang::utils::initialize_contract
in constructors. Seeerc20
and other examples which use aMapping
. - Remove
SpreadAllocate
,SpreadLayout
andPackedLayout
implementations.
ink! uses a bump allocator by default, additionally we supported another allocator (wee-alloc
)
through a feature flag. wee-alloc
is no longer maintained and we removed support for it.
- Introduce
ink
entrance crate ‒ #1223 - Use
XXH32
instead ofsha256
for calculating storage keys ‒ #1393
- Trim single whitespace prefix in the metadata
docs
field ‒ #1385 - Allow pay_with_call to take multiple arguments ‒ #1401
- Add
ink_env::pay_with_call!
helper macro for off-chain emulation of sending payments with contract message calls ‒ #1379
- Remove
wee-alloc
‒ #1403
This version was skipped due to an error during the release process
As part of this series of alpha
s we are looking for ways to streamline our release process,
so small errors like this are learning experiences for us.
In order to build contracts which use ink! v4.0.0-alpha.1
you need to use
cargo-contract
v2.0.0-alpha.1
.
You can install it as follows:
cargo install cargo-contract --version 2.0.0-alpha.1
We recommend using a version of the pallet-contracts
later than 6b85535
(Aug 12, 2022) in your node.
The compatibility issues will be with ChainExtension
's and the functions mentioned above.
This release contains a few breaking changes. These are indicated with the ❌ emoji.
Most of these were intitially introduced in v3.1.0
and v3.2.0
releases but
compatibility was restored in v3.3.0
.
- As part of #1224 the return type of
ink_env::set_contract_storage()
was changed to return anOption<u32>
instead of()
. - As part of #1233 the
eth_compatibility
crate was removed. Theecdsa_to_eth_address()
function from it can now be found in theink_env
crate. - As part of #1267 an argument to
ink_lang::codegen::execute_constructor()
(which is used internally by the ink! macros) was removed. - As part of #1313 the ink! ABI was changed so that the version was specified using a
dedicated
version
key instead of an implicit key which wrapped the entire ABI.
- ❌ Add
Mapping::contains(key)
andMapping::insert_return_size(key, val)
‒ #1224 - Add
payment-channel
example ‒ #1248 - ❌ Add
version
field to ink! metadata ‒ #1313 - The
rand-extension
example has been adapted to an updated version of theChainExtension
API ‒ #1356
- ❌ Contract size optimization in case contract doesn't accept payment ‒ #1267 (thanks @xgreenx).
- Move ink! linter into
ink
repository ‒ #1361
- ❌ Implement
ecdsa_to_eth_address()
and removeeth_compatibility
crate ‒ #1233
At the moment teams which use both Substrate and ink! in the same codebase are
experiencing some issues
with updating to Substrate's polkadot-0.9.27
branch.
This is because that branch uses the secp256k1@0.24
, which is incompatible with
secp256k1@0.22
This release bumps the secp256k1
version from v0.22
to v0.24
.
This release restores SemVer compatibility in the v3.x
series of releases, as well as
compatibility with the v0.13.0
release of the substrate-contracts-node
.
This version will work fine with substrate-contracts-node versions from 0.13.0 up to 0.16.0.
Context: user-reported issues on our SE unveiled backward incompatibility introduced in 3.1.0 release.
The following has been done to restore backward compatibility:
- Reverted backward-incompatible piece of #1224.
- The return signature of
ink_env::set_contract_storage()
was changed to return anOption<u32>
. This could have broken existing code, so this should've been done in aMAJOR
release. - Under the hood the PR also changed
Mapping::insert()
to use a new SEAL API ([seal1] seal_set_storage
), which resulted inCodeRejected
errors in nodes which did not have this API (e.gsubstrate-contracts-node@0.13.0
).
- The return signature of
- Reverted "Optimise deny_payment. Use everywhere semantic of deny (#1267)"
- This one is to restore compatibility between minor versions of ink! crates; see @HCastano's SE answer in this regard.
- Reverted backward-incompatible piece of #1233.
- The removal of the
eth_compatibility
crate should have been done in aMAJOR
release.
- The removal of the
All these breaking changes are subjects to the upcoming MAJOR ink! release 4.0.0.
We recommend using a version of the pallet-contracts
later than c0ee2ad
(May 23, 2022) in your node.
This is the case in the latest release of the substrate-contracts-node
v0.16.0.
- Two functions have been stabilized:
ink_env::ecdsa_recover
andink_env::ecdsa_to_eth_address
‒ #1270 #1273
We recommend using a version of the pallet-contracts
later than 7d233c2
(May 13, 2022) in your node.
This is the case in the latest release of the substrate-contracts-node
v0.15.1 and
the latest Polkadot release v0.9.22.
There are two breaking changes in this release:
- As part of #1235 the message selectors of your contract may change. A change of selectors would affect your client, frontend, Dapp, etc..
- As part of #1233 we removed the
eth_compatibility
crate.
Its recovery functionality has been moved toink_env
now:ink_env::ecdsa_to_eth_address
. The reason for this change is that we moved the gas-expensive crypto operations intopallet-contracts
.
The cratesto_default_account_id
function has been removed; the reason for this change is that ink! doesn't have knowledge about the specific Substrate types on the underlying chain. If you want to retain the function in your contract and are just using standard Substrate types you should add the prior functionality to your contract ‒ it was a simple<Blake2x256 as CryptoHash>::hash(&ecdsa_pubkey[u8; 33])
.
We added two new Mapping
API functions:
Mapping::contains
and
Mapping::insert_return_size
‒ #1224.
These are more gas-efficient than whatever you were using previously.
Additionally there are a couple new ink_env
functions now:
We've added a new example: upgradeable-contracts/set-code-hash
.
It illustrates how the newly added ink_env::set_code_hash
can be used to implement an upgradeable contract that replaces its own code.
- Implement
seal_code_hash
andseal_own_code_hash
‒ #1205 - Add
set_code_hash
function and example ‒ #1203 - Implement
ink_env::ecdsa_to_eth_address
‒ #1233 - Add
Mapping::contains(key)
andMapping::insert_return_size(key, val)
‒ #1224
- Fix ordering of message ids if the trait is implemented before the inherent section ‒ #1235
- Removed
eth_compatibility
crate and moved its functionality partly intoink_env
‒ #1233
- Improve upgradeable examples folder structure, explain differences ‒ #1188
- Update codegen after SCALE v3.1.2 release ‒ #1189
- Stop using
CallData
inmultisig
example doc test ‒ #1202
This is the stable release for ink! 3.0.
It took us a while to get here and going forward we want to do smaller releases more often.
Please note that ink! has not been audited.
We recommend using a version of the contracts
pallet later than
cc282f84ba53ed2a08374d2a655dc8f08cbc5e86
(March 15, 2022) in your node.
This is the case in the latest release of the substrate-contracts-node
:
v0.10.0.
The off-chain testing environment can be used to write unit tests for your smart contract with a simulated chain. We've now replaced the existing off-chain environment with a new one, which has a bit of a different API.
The major changes are that there is no longer any notion of "execution
context" ‒ so no more push_execution_context
or pop_execution_context
.
You can achieve all the same things with the new API, see here
for the API documentation.
We've also switched all our examples to this new environment, you can find more "template use-cases" there (e.g. for chain extension testing)
More details on the reasoning behind this can be found in #1148.
The CallBuilder
API changed to now support two types of calls:
Call
: a cross-contract call.
This was the default until this new API change.DelegateCall
: a delegated call.
This enables writing upgradeable contracts using thedelegate
pattern. An example has been added to demonstrate this:delegate-calls
.
This is a breaking change, users must now specify the call_type
to the builder manually.
If you want to keep existing behavior you just need to specify the type Call
now.
More details on this change can be found in #1133.
The API for eval_contract
and invoke_contract
changed. You can read more
about the change in #1165.
- Added
keep_attr
to#[ink::contract]
and#[ink::trait_definition]
‒ #1145 (thanks @xgreenx).. - Implemented the
seal_is_contract
andseal_caller_is_origin
API ‒ #1129 #1166. - Add tests in experimental off-chain env for
trait-erc20
‒ #1158. - Add tests in experimental off-chain env for
erc721
‒ #1157. - Add tests in experimental off-chain env for
multisig
‒ #1159. - Add tests in experimental off-chain env for
dns
‒ #1156. - Implemented chain extension testing in experimental off-chain env ‒ #1152.
- Replaced default off-chain testing engine with experimental one ‒ #1144.
- Changed
CallBuilder
API to now support delegate calls ‒ #1133 (thanks @VargSupercolony and @xgreenx). - Unify
ink_env::{eval_contract, invoke_contract}
‒ #1165.
This is the 9th release candidate for ink! 3.0.
This is a drastic breaking change; it was no easy decision for us.
It affects Lazy
and Memory
as well. The rationale behind this change,
as well as some notes on migrating existing contracts, are explained
in #1111 and
#1137.
If you used Memory
in your contract, you can achieve the same functionality
by passing this data via arguments. If you think there's a case to be
made for bringing it back, please get in contact with us.
If you use ink_storage::Mapping
in your contract, you need to initialize the data structure using the helper function
ink_lang::utils::initialize_contract(…)
.
For more code examples you can take a look at our examples, e.g.
erc20
.
In this release candidate we upgraded scale-info
and parity-scale-codec
. You have to use a compatible
version in your contract's Cargo.toml
as well; cargo-contract
will throw an error otherwise.
The Cargo.toml
should contain
scale-info = { version = "2", default-features = false, features = ["derive"], optional = true }
scale = { package = "parity-scale-codec", version = "3", default-features = false, features = ["derive", "full"] }
- Export
ink_lang::utils::initialize_contract(…)
- #1077. - Add
get_owner()
function todns
example contract - #1118 (thanks @agryaznov). - Improved usage documentation of
ink_storage::Mapping
- #1138.
- Updated to
parity-scale-codec = "3"
andscale-info = "2"
- #1132.
- Remove
collection
andlazy
modules from public ink! API - #1111. - Remove
Memory
from public ink! API - #1137.
- Fix bug with referencing two external trait definitions - #1141.
- Explicitly specify trait in dispatching - #1131 (thanks @xgreenx).
- Make
rust-analyzer
expand ink! macros without warning - #1107.
This is the 8th release candidate for ink! 3.0.
You need to upgrade to a new version of the contracts
pallet in order to use this
ink! release. Specifically we recommend you upgrade to at least the pallet version
249dbbb
(or newer than Jan 17, 2022).
For substrate-contracts-node
we just issued a new release v0.5.0
, which has been synchronized
to the latest Substrate master
and hence is compatible with this ink! release candidate.
Also, the metadata changed with this release, so you need to have a recent version of
the user interface you are using. For polkadot-js/api
and polkadot-js/apps
the metadata
changes are supported since Jan 19, 2022.
There are two metadata changes in this release candidate:
The messages and constructors exposed by a contract were previously denoted with
"name": ["foo", "bar"]
Now they are instead denoted with
"label": "foo"
For public contract methods that are implemented from a trait, the trait name is prefixed to
the method name with ::
as the separator. So e.g. trait_name::get_owner
.
The ink! PR which implemented this is #923,
for the polkadot-js/api
it was polkadot-js/api#4255.
Constructors now have to be specified payable
if it's intended for them to receive value
(i.e. tokens). This is a breaking change, beforehand they were by default payable,
now they are by default non-payable.
The ink! PR which implemented this is #1065, the PR that updated the ink!
metadata to V3 is #1100, and for the polkadot-js/api
it was polkadot-js/api#4432.
- Update metadata to support payable constructors - #1100.
- Make constructors non-payable by default, require specifying
payable
explicitly - #1065. - Renamed the error code
EcdsaRecoverFailed
toEcdsaRecoveryFailed
‒ #1064. - Renamed the
ink_env
functiontransferred_balance()
totransferred_value()
‒ #1063. - Removed the error codes
BelowSubsistenceThreshold
andNewContractNotFunded
‒ #1062. - Updated ink! to use the most recent
contracts
pallet API ‒ #1053. - Explicitly link against
rlibc
to get non-buggy version ofmemcpy
‒ #1049. - Changed the metadata field
name
tolabel
for messages and constructors ‒ #923 (thanks @xgreenx).
- Added a
remove
method to theMapping
data structure ‒ #1023.
This is the 7th release candidate for ink! 3.0.
Since our last release candidate we implemented a number of contract size improvements.
With those improvements the size of our erc20
example has reduced significantly:
Release Build with cargo-contract |
||
---|---|---|
erc20 |
3.0.0-rc6 |
29.3 K |
erc20 |
3.0.0-rc7 |
10.4 K |
The savings apply partly to our other examples; for erc20
they are most
significant since it has been migrated to use a new Mapping
data structure, which we introduce with this release candidate.
The other examples will be migrated to this new data structure as a next step.
You need to upgrade to a new version of the contracts
pallet in order to use
this ink! release. This is because we upgraded to a newer seal_call
API.
Specifically you need to upgrade to at least the pallet version
e9fca0f
(or newer than Nov 24).
- Removed the state rent API ‒ #1036.
- Added support for wildcard selectors ‒ #1020.
- This enables writing upgradeable smart contracts using the proxy/forward pattern. We added a new example to illustrate this ‒ the proxy example.
- Annotating a wildcard selector in traits is not supported.
- The ink! codegen now heavily relies on static type information based on traits defined in
ink_lang
‒ #665.- Some of those traits and their carried information can be used for static reflection of ink!
smart contracts. Those types and traits reside in the new
ink_lang::reflect
module and is publicly usable by ink! smart contract authors.
- Some of those traits and their carried information can be used for static reflection of ink!
smart contracts. Those types and traits reside in the new
- Upgraded to the
seal_call
v1 API ‒ #960.- This API now enables control over the behavior of cross-contract calls, e.g. to forward/clone input,
enable tail calls and control reentrancy.
The crate documentation contains more details on the
CallFlags
. - Note: The default behavior of cross-contract calls now disallows reentering the calling contract.
- This API now enables control over the behavior of cross-contract calls, e.g. to forward/clone input,
enable tail calls and control reentrancy.
The crate documentation contains more details on the
- ink! contract definitions via
#[ink::contract]
‒ #665.
For ink! smart contracts we now generate two contract types. GivenMyContract
:MyContract
will still be the storage struct. However, it can now additionally be used as static dependency in other smart contracts. Static dependencies can be envisioned as being directly embedded into a smart contract.MyContractRef
is pretty much the same of what we had gotten with the oldink-as-dependency
. It is a typed thin-wrapper around anAccountId
that is mirroring the ink! smart contract's API and implemented traits.
- ink! trait definitions via
#[ink::trait_definition]
‒ #665.- ink! trait definitions no longer can define trait constructors.
- ink! trait implementations now inherit
selector
andpayable
properties for trait messages.- Now explicitly setting
selector
orpayable
property for an implemented ink! trait method will only act as a guard that the set property is in fact the same as defined by the ink! trait definition.
- Now explicitly setting
- Improved some ink! specific compile errors ‒ #665.
- For example, when using ink! messages and constructors which have inputs (or outputs) that cannot be encoded (or decoded) using the SCALE codec.
- Simplified selector computation for ink! trait methods ‒ #665.
- Now selectors are encoded as
blake2b({namespace}::{trait_identifier}::{message_identifier})[0..4]
. If nonamespace
is set for the ink! trait definition then the formula isblake2b({trait_identifier}::{message_identifier})[0..4]
. Wheretrait_identifier
andmessage_identifier
both refer to the identifiers of the ink! trait definition and ink! trait message respectively.
- Now selectors are encoded as
- We switched to Rust edition 2021 ‒ #977.
- Update chain extension example to show argument passing ‒ #1029.
- Contracts now revert the transaction if an ink! message returns
Result::Err
‒ #975, #998.- It is still possible to match against a
Result
return type for a called dependency contract ‒ i.e. a sub-contract specified in the contract'sCargo.toml
.
- It is still possible to match against a
- We implemented a number of Wasm contract size improvements:
This is the 6th release candidate for ink! 3.0.
You need to update to the latest cargo-contract
in order to use this release:
cargo install cargo-contract --vers ^0.15 --force --locked
If you build contracts from this release candidate with an older cargo-contract
,
the UI's won't display all contract-relevant fields.
In this release candidate we upgraded scale-info
. You have to use a compatible
version in your contract's Cargo.toml
as well; cargo-contract
will throw
an error otherwise.
The Cargo.toml
should contain
scale-info = { version = "1.0", default-features = false, features = ["derive"], optional = true }
scale = { package = "parity-scale-codec", version = "2", default-features = false, features = ["derive", "full"] }
There are breaking changes to the metadata format in this release.
- Removes top level
metadataVersion
field from the contract metadata (https://github.com/paritytech/cargo-contract/pull/342/files). - Introduces new top level versioned metadata enum.
- Upgrades to
scale-info
version1.0
(use-ink#845).- The previous supported version was
0.6
, so check release notes for all changes since then: use-ink#845 - One of the main changes to be aware of is the change to 0 based type lookup ids: paritytech/scale-info#90
- The previous supported version was
- Added an Ethereum-compatibility function to recover a public key from an ECDSA signature and message hash - #914 (thanks @xgreenx).
- Added new utility proc. macros to
ink_lang
crate - #947:blake2!
: Compute the BLAKE2b 256-bit hash of the given input literal string.selector_bytes!
: Compute the ink! selector of the given input literal string and return it as[u8; 4]
.selector_id!
: Compute the ink! selector of the given input literal string and return it asu32
.
- Update to
scale-info
1.0 - #845. - Message and constructor selectors no longer take their inputs as string, but as
u32
decodable integer - #928.
For example:- It is no longer possible to specify a selector as
#[ink(selector = "0xC0DECAFE")]
. - The newly allowed formats are
#[ink(selector = 0xC0DECAFE)]
and#[ink(selector = 42)]
. - Smart contract authors are required to update their smart contracts for this change.
- It is no longer possible to specify a selector as
- Improved the
multisig
example - #962. - Changed the link to our beginner's workshop to the migrated workshop on
substrate.io
- #957.
- Fixed a mistake in the
ink_env::block_timestamp()
documentation - #937.
This is the 5th release candidate for ink! 3.0.
The list below shows the additions, changes and fixes that are visible to users of ink!.
Make sure to use a recent Rust nightly and cargo-contract
with the current release:
cargo install cargo-contract --vers ^0.14 --force --locked && rustup update
In the past we recommended using our canvas-node
for local contract development and testing. We've now migrated this node to be run
as a Parachain. This new setup comes with some additional overhead though (such as requiring
a local Polkadot installation); for local development this is often unnecessary.
We've therefore created a new project, the
substrate-contracts-node
.
It fulfills the same purpose the canvas-node
did before ‒ it's a standalone node which is
just Substrate's node-template
modified to include the contracts
pallet.
You can install the newest version like this:
cargo install contracts-node --git https://github.com/paritytech/substrate-contracts-node.git --force
After you've installed the node it can be run via substrate-contracts-node --tmp --dev
.
- Added example for mocking chain extensions in off-chain tests ‒ #882.
- Panic messages are now printed to debug buffer ‒ #894.
This is the 4th release candidate for ink! 3.0.
The list below shows the additions, changes and fixes that are visible to users of ink!.
ink! 3.0-rc4 is compatible with
- The "ink! CLI"
cargo-contract
version0.13.0
or newer.- Install the newest version using
cargo install --force cargo-contract
.
- Install the newest version using
- Substrate version
4.0.0-dev
including thecontracts-pallet
version4.0.0-dev
. substrate-contracts-node
version0.1.0
or newer.- Install the newest version using
cargo install contracts-node --git https://github.com/paritytech/substrate-contracts-node.git --force
.
- Install the newest version using
The documentation on our Documentation Portal is up-to-date with this release candidate. Since the last release candidate we notably added a number of Frequently Asked Questions there.
In order to ensure a continuously high quality of our codebase we implemented a number of key improvements to our testing setup:
- We've put an emphasis on automated testing of the usage examples in our crate documentation. Those are now tested in the context of a complete ink! contract. In the past this was not always the case, sometimes usage examples were just isolated code snippets.
- We started our
ink-waterfall
project, which runs End-to-End tests through our entire stack. All our examples are continuously built using the latestcargo-contract
. They are subsequently deployed on the latestsubstrate-contracts-node
by emulating browser interactions with both thecanvas-ui
and thepolkadot-js
UI. This testing setup enables us to detect bugs which only appear in the context of using multiple components together early on. - To improve the readability of our documentation we introduced automated grammar and spell checking into our Continuous Integration environment.
- Added support for the new
seal_random
API ‒ #734. - Added missing documentation for the
ink_storage_derive
procedural macros ‒ #711. - Implemented the (unstable)
seal_rent_params
API ‒ #755. - Implemented the (unstable)
seal_rent_status
API ‒ #798. - Implemented the (unstable)
seal_debug_message
API ‒ #792.- Printing debug messages can now be achieved via
ink_env::debug_println!(…)
. - See our documentation for more information.
- The examples have been updated to reflect this new way of printing debug messages.
- Printing debug messages can now be achieved via
- Added usage comments with code examples to the
ink_env
API ‒ #797.- The published crate documentation now contains
much more code examples for the methods behind
self.env()
andSelf::env()
.
- The published crate documentation now contains
much more code examples for the methods behind
- Added an example implementation for ERC-1155, a multi-token standard ‒ #800.
- Implemented binary search for
collections::Vec
‒ #836. - Added the ability of submitting payable transactions to the
multisig
example ‒ #820. - Implemented
Decode
forError
types in the examples, enabling building them as dependencies ‒ #761. - We started working on a new off-chain environment testing engine ‒ #712.
- The old testing environment has a number of limitations, which we are well aware of. We're confident that with the new testing engine we will be able to conduct much more elaborate testing in an emulated chain environment.
- For the moment, the new engine is unstable and only available behind a feature flag. A number of examples have already been converted to support the new testing engine.
- To reduce a contract's space footprint we switched the default allocator to a bump allocator implementation ‒ #831.
- A couple of readme's have been reworked:
- With the stabilization of Rust 1.51 we ware able to remove the
ink-unstable
feature, makingcollections::SmallVec
andlazy::LazyArray
available by default ‒ #746. - To resolve confusion, we migrated all usages of
#[test]
in our examples to#[ink::test]
‒ #746.- The difference is that
#[ink::test]
spawns an emulated chain environment (an "off-chain" environment) and hence comes with a bit of overhead. It was not always clear to users when they require an off-chain environment, we decided to mitigate this confusion by using an emulated chain environment for all our example tests.
- The difference is that
- With the stabilization of Rust's
min_const_generics
we were able to replace the fixed size implementations ofSpreadLayout
andPackedLayout
for Arrays. These traits are now implemented for all Arrays of sizeusize
‒ #754. - We were able to remove the pinned
funty
dependency ‒ #711. - The
contract-transfer
example has been improved for better UI support ‒ #789. - The
contract-transfer
example has been improved for better error handling ‒ #790.
- Catch illegal
struct
destructuring pattern in ink! message arguments ‒ #846. - Removed an erroneous
Salt
type in code generation for cross-contract calls ‒ #842. - Do not generate metadata if compiled as dependency ‒ #811.
- Fix execution context parameters in DNS example tests ‒ #723.
- Fixed the
Greeter
contract example from our doc comments ‒ #773.
This is the 3rd release candidate for ink! 3.0.
The list below shows the additions, changes and fixes that are visible to users of ink!.
ink! 3.0-rc3 is compatible with
- The
cargo-contract
CLI tool version0.9.1
or newer.- Install newest version using
cargo install --force cargo-contract
.
- Install newest version using
- Substrate version
3.0
including thecontracts-pallet
version3.0
.
- Implemented chain extensions feature for ink!.
- ink!'s official documentation portal: https://ink.substrate.io/
- It is now possible to pass a
salt
argument to contract instantiations. - Implemented fuzz testing for the ink! codebase.
- Migrate
ink_storage::SmallVec
andink_storage::lazy::SmallLazyArray
to usemin_const_generics
.- The
min_const_generics
feature is going to be stabilized in Rust 1.51. For now it was put behind theink-unstable
crate feature of theink_storage
crate.
- The
- Improve error reporting for conflicting ink! attributes.
- Improve error reporting for invalid constructor or message selector. (use-ink#561)
- Remove
iter_mut
forink_storage::BinaryHeap
data structure. - Add documented demonstration how to properly mock
transferred_balance
calls: use-ink#555 - Add contract example which uses
ext_transfer
andext_terminate
: use-ink#554 - Improve documentation of
transfer
andminimum_balance
APIs: use-ink#540
- The Delegator example contract now compiles properly using the
build-all.sh
bash script. - Update crate dependencies:
scale-info 0.6
parity-scale-codec 2.0
rand 0.8
itertools 0.10
- Remove unused
tiny-keccak
dependency fromink_primitives
. - Changed the default
BlockNumber
type tou32
. This is a fix since it now properly mirrors Substrate's defaultBlockNumber
type. - Ensure topics are unique: use-ink#594
- Several fixes for
ink_storage
data structures, including:Drop
implementation forPack
now works properly. (use-ink#600)Drop
implementation forLazy
now always properly clean up storage. (use-ink#597)- Nested
Lazy
now properly clears storage data. (use-ink#583) Option
fields now properly clean up nested storage data. (use-ink#570)
This is the 2nd release candidate for ink! 3.0.
On top of the changes introduced in the first release candidate for ink! 3.0 we introduced the following improvements, new features and bug fixes:
- The
ink_storage
crate now comes with a newBinaryHeap
data structure that has a very similar interface to the well known Rust standard libraryBinaryHeap
. It features specific optimizations to reduce the storage reads and writes required for its operations. - Fixed a bug with
ink_storage::Lazy
that corrupted the storage of other storage data structures if it was unused in a contract execution. - The
ink_storage::alloc::Box
type now implementsscale_info::TypeInfo
which now allows it to be fully used inside other storage data structures such asink_storage::collections::Vec
. The missing of this implementation was considered a bug. - The
LazyHashMap
low-level storage abstraction is now re-exported from within theink_storage::lazy
module and docs are inlined. - Added note about the
ink_core
split intoink_env
andink_storage
crates to the release notes of ink! 3.0-rc1. - The
Cargo.toml
documentation now properly links to the one deployed at docs.rs. On top of that crate level documentation for theink_allocator
crate has been added. - Add new ERC-20 example contract based on a trait implementation. Also modernized the old non-trait based ERC-20 example token contract.
Be prepared for the ink! 3.0 release notes because the whole version was basically a rewrite of all the major components that make up ink!. With our experience gained from previous releases of ink! we were able to detect weak spots of the design and provided ink! with more tools, more features and more efficiency as ever. Read more below …
In the 3.0 update we further explored the space for ink! to just feel like it was plain Rust. With this in mind we changed the syntax slightly in order to better map from ink! to the generated Rust code. So what users see is mostly what will be generated by ink! later.
In this vein #[ink(storage)]
and #[ink(event)]
structs as well as #[ink(message)]
and
#[ink(constructor)]
methods now need to be specified with public visibility (pub
).
The #[ink(constructors)]
syntax also changes and no longer uses a &mut self
receiver but
now follows the natural Rust constructors scheme. So it is no longer possible to shoot
yourself in the foot by accidentally forgetting to initialize some important data structures.
Old ink! 2.0:
#[ink(constructor)]
fn new_erc20(&mut self, initial_supply: Balance) {
let caller = self.env().caller();
self.total_supply.set(initial_supply);
self.balances.insert(caller, initial_supply);
}
New ink! 3.0:
#[ink(constructor)]
pub fn new_erc20(initial_supply: Balance) -> Self {
let caller = self.env().caller();
let mut balances = ink_storage::HashMap::new();
balances.insert(caller, initial_supply);
Self {
total_supply: initial_supply,
balances,
}
}
Also ink! 3.0 no longer requires a mandatory version
field in the header of the ink! module attribute.
Syntactically this is all it takes to port your current ink! smart contracts over to ink! 3.0 syntax.
The ink_core
crate no longer exists. It has been split into the new ink_env
and ink_storage
crates.
Everything that was previously accessed through ink_core::env
now lives in ink_env
and everything
that was previously accessed through ink_core::storage
now lives in ink_storage
. Both crates keep
the responsibilities of their former originating ink_core
modules.
The storage module has been reworked entirely.
Also it no longer lives in the ink_core
crate but instead is defined as its own ink_storage
crate.
In a sense it acts as the standard storage library for ink! smart contracts in that it provides all the necessary tools and data structures to organize and operate the contract's storage intuitively and efficiently.
The most fundamental change in how you should think about data structures provided by the new ink_storage
crate is that they are inherently lazy. We will explain what this means below!
The ink_storage
crate provides high-level and low-level lazy data structures.
The difference between high-level and low-level lies in the distinction in how these data structures are aware
of the elements that they operate on. For high-level data structures they are fully aware about the elements
they contains, do all the clean-up by themselves so the user can concentrate on the business logic.
For low-level data structures the responsibility about the elements lies in the hands of the contract author.
Also they operate on cells (Option<T>
) instead of entities of type T
.
But what does that mean exactly?
The new ink_storage::Lazy
type is what corresponds the most to the old ink_core::storage::Value
type. Both cache their entities and both act lazily on the storage. This means that a read or write operation is only performed when it really needs to in order to satisfy other inputs.
Data types such as Rust primitives i32
or Rust's very own Vec
or data structures can also be used to operate on the contract's storage, however, they will load their contents eagerly which is often not what you want.
An example follows with the below contract storage and a message that operates on either of the two fields.
#[ink(storage)]
pub struct TwoValues {
offset: i32,
a: i32,
b: i32,
}
impl TwoValues {
#[ink(message)]
pub fn set(&mut self, which: bool, new_value: i32) {
match which {
true => { self.a = self.offset + new_value; },
false => { self.b = self.offset + new_value; },
}
}
}
Whenever we call TwoValues::set
always both a
and b
are loaded despite the fact the we only operate on one of them at a time. This is very costly since storage accesses are in fact database look-ups.
In order to prevent this eager loading of storage contents we can make use of ink_storage::Lazy
or other lazy data structures defined in that crate:
#[ink(storage)]
pub struct TwoValues {
offset: i32,
a: ink_storage::Lazy<i32>,
b: ink_storage::Lazy<i32>,
}
impl TwoValues {
#[ink(message)]
pub fn set(&mut self, which: bool, new_value: i32) {
match which {
true => { self.a = offset + new_value; },
false => { self.b = offset + new_value; },
}
}
}
Now a
and b
are only loaded when the contract really needs their values.
Note that offset
remained i32
since it is always needed and could spare the minor overhead of the ink_storage::Lazy
wrapper.
In the follow we explore the differences between the high-level ink_storage::collections::HashMap
and the low-level ink_storage::lazy::LazyHashMap
. Both provide very similar functionality in that they map some generic key to some storage entity.
However, their APIs look very different. Whereas the HashMap
provides a rich and high-level API that is comparable to that of Rust's very own HashMap
, the LazyHashMap
provides only a fraction of the API and also operates on Option<T>
values types instead of T
directly. It is more similar Solidity mappings than to Rust's HashMap
.
The fundamental difference of both data structures is that HashMap
is aware of the keys that have been stored in it and thus can reconstruct exactly which elements and storage regions apply to it. This enables it to provide iteration and automated deletion as well as efficient way to defragment its underlying storage to free some storage space again. This goes very well in the vein of Substrate's storage rent model where contracts have to pay for the storage they are using.
Data Structure | level of abstraction | caching | lazy | element type | container |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T |
- | yes | no | T |
primitive value |
Lazy<T> |
high-level | yes | yes | T |
single element container |
LazyCell<T> |
low-level | yes | yes | Option<T> |
single element, no container |
Vec<T> |
high-level | yes | yes | T |
Rust vector-like container |
LazyIndexMap<T> |
low-level | yes | yes | Option<T> |
similar to Solidity mapping |
HashMap<K, V> |
high-level | yes | yes | V (key type K ) |
Rust map-like container |
LazyHashMap<K, V> |
low-level | yes | yes | Option<V> (key type K ) |
similar to Solidity mapping |
There are many more! For more information about the specifics please take a look into the ink_storage
crate documentation.
Storing or loading complex data structures to and from contract storage can be done in many different ways. You could store all information into a single storage cell or you could try to store all information into as many different cells as possible. Both strategies have pros and cons under different conditions.
For example it might be a very good idea to store all the information under the same cell if all the information is very compact. For example when we are dealing with a byte vector that is expected to never be larger than approx a thousand elements it would probably be more efficient if we store all those thousand bytes in the same cell and especially if we often access many of those (or all) in our contract messages.
On the other hand spreading information across as many cells as possible might be much more efficient if we are dealing with big data structures, a lot of information that is not compact, or when messages that operate on the data always only need a small fraction of the whole data. An example for this use case is if you have a vector of user accounts where each account stores potentially a lot of information, e.g. a 32-byte hash etc and where our messages only every operate on only a few of those at a time.
The ink_storage
crate provides the user full control over the strategy or a mix of these two root strategies through some fundamental abstractions that we are briefly presenting to you.
By default ink! spreads information to as many cells as possible. For example if you have the following #[ink(storage)]
struct every field will live in its own single storage cell. Note that for c
all 32 bytes will share the same cell!
#[ink(storage)]
pub struct Spreaded {
a: i32,
b: ink_storage::Lazy<i32>,
c: [u8; 32],
}
We can alter this behavior by using the ink_storage::Pack
abstraction:
pub struct Spreaded {
a: i32,
b: ink_storage::Lazy<i32>,
c: [u8; 32],
}
#[ink(storage)]
pub struct Packed {
packed: ink_storage::Pack<Spreaded>,
}
Now all fields of Spreaded
will share the same storage cell. This means whenever one of them is stored to or loaded from the contract storage, all of them are stored or loaded. A user has to choose wisely what mode of operation is more suitable for their contract.
These abstractions can be combined in various ways, yielding full control to the users. For example, in the following only a
and b
share a common storage cell while c
lives in its own:
pub struct Spreaded {
a: i32,
b: ink_storage::Lazy<i32>,
}
#[ink(storage)]
pub struct Packed {
packed: ink_storage::Pack<Spreaded>,
c: [u8; 32],
}
If we prefer to store all bytes of c
into their own storage cell we can make use of the SmallVec
data structure. The SmallVec
is a high-level data structure that allows to efficiently organize a fixed number of elements similar to a Rust array. However, unlike a Rust array it acts lazily upon the storage and spreads its elements into different cells.
use typenum::U32;
pub struct Spreaded {
a: i32,
b: ink_storage::Lazy<i32>,
}
#[ink(storage)]
pub struct Packed {
packed: ink_storage::Pack<Spreaded>,
c: SmallVec<u8, U32>,
}
If you are in need of storing some temporary information across method and message boundaries ink! will have your back with the ink_storage::Memory
abstraction. It allows you to simply opt-out of using the storage for the wrapped entity at all and thus is very similar to Solidity's very own memory
annotation.
An example below:
#[ink(storage)]
pub struct OptedOut {
a: i32,
b: ink_storage::Lazy<i32>,
c: ink_storage::Memory<i32>,
}
The the above example a
and b
are normal storage entities, however, c
on the other hand side will never load from or store to contract storage and will always be reset to the default value of its i32
type for every contract call.
It can be accessed from all ink! messages or methods via self.c
but will never manipulate the contract storage and thus acts wonderfully as some shared local information.
In the previous section we have seen how the default mode of operation is to spread information and how we can opt-in to packing information into single cells via ink_storage::Packed
.
However, what if we wanted to store a vector of a vector of i32
for example?
Naturally a user would try to construct this as follows:
use ink_storage::Vec as StorageVec;
#[ink(storage)]
pub struct Matrix {
values: StorageVec<StorageVec<i32>>,
}
However, this will fail compilation with an error indicating that StorageVec<T>
requires for its T
to be packed (T: PackedLayout
) which StorageVec<T>
itself does not since it always stores all of its elements into different cells. The same applies to many other storage data structures provided by ink_storage
and is a trade-off the ink! team decided for the case of efficiency of the overall system.
Instead what a user can do in order to get their vector-of-vector to be working is to make use of ink!'s dynamic storage allocator capabilities.
For this the contract author has to first enable the feature via:
use ink_lang as ink;
#[ink::contract(dynamic_storage_allocator = true)]
mod matrix {
// contract code ...
}
And then we can define our Matrix
#[ink(storage)]
as follows:
use ink_storage::{
Vec as StorageVec,
Box as StorageBox,
};
#[ink(storage)]
pub struct Matrix {
values: StorageVec<StorageBox<StorageVec<i32>>>,
}
With ink_storage::Box<T>
we can use a T: SpreadLayout
as if it was T: PackedLayout
since the ink_storage::Box<T>
itself suffices the requirements and can be put into a single contract storage cell. The whole concept works quite similar to how Rust's Box
works: by an indirection - contract authors are therefore advised to make use of dynamic storage allocator capabilities only if other ways of dealing with ones problems are not applicable.
While the ink_storage
crate provides tons of useful utilities and data structures to organize and manipulate the contract's storage contract authors are not limited by its capabilities. By implementing the core SpreadLayout
and PackedLayout
traits users are able to define their very own custom storage data structures with their own set of requirement and features that work along the ink_storage
data structures as long as they fulfill the mere requirements stated by those two traits.
In the future we plan on providing some more ink! workshops and tutorials guiding the approach to design and implement a custom storage data structure.
The new ink_storage
crate provides everything you need to operate on your contract's storage.
There are low-level and high-level data structures depending on your need of control.
All provided data structures operate lazily on the contract's storage and cache their reads and writes for a more gas efficient storage access.
Users should prefer high-level data structures found in the collections
module over the low-level data structures found in the lazy
module.
For a list of all the new storage data structure visit ink_storage
's documentation.
For ink! 3.0 we have added some more useful ink! specific attributes to the table.
All of these ink! attributes are available to specify inside an ink! module.
An ink! module is the module that is flagged by #[ink::contract]
containing all the ink! definitions:
use ink_lang as ink;
#[ink::contract]
mod erc20 {
#[ink(storage)]
pub struct Erc20 { ... }
impl Erc20 {
#[ink(constructor)]
pub fn new(initial_supply: Balance) -> Self { .. }
#[ink(constructor)]
pub fn total_supply(&self) -> Balance { .. }
// etc. ...
}
}
We won't be going into the details for any of those but will briefly present the entire set of ink! specific attributes below:
Attribute | Where Applicable | Description |
---|---|---|
#[ink(storage)] |
On struct definitions. |
Defines the ink! storage struct. There can only be one ink! storage definition per contract. |
#[ink(event)] |
On struct definitions. |
Defines an ink! event. A contract can define multiple such ink! events. |
#[ink(anonymous)] new |
Applicable to ink! events. | Tells the ink! codegen to treat the ink! event as anonymous which omits the event signature as topic upon emitting. Very similar to anonymous events in Solidity. |
#[ink(topic)] |
Applicate on ink! event field. | Tells the ink! codegen to provide a topic hash for the given field. Every ink! event can only have a limited number of such topic field. Similar semantics as to indexed event arguments in Solidity. |
#[ink(message)] |
Applicable to methods. | Flags a method for the ink! storage struct as message making it available to the API for calling the contract. |
#[ink(constructor)] |
Applicable to method. | Flags a method for the ink! storage struct as constructor making it available to the API for instantiating the contract. |
#[ink(payable)] new |
Applicable to ink! messages. | Allows receiving value as part of the call of the ink! message. ink! constructors are implicitly payable. |
#[ink(selector = "..")] new |
Applicable to ink! messages and ink! constructors. | Specifies a concrete dispatch selector for the flagged entity. This allows a contract author to precisely control the selectors of their APIs making it possible to rename their API without breakage. |
#[ink(namespace = "..")] new |
Applicable to ink! trait implementation blocks. | Changes the resulting selectors of all the ink! messages and ink! constructors within the trait implementation. Allows to disambiguate between trait implementations with overlapping message or constructor names. Use only with great care and consideration! |
#[ink(impl)] new |
Applicable to ink! implementation blocks. | Tells the ink! codegen that some implementation block shall be granted access to ink! internals even without it containing any ink! messages or ink! constructors. |
It is possible to merge attributes that share a common flagged entity. The example below demonstrates this for a payable message with a custom selector.
#[ink(message)]
#[ink(payable)]
#[ink(selector = "0xCAFEBABE")]
pub fn transfer(&mut self, from: AccountId, to: AccountId, value: Balance) -> Result<(), Error> {
// actual implementation
}
We can also write the above ink! message definition in the following way:
#[ink(message, payable, selector = "0xCAFEBABE")]
pub fn transfer(&mut self, from: AccountId, to: AccountId, value: Balance) -> Result<(), Error> {
// actual implementation
}
One of the most anticipated features of ink! 3.0 is its Rust trait support.
Through the new #[ink::trait_definition]
procedural macro it is now possible to define your very own trait definitions that are then implementable by ink! smart contracts.
This allows to define shared smart contract interfaces to different concrete implementations. Note that this ink! trait definition can be defined anywhere, even in another crate!
Defined in the base_erc20.rs
module.
use ink_lang as ink;
#[ink::trait_definition]
pub trait BaseErc20 {
/// Creates a new ERC-20 contract and initializes it with the initial supply for the instantiator.
#[ink(constructor)]
fn new(initial_supply: Balance) -> Self;
/// Returns the total supply.
#[ink(message)]
fn total_supply(&self) -> Balance;
/// Transfers `amount` from caller to `to`.
#[ink(message, payable)]
fn transfer(&mut self, to: AccountId, amount: Balance);
}
An ink! smart contract definition can then implement this trait definition as follows:
use ink_lang as ink;
#[ink::contract]
mod erc20 {
use base_erc20::BaseErc20;
#[ink(storage)]
pub struct Erc20 {
total_supply: Balance,
// more fields ...
}
impl BaseErc20 for Erc20 {
#[ink(constructor)]
fn new(initial_supply: Balance) -> Self {
// implementation ...
}
#[ink(message)]
fn total_supply(&self) -> Balance {
// implementation ...
}
#[ink(message, payable)]
fn transfer(&mut self, to: AccountId, amount: Balance) {
// implementation ...
}
}
}
Calling the above Erc20
explicitely through its trait implementation can be done just as if it was normal Rust code:
// --- Instantiating the ERC-20 contract:
//
let mut erc20 = <Erc20 as BaseErc20>::new(1000);
// --- Is just the same as:
use base_erc20::BaseErc20;
let mut erc20 = Erc20::new(1000);
// --- Retrieving the total supply:
//
assert_eq!(<Erc20 as BaseErc20>::total_supply(&erc20), 1000);
// --- Is just the same as:
use base_erc20::BaseErc20;
assert_eq!(erc20.total_supply(), 1000);
There are still many limitations to ink! trait definitions and trait implementations. For example it is not possible to define associated constants or types or have default implemented methods. These limitations exist because of technical intricacies, however, please expect that many of those will be tackled in future ink! releases.
- Add built-in support for cryptographic hashes:
- Blake2 with 128-bit and 256-bit
- Sha2 with 256-bit
- Keccak with 256-bit
- Add
ink_core::hash
module for high-level API to the new built-in hashes. - Update
runtime-storage
example ink! smart contract to demonstrate the new built-in hashes.
The ink! version 2.0 syntax has one major philosophy:
Just. Be. Rust.
To accomplish this, we take advantage of all the standard Rust types and structures and use attribute macros to tag these standard structures to be different parts of the ink! language.
Anything that is not tagged with an #[ink(...)]
attribute tag is just standard Rust, and can be
used in and out of your contract just like standard Rust could be used!
Every valid ink! contract is required to have at least one #[ink(constructor)]
, at least one
#[ink(message)]
and exactly one #[ink(storage)]
attribute.
Follow the instructions below to understand how to migrate your ink! 1.0 contracts to this new ink! 2.0 syntax.
Install the latest ink! CLI using the following command:
cargo install --git https://github.com/paritytech/cargo-contract cargo-contract --force
There is a new contract metadata format you need to use. You can generate the metadata using:
cargo contract generate-metadata
This will generate a file metadata.json
you should upload when deploying or interacting with a
contract.
The fundamental change with the new ink! syntax is how we declare a new contract.
We used to wrap the whole ink! contract into a contract!
macro. At that point, all syntax within
the macro could be custom, and in our first iteration of the language, we used that in ways that
made our code not really Rust anymore.
Now we wrap the whole contract in a standard Rust module, and include an attribute tag to identify this object as part of the ink! language. This means that all of our code from this point forward will be valid Rust!
Before | After |
---|---|
contract! {
...
} |
use ink_lang as ink;
#[ink::contract(version = "0.1.0")]
mod erc20 {
...
} |
Note: we now require a mandatory ink! version in the header. You're welcome.
See the ERC20 example.
The ink! contract tag can be extended to provide other configuration information about your contract.
We used to define types using a special #![env = DefaultSrmlTypes]
tag.
Now we simply include the type definition in the #[ink::contract(...)]
tag:
#[ink::contract(version = "0.1.0", env = MyCustomTypes)]
By default, we use DefaultSrmlTypes
, so you don't need to define anything unless you plan to use
custom types.
It is possible to enable the dynamic environment that allows for dynamic allocations by specifying
dynamic_allocations = true
in the parameters of the ink! header. This is disabled by default.
#[ink::contract(version = "0.1.0", dynamic_allocations = true)]
Note: The dynamic environment is still under research and not yet stable.
We define storage items just the same as before, but now we need to add the #[ink(storage)]
attribute tag.
Before | After |
---|---|
struct Erc20 {
total_supply: storage::Value<Balance>,
balances: storage::HashMap<AccountId, Balance>,
allowances: storage::HashMap<(AccountId, AccountId), Balance>,
} |
#[ink(storage)]
struct Erc20 {
total_supply: storage::Value<Balance>,
balances: storage::HashMap<AccountId, Balance>,
allowances: storage::HashMap<(AccountId, AccountId), Balance>,
} |
See the ERC20 example.
To update your events, you need to:
- Change the old
event
keyword to a standard Ruststruct
. - Add the
#[ink(event)]
attribute tag to yourstruct
.
If you were previously indexing the items in your event with #[indexed]
:
- Add the
#[ink(topic)]
attribute tag to each item in your event.
Before | After |
---|---|
event Transfer {
from: Option<AccountId>,
to: Option<AccountId>,
#[indexed]
value: Balance,
} |
#[ink(event)]
struct Transfer {
from: Option<AccountId>,
to: Option<AccountId>,
#[ink(topic)]
value: Balance,
} |
See the ERC20 example.
EnvHandler
is no longer exposed to the user and instead the environment is now always accessed via
self.env()
.
Before | After |
---|---|
Getting the caller: let caller = env.caller(); Emitting an event: env.emit(...) |
Getting the caller: let caller = self.env().caller(); Emitting an event: self.env().emit_event(...) |
Note: The name of the function used to emit an event was updated to
emit_event
.
We used to use pub(external)
to tag functions that could be called by the outside world.
We now simply add the attribute #[ink(message)]
.
Before | After |
---|---|
pub(external) fn total_supply(&self) -> Balance {
*self.total_supply
} |
#[ink(message)]
fn total_supply(&self) -> Balance {
*self.total_supply
} |
See the ERC20 example.
We used to define our constructor by implementing the Deploy
trait and defining the deploy
function.
But now our constructor function is in the same place as the rest of our contract functions, within the general implementation of the storage struct.
We tag these functions with the #[ink(constructor)]
attribute. We can create multiple different
constructors by simply creating more functions with the same tag. You can name a constructor
function whatever you want (except starting with __ink
which is reserved for all functions).
Before | After |
---|---|
impl Deploy for Erc20 {
fn deploy(&mut self, init_supply: Balance) {
let caller = env.caller();
self.total_supply.set(init_value);
self.balances.insert(caller, init_supply);
env.emit(Transfer {
from: None,
to: Some(env.caller()),
value: init_value
});
}
} |
impl Erc20 {
#[ink(constructor)]
fn new(&mut self, initial_supply: Balance) {
let caller = self.env().caller();
self.total_supply.set(initial_supply);
self.balances.insert(caller, initial_supply);
self.env().emit_event(Transferred {
from: None,
to: Some(caller),
amount: initial_supply,
});
}
} |
See the ERC20 example.
It is now possible to call ink! messages and ink! constructors. So ink! constructors allow delegation and ink! messages can easily call other ink! messages.
Given another ink! contract like mod Adder { ... }
, we can call any of its functions:
use adder::Adder;
//--snip--
#[ink(storage)]
struct Delegator {
adder: storage::Value<Adder>,
}
//--snip--
let result = self.adder.inc(by);
See the delegator example.
Creation of other contracts from a factory contract works pretty much the same way it did in the old ink! language.
However, users are now required to specify the code_hash
separately rather than in the
constructor:
.using_code(code_hash)
Also, they need to specify the used ink! environment (most likely self.env()
):
create_using(self.env())
Before | After |
---|---|
let accumulator = Accumulator::new(accumulator_code_hash, init_value)
.value(total_balance / 4)
.create()
.expect("failed at instantiating the accumulator contract"); |
let accumulator = Accumulator::new(init_value)
.value(total_balance / 4)
.gas_limit(12345)
.using_code(accumulator_code_hash)
.create_using(self.env())
.expect("failed at instantiating the `Accumulator` contract"); |
See the delegator example.
Testing contracts off-chain is done by cargo test
and users can simply use the standard routines
of creating unit test modules within the ink! project:
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn my_test() { ... }
}
Test instances of contracts can be created with something like:
let contract = MyContract::my_constructor(a, b);
Messages can simply be called on the returned instance as if MyContract::my_constructor
returns a
Self
instance.
See the flipper example.
The off-chain test environment has lost a bit of power compared to the old ink! language.
It is not currently possible to query and set special test data about the environment (such as the caller of a function or amount of value sent), but these will be added back in the near future.
It is also possible to annotate an entire impl
blocks with:
#[ink(impl)]
impl Contract {
fn internal_function(&self) {
self.env().emit_event(EventName);
}
}.
This is useful if the impl
block itself does not contain any ink! constructors or messages, but you
still need to access some of the "magic" provided by ink!. In the example above, you would not have
access to emit_event
without #[ink(impl)]
.