Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Revert test data for WithSlug variation (#62579)" #62587

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 18, 2024

Conversation

oandregal
Copy link
Member

@oandregal oandregal commented Jun 14, 2024

Reverts #62579
Follow-up to #62550

This PR brings back one test we had to put in quarantine to unblock other PRs from lading.

@oandregal oandregal self-assigned this Jun 14, 2024
@oandregal oandregal added the [Type] Bug An existing feature does not function as intended label Jun 14, 2024
Copy link

This pull request has changed or added PHP files. Please confirm whether these changes need to be synced to WordPress Core, and therefore featured in the next release of WordPress.

If so, it is recommended to create a new Trac ticket and submit a pull request to the WordPress Core GitHub repository soon after this pull request is merged.

If you're unsure, you can always ask for help in the #core-editor channel in WordPress Slack.

Thank you! ❤️

View changed files
❔ phpunit/data/themedir1/block-theme/styles/block-style-variation-with-slug.json
❔ phpunit/block-supports/block-style-variations-test.php
❔ phpunit/class-wp-theme-json-resolver-test.php

@aaronrobertshaw
Copy link
Contributor

I've had another session attempting to ascertain why this test causes the seemingly unrelated test to fail but haven't had any success yet. I'll need to revisit this later this week as there are a few other fixes that need to land in time for WP6.6 beta 3.

@tellthemachines
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not entirely sure what's happening here, but all these tests seem to be using the same block-theme so perhaps the problem can be avoided by creating a new theme specifically to test the block style variations on.

@aaronrobertshaw
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not entirely sure what's happening here, but all these tests seem to be using the same block-theme so perhaps the problem can be avoided by creating a new theme specifically to test the block style variations on.

That's definitely possible. I'd like to understand why it's causing the failure in a seemingly unrelated test to make sure I'm not missing some deeper issue.

It's also worth noting that the block-theme already has a couple of block style variations in it. There's something about this use case. It's also odd that the test passes fine in core.

Copy link
Contributor

@andrewserong andrewserong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This might be a stretch, but just thinking out loud while testing locally:

The resolver tests include some more detailed cache resets after they're run to ensure that resolver caching is cleared for subsequent tests:

public static function set_up_before_class() {

However, the test in this PR is for WP_Block_Supports_Block_Style_Variations_Test, but the test in question uses the resolver class. Do we need to copy over any of the resolver's cleanup logic to ensure the resolver's cache doesn't have any stale values in its static properties, after the block style variations tests are concluded?

I'm mostly wondering this because if I just test the block editor settings class locally, all tests pass for me:

npm run test:unit:php:base -- --filter Gutenberg_REST_Block_Editor_Settings_Controller_Test

However I get the test failure as in CI when I run all the tests:

npm run test:unit:php:base

So it feels like there are stale values happening somewhere here 🤔

@oandregal oandregal force-pushed the fix/withslug-error-on-block-settings-endpoint branch from 23b2851 to b879472 Compare June 17, 2024 16:47
@oandregal oandregal added the No Core Sync Required Indicates that any changes do not need to be synced to WordPress Core label Jun 17, 2024
@oandregal
Copy link
Member Author

Do we need to copy over any of the resolver's cleanup logic to ensure the resolver's cache doesn't have any stale values in its static properties, after the block style variations tests are concluded?

I gave this a shot and it works — locally. Pushed to see what CI thinks of it.

Quickly looking at what those setup/teardown functions do, it makes sense they are related: clearing the resolver caches make them to be fresh for the next test. For example, block metadata, would no longer hold any WithSlug variation previously registered. Not super familiar with them, so I'd appreciate if anyone gave them a second look and tweak as necessary.

@oandregal oandregal marked this pull request as ready for review June 17, 2024 16:52
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 17, 2024

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

If you're merging code through a pull request on GitHub, copy and paste the following into the bottom of the merge commit message.

Co-authored-by: oandregal <oandregal@git.wordpress.org>
Co-authored-by: andrewserong <andrewserong@git.wordpress.org>
Co-authored-by: aaronrobertshaw <aaronrobertshaw@git.wordpress.org>
Co-authored-by: tellthemachines <isabel_brison@git.wordpress.org>
Co-authored-by: ramonjd <ramonopoly@git.wordpress.org>

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

Copy link
Contributor

@andrewserong andrewserong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, glad that approach worked! Resetting the cache in this way sounds like the right way to go to me, and it matches what was in the resolver tests. If we run into any issues further down the track, I suppose we could look at also attempting to reset the 'theme' and 'user' properties, but for now, since this gets the tests passing again, I think this looks good to go.

LGTM 🚀

@ramonjd
Copy link
Member

ramonjd commented Jun 18, 2024

I tested with and without b879472 and the caching trick works. Good one @andrewserong !

I'll go ahead and merge this.

I suppose we could look at also attempting to reset the 'theme' and 'user' properties, but for now, since this gets the tests passing again

Was WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_Gutenberg::clean_cached_data() not an option? It resets core, user, theme and more.

public static function clean_cached_data() {

@ramonjd
Copy link
Member

ramonjd commented Jun 18, 2024

Was WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_Gutenberg::clean_cached_data() not an option? It resets core, user, theme and more.

Seems to work locally (running in tear_down() between tests) - I can create a new PR to test it in CI

@andrewserong
Copy link
Contributor

Was WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_Gutenberg::clean_cached_data() not an option? It resets core, user, theme and more.

Gosh, that looks like an obvious method to try now!

Feel free to merge this as-is and we can try that as a follow-up. (Or we can push that change and try it now, whichever you prefer).

@ramonjd
Copy link
Member

ramonjd commented Jun 18, 2024

Oh, I just saw that tear_down() has always called _gutenberg_clean_theme_json_caches(), which calls WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_Gutenberg::clean_cached_data() 🤔 so maybe I'll try in another PR, perhaps in teardown class or something seeing as this one works for now.

Cheers!

@ramonjd ramonjd merged commit 2fdcec7 into trunk Jun 18, 2024
66 of 67 checks passed
@ramonjd ramonjd deleted the fix/withslug-error-on-block-settings-endpoint branch June 18, 2024 02:03
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the Gutenberg 18.7 milestone Jun 18, 2024
@ramonjd
Copy link
Member

ramonjd commented Jun 18, 2024

WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver_Gutenberg::clean_cached_data() 🤔 so maybe I'll try in another PR, perhaps in teardown class or something seeing as this one works for now.

Well, this is fun. That works fine.

But now I've removed the caching changes completely in #62637 and the tests pass on CI and locally. 🤷🏻

@andrewserong
Copy link
Contributor

But now I've removed the caching changes completely in #62637 and the tests pass on CI and locally. 🤷🏻

🤯 that's very confusing 🤔

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
No Core Sync Required Indicates that any changes do not need to be synced to WordPress Core [Type] Bug An existing feature does not function as intended
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants