-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check nSpendsSapling, nOutputsSapling, and nActionsOrchard 2^16 limit #3069
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 task
The macOS failure is unrelated, PR #3072 should fix it. |
jvff
suggested changes
Nov 18, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if less than or less than equal to should be used in the assertion 🤔
Co-authored-by: Janito Vaqueiro Ferreira Filho <janito.vff@gmail.com>
…check-spends-outputs-actions-limits
jvff
approved these changes
Nov 18, 2021
3 tasks
2 tasks
4 tasks
mpguerra
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2023
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2023
* ZIPs were updated to remove ambiguity, this was tracked in #1267. * #2105 was fixed by #3039 and #2379 was closed by #3069 * #2230 was a duplicate of #2231 which was closed by #2511 * #3235 was obsoleted by #2156 which was fixed by #3505 * #1850 was fixed by #2944, #1851 was fixed by #2961 and #2902 was fixed by #2969 * We migrated to Rust 2021 edition in Jan 2022 with #3332 * #1631 was closed as not needed * #338 was fixed by #3040 and #1162 was fixed by #3067 * #2079 was fixed by #2445 * #4794 was fixed by #6122 * #1678 stopped being an issue * #3151 was fixed by #3934 * #3204 was closed as not needed * #1213 was fixed by #4586 * #1774 was closed as not needed * #4633 was closed as not needed * Clarify behaviour of difficulty spacing Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net> * Update comment to reflect implemented behaviour Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net> * Update comment to reflect implemented behaviour when retrying block downloads Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net> * Update `TODO` to remove closed issue and clarify when we might want to fix Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net> * Update `TODO` to remove closed issue and clarify what we might want to change in future Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net> * Clarify benefits of how we do block verification Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net> * Fix rustfmt errors --------- Co-authored-by: teor <teor@riseup.net>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
The spec says
While the check is redudant, it seems useful to add a sanity check to make sure it's being enforced.
Specifications
Designs
Solution
Add static assertions to the current limits (which are derived from the block size) to make sure they are not greater than 2^16.
Closes #2379
Review
Anyone can review. Not urgent.
Closes #2379
Reviewer Checklist
Follow Up Work