-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 665
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] tox currently doesn't parse deps with comments well #1973
Comments
6 tasks
tox-dev/tox#1262 will fix this issue once merged. |
OK, this appears to be the reason for our broken CI right now. I assume waiting for a release of Tox will take too long (and them fixing their CI), so let's get a stop gap fix we can put in place now to get us back to a running CI without this issue. |
decentral1se
added a commit
to decentral1se/molecule
that referenced
this issue
Apr 16, 2019
An interim fix for ansible#1973. Signed-off-by: Luke Murphy <lukewm@riseup.net>
How about #1977 for now? |
decentral1se
added a commit
to decentral1se/molecule
that referenced
this issue
Apr 16, 2019
An interim fix for ansible#1973. Signed-off-by: Luke Murphy <lukewm@riseup.net>
decentral1se
added a commit
to decentral1se/molecule
that referenced
this issue
Apr 16, 2019
An interim fix for ansible#1973. Signed-off-by: Luke Murphy <lukewm@riseup.net>
webknjaz
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 16, 2019
An interim fix for #1973. Signed-off-by: Luke Murphy <lukewm@riseup.net>
gaborbernat
pushed a commit
to tox-dev/tox
that referenced
this issue
Apr 17, 2019
This enables users to have inline comments in deps lines in `tox.ini`. In particular, this allows having pyup bot integration. Ref: pyupio/dparse#34 Ref: ansible/molecule#1973 Fixes #1260
Good news! We'll be able to address this soon! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I'll need to check pyup docs on whether we could post that comment one line above or smth.
I've also filed a bug in tox: tox-dev/tox#1260
TODO:
oh.. this one seems wrong because it's parsed as a single line. we should turn it into a list
Originally posted by @webknjaz in #1958
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: