Skip to content

Conversation

@bbovenzi
Copy link
Contributor

excited-fuego


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added area:CLI area:dev-tools area:UI Related to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers. area:webserver Webserver related Issues labels Feb 18, 2025
@bugraoz93
Copy link
Contributor

🥁 🥁 🥁 🥁 🥁 🥁 🥁

@dimberman
Copy link
Contributor

Let us all make smores by the fire 🔥 🍫

@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ def get_link(
return url_for("RepairDatabricksTasks.repair", **query_params)


class RepairDatabricksTasks(AirflowBaseView, LoggingMixin):
class RepairDatabricksTasks(BaseView, LoggingMixin):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, should this extend the FAB AirflowBaseView, or be moved to a normal flask blueprint instead? Either way, some compat work with AF2 needs to be done here I think.

@jscheffl
Copy link
Contributor

74 kLoC deleted. WOW :-D

@jedcunningham
Copy link
Member

Just so we don't forget: #protm

@tirkarthi
Copy link
Contributor

Links to Airflow 2 UI should be updated . Opened #46902

@shahar1 shahar1 added the airflow3.0:breaking Candidates for Airflow 3.0 that contain breaking changes label Feb 20, 2025
@bbovenzi
Copy link
Contributor Author

PR moved over to #46942

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

airflow3.0:breaking Candidates for Airflow 3.0 that contain breaking changes area:CLI area:dev-tools area:UI Related to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers. area:webserver Webserver related Issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants