-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HBASE-26124 Backport HBASE-25373 "Remove HTrace completely in code base and try to make use of OpenTelemetry" to branch-2 #3529
Conversation
the original commit on master is 302d9ea |
…se and try to make use of OpenTelemetry" to branch-2 1/17 commits of HBASE-22120
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
The failed test TestSnapshotScannerHDFSAclController2 passed locally and the error of
|
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
@@ -76,9 +76,11 @@ | |||
<exclude>com.github.spotbugs:*</exclude> | |||
<exclude>org.apache.htrace:*</exclude> | |||
<exclude>org.apache.yetus:*</exclude> | |||
<exclude>org.apache.logging.log4j:*</exclude> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not from the original commit. Is this needed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you're right, I will remove them
@@ -225,9 +225,11 @@ | |||
<exclude>com.github.spotbugs:*</exclude> | |||
<exclude>org.apache.htrace:*</exclude> | |||
<exclude>org.apache.yetus:*</exclude> | |||
<exclude>org.apache.logging.log4j:*</exclude> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same here.
hbase-shaded/pom.xml
Outdated
@@ -156,9 +156,11 @@ | |||
<exclude>com.github.spotbugs:*</exclude> | |||
<exclude>org.apache.htrace:*</exclude> | |||
<exclude>org.apache.yetus:*</exclude> | |||
<exclude>org.apache.logging.log4j:*</exclude> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same here.
Change-Id: Ifd1f02c142748f15f417a780a485b45cd5a94397
Change-Id: Ifce333131217ced6807b407fe66d85093b06728d
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm after the javac, checkstyle and rubocop warnings are fixed.
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Change-Id: I2e1c41e50daaf353c5da8b0763677a69fe233de4
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Change-Id: I7b8b3df00465d7fc065cff7aa9b65d3878523a30
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
javac, checkstyle and rubocop have all been fixed, merging. |
Be lated +1. Thanks @taklwu for taking this work. This PR seems OK to merge to branch-2 directly, but I'm not sure if is better to backport to a branch-2 based feature branch first for the other issues? |
@Apache9 hey Duo, having your +1 is good and it's never late to comment!. (updated) let me clarify with you first, do you mean we should have a single feature branch for all remaining commits (about 14 commits remaining) , then have a single PR for reviewing all cherry-picks (with merge conflicts) such we can move the review faster ? (in fact I actually had backported all 17 commits in my local repository) or, do you have other concerns for "the other issues" (what does "other" means here)? |
This is a big new feature and until all the sub-tasks for HBASE-22120 are back port, the feature can be considered as 'complete'. So this means during the backporting, we have a partial implemented feature in one of our main branches, which is not good IMO. Thanks. |
cool, thanks @Apache9 Duo, I will open a feature branch HBASE-25853 based on branch-2 and and open up PRs with all remaining commits. |
… code base and try to make use of OpenTelemetry" to branch-2 (apache#3529)" This reverts commit f049301.
…se and try to make use of OpenTelemetry" to branch-2 (#3529) 1/17 commits of HBASE-22120 Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyi <psomogyi@apache.org>
…se and try to make use of OpenTelemetry" to branch-2 (#3529) 1/17 commits of HBASE-22120 Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyi <psomogyi@apache.org>
…se and try to make use of OpenTelemetry" to branch-2 (#3529) 1/17 commits of HBASE-22120 Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyi <psomogyi@apache.org>
…se and try to make use of OpenTelemetry" to branch-2 (apache#3529) 1/17 commits of HBASE-22120 Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyi <psomogyi@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit f049301) Ref: CDPD-32259 Reason: CVE / Security Notes: This is an directly backport from upstream f049301 instead of porting it from CDPD-26769 because branch-2.4 is mostly aligned with upstream branch-2. Change-Id: If50b88b45c2e1afc24a7924440651c7c68dc24e1
1/17 commits of HBASE-22120