examples: Upgrade to winit 0.25

[pingpongcat]

Current examples are based on old version of winint that was causing thread panic on my system, this is well know issue that was already fixed by winint team. I updated examples to use most up to date 0.25.0 version

[Ralith]

Thanks!

[MarijnS95]

Note that there have been quite a few attempts at fixing this before, see for example #356 and #481 and all the linked issues/PRs. The main problem is that they all try to refactor the entire example to clean up resources inside the event loop because fn run() doesn't return, leading to massive hard-to-review PRs that just get procrastinated.

This PR on the other hand takes the "smart" approach of using EventLoopExtRunReturn which is supported on every platform except iOS. At this point I'm inclined to just accept that and get rid of this issue for the majority of users, and hope someone (not me) will get around to reviewing and accepting the refactor to re-enable that platform once again.

[hYdos]

I'm able to open my PR again if you want to use #481

[MarijnS95]

@Ralith I noticed you don't seem to (usually?) squash merge requests - appreciated for my PRs which are generally multiple commits that all have their own purpose, though I create separate PRs for each of them now - but might have been desired for this PR otherwise I'd have squashed the whole loose bunch before force-pushing :D

EDIT: It also doesn't add the PR number to the final, squashed commit (since there is none 😅).

[Ralith]

Whoops, my bad! I had a roll going with all your PRs and didn't look closely enough here. I'm a big fan of the rebase/rewrite oriented workflow in general, since it optimizes for readability of the final product, which is what matters most.

[MarijnS95]

@Ralith I'm a little surprised since for me "squash and merge" is shown as default for this repository (and I don't recall that being a per user, per repository setting). We can probably disable the other options too now though.

[Ralith]

I think it's per-user per-repo, and I probably used it on some of my own PRs in the past.

[MarijnS95]

Looks it simply remembers the last merge method that was used, indeed. I don't have access to a settings page for this repo so there's no way for me to configure it.

[Ralith]

Something to hassle @MaikKlein about, I suppose. In the mean time I'll exercise extra caution.

[MaikKlein]

I don't have access to a settings page for this repo so there's no way for me to configure it.

I'll have a look.

Something to hassle @MaikKlein about, I suppose. In the mean time I'll exercise extra caution.

Personally I prefer squash and merge.