Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

jdk 9 compilation fails #165

Closed
sreev opened this issue May 19, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

jdk 9 compilation fails #165

sreev opened this issue May 19, 2018 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@sreev
Copy link

sreev commented May 19, 2018

[INFO] Compiling 25 source files to /Users/svaddi/SreeVaddi/source/github/sreev/bdg-formats/target/classes
[INFO] -------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR :
[INFO] -------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] Source option 1.5 is no longer supported. Use 1.6 or later.
[ERROR] Target option 1.5 is no longer supported. Use 1.6 or later.
[INFO] 2 errors
[INFO] -------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 4.232 s
[INFO] Finished at: 2018-05-19T07:42:19-07:00
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------

sreev pushed a commit to sreev/bdg-formats that referenced this issue May 19, 2018
@heuermh
Copy link
Member

heuermh commented May 21, 2018

Hello @sreev, thank you for submitting this issue!

Are you planning to use bdg-formats outside of Apache Spark? As far as I know, support for JDK 9/10 in Apache Spark is still some time off, and we won't bump downstream in ADAM until Spark does.

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

@heuermh agreed about not bumping to Java 9/10 until Spark does, but from looking at #166, it doesn't look like any of the changes would preclude us from still building against Java 8 (other than the explicit bump to Java 9, of course, but we could take all of the change except for that). If that's the case, then I'd suggest we merge so that the eventual move to Java 9/10 is easier.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants