Support other procedural filters

[ryanbr]

Coming from the post; https://www.reddit.com/r/brave_browser/comments/13lnfky/does_brave_now_fully_support_procedural_filtering/

https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Procedural-cosmetic-filters

Currently supporting :has

As of 19/05/2023, Popularity of filters in uBO:

Filter	Number of filters used
has-text	494
upward	352
xpath	49
matches-css	48
matches-path	7
matches-media	3
matches-attr	2
watch-attr	1

[laymonage]

Just noticed that Brave doesn't support has-text. Would be awesome to have that feature!

[superlex]

AdGuard lists use :contains() instead of :has-text(), Brave should support both of them.

[chris-fj]

Bumping this issue. It would be great to start supporting these selectors

[Yuki2718]

Any news on this? Facebook ads (video pages or on mobile) are unblocked by the lack of has-text().

[CapSel]

In the mean time one can use "Stylebot" to match and hide elements using CSS matching.

[chris-fj]

Thanks for the suggestion. However, I’m wondering what can StyleBot do that uBlock can’t, because having to install an extension kind of defeats the purpose of having a built-in adblocker. Specially for my use case, where I wanted to do the blocking on an iPhone on which I can’t install any extensions.

…

On Aug 23, 2024 at 11:38 PM, <CapSel ***@***.***)> wrote: In the mean time one can use "Stylebot" to match and hide elements using CSS matching. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub (#293 (comment)), or unsubscribe (https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQMROUBAKLOCZDMN7KN7ADZS6TTXAVCNFSM6AAAAAAYHTBWTCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMBXHA2DEOJUGI). You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[antonok-edm]

Added as of #388