Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: bump celestia-core #3654

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2024
Merged

chore: bump celestia-core #3654

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2024

Conversation

ninabarbakadze
Copy link
Member

Overview

Bump to the latest release of celestia-core

@ninabarbakadze ninabarbakadze requested a review from a team as a code owner July 3, 2024 08:25
@ninabarbakadze ninabarbakadze requested review from staheri14 and rach-id and removed request for a team July 3, 2024 08:25
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 3, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The go.mod file has been updated to reflect a version change in the github.com/tendermint/tendermint dependency from v1.37.0-tm-v0.34.29 to v1.38.0-tm-v0.34.29. This update indicates enhancements or bug fixes that may improve stability or add new features, ensuring the project benefits from the latest changes in the Tendermint library.

Changes

File Change Summary
go.mod Updated the github.com/tendermint/tendermint dependency from version v1.37.0-tm-v0.34.29 to v1.38.0-tm-v0.34.29

Tip

AI model upgrade

gpt-4o model for reviews and chat is now live

OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. Please join our Discord Community to provide any feedback or to report any issues.


Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4e460c0 and aac3592.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (1)
  • go.mod (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • go.mod

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@celestia-bot celestia-bot requested a review from a team July 3, 2024 08:25
@ninabarbakadze ninabarbakadze changed the title chore: bump celestia core chore: bump celestia-core Jul 3, 2024
@ninabarbakadze ninabarbakadze merged commit 97121d0 into main Jul 3, 2024
35 of 36 checks passed
@ninabarbakadze ninabarbakadze deleted the nina/bump-celestia-core branch July 3, 2024 08:55
@rootulp
Copy link
Collaborator

rootulp commented Jul 3, 2024

This only bumped celestia-core in one go.mod but our repo has 3 go.mods

rootulp added a commit to rootulp/celestia-app that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2024
rootulp added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2024
Follow up to #3654
<hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request #3659 done by
[Mergify](https://mergify.com).

Co-authored-by: Rootul P <rootulp@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants