-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider switching from cutadapt to pTrimmer #552
Labels
Milestone
Comments
The primer sequences to use for SARS-CoV-2 are in the artic project, and SRR11314339-SARS_S12 is a (poor) example of ARTIC/PrimalSeq data. (Since it was processed with Nextera XT it is likely that some read pairs will contain zero or one primer, rather than 2.) |
donkirkby
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 4, 2020
Clarification from slack discussion:
Check the documentation of adapter types. |
donkirkby
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
donkirkby
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 13, 2020
donkirkby
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 13, 2020
donkirkby
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 14, 2020
This was referenced May 14, 2020
Closed
donkirkby
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 15, 2020
Regenerate more microtest samples to handle primer trimming.
donkirkby
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 15, 2020
Time in minutes for cutadapt and other trimming steps:
|
donkirkby
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 26, 2020
donkirkby
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 27, 2020
donkirkby
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 27, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
With the changes for SARS-CoV-2 in #549, we may need to trim many more primer sequences. Look at pTrimmer and its paper to see if it's more efficient than cutadapt.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: