Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: coin selection with include_unsafe option should respect nCoinType #6442

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2024
Merged

fix: coin selection with include_unsafe option should respect nCoinType #6442

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

UdjinM6
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 commented Dec 2, 2024

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

The issue was introduced in #6074 via 69c5aa8

What was done?

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone (for repository code-owners and collaborators only)

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 added this to the 22 milestone Dec 2, 2024
PastaPastaPasta
PastaPastaPasta approved these changes Dec 3, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK e5114da

knst
knst approved these changes Dec 3, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@knst knst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM e5114da

thought, strange that it is not caught by functional tests

kwvg
kwvg approved these changes Dec 3, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@kwvg kwvg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK e5114da

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit 8d63c90 into dashpay:develop Dec 3, 2024
23 checks passed
PastaPastaPasta added a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
@PastaPastaPasta
Merge dashpay#6442: fix: coin selection with include_unsafe option …
cb04114 
…should respect `nCoinType`

e5114da fix: coin selection with `include_unsafe` option should respect `nCoinType` (UdjinM6)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  The issue was introduced in dashpay#6074 via dashpay@69c5aa8

  ## What was done?

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes

  ## Checklist:
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK e5114da
  kwvg:
    utACK e5114da

Tree-SHA512: 5d4e22f9d2cecf2239185e0f4c9d8b29b995b25b4f53a74d6c9b7929aac6ec918ebfb4029a83b72a003fe42fe82619f7ab4892d620bf5846cadf99f1f0cb0969
@PastaPastaPasta
Copy link
Member

back ported in #6447

PastaPastaPasta added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
@PastaPastaPasta
Merge #6447: [v22.0.x] backport: v22.0.0 rc.3
e0151e3 
c7b0d80 Merge #6441: fix: hold wallet shared pointer in CJ Manager/Sessions to prevent concurrent unload (pasta)
c074e09 Merge #6444: fix: add platform transfer to "most common" filter (pasta)
cb04114 Merge #6442: fix: coin selection with `include_unsafe` option should respect `nCoinType` (pasta)
db5b53a Merge #6434: fix: early EHF and buried EHF are indistinguish (pasta)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  See commits; backports for rc.3

  ## What was done?

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  built locally

  ## Breaking Changes

  ## Checklist:
    _Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  kwvg:
    ACK c7b0d80
  UdjinM6:
    utACK c7b0d80

Tree-SHA512: a64d6503a845ea86df8660d34cdf819c6fefcae5e82035bd8de40152f4f7d894cd1870315b791cca81e6d4db08d9929e4d1de3338a0338478072c9e6bb66952a
PastaPastaPasta added a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2024
@PastaPastaPasta
Merge dashpay#6484: chore: Merge master 22.0.0 back into develop
779e429 
1c7bfcb chore: set release true (pasta)
c90339e Merge dashpay#6459: docs: add release notes for v22.0.0 (pasta)
a6f1fc5 Merge dashpay#6475: chore: bumped chain assumed sizes based on latest usage (pasta)
d7cd9f1 Merge dashpay#6464: chore: update man pages for v22 (pasta)
212f91c Merge dashpay#6461: docs: update supported versions in SECURITY.md (pasta)
9a8b685 Merge dashpay#6460: chore: Translations 2024-12 (pasta)
2f71f4d Merge dashpay#6458: chore: bump MIN_MASTERNODE_PROTO_VERSION to latest proto (pasta)
fa29ed5 Merge dashpay#6456: fix(qt): allow refreshing wallet data without crashing (pasta)
758cd64 Merge dashpay#6452: fix: store ready queues on the mixing masternode (pasta)
395447b Merge dashpay#6451: depends: update 'src/dashbls' to dashpay/bls-signatures@7e747e8a as 62fa665 (pasta)
c7b0d80 Merge dashpay#6441: fix: hold wallet shared pointer in CJ Manager/Sessions to prevent concurrent unload (pasta)
c074e09 Merge dashpay#6444: fix: add platform transfer to "most common" filter (pasta)
cb04114 Merge dashpay#6442: fix: coin selection with `include_unsafe` option should respect `nCoinType` (pasta)
db5b53a Merge dashpay#6434: fix: early EHF and buried EHF are indistinguish (pasta)
8b88ff7 Merge dashpay#6414: chore: bump seeds for v22 (pasta)
02ad523 Merge dashpay#6411: chore: update nMinimumChainWork, defaultAssumeValid, checkpointData, chainTxData for mainnet and testnet (pasta)
3bbcd3d Merge dashpay#6393: docs: mention building for some HOSTs only in `release-process.md` (pasta)
18f636f Merge dashpay#6426: fix: respect SENDDSQUEUE message, move DSQ relay into net processing / peerman (pasta)
9fed456 Merge dashpay#6407: fix: dataraces (pasta)
86105da Merge dashpay#6408: refactor: removed pre-MN_RR logic of validation of CL (pasta)
a1f7e96 Merge dashpay#6406: ci: use `actions/cache` to manage depends cache (pasta)
90a3807 Merge dashpay#6402: ci: cache built (pasta)
66f6787 Merge dashpay#6401: ci: deduplicate depends building (pasta)
7ca5663 Merge dashpay#6397: ci: add powerpc64 to GH Guix job matrix (pasta)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented

  ## What was done?
  Suppressed changes from 1c7bfcb and resolved merge conflicts.

  ```
  Auto-merging .github/workflows/build.yml
  Auto-merging configure.ac
  Auto-merging src/chainparams.cpp
  Auto-merging src/coinjoin/client.cpp
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/client.cpp
  Auto-merging src/coinjoin/client.h
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/client.h
  Auto-merging src/coinjoin/util.cpp
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/util.cpp
  Auto-merging src/coinjoin/util.h
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/util.h
  Auto-merging src/evo/specialtxman.cpp
  Auto-merging src/init.cpp
  Auto-merging src/net_processing.cpp
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/net_processing.cpp
  Auto-merging src/net_processing.h
  Auto-merging src/qt/transactiontablemodel.cpp
  Auto-merging src/wallet/wallet.cpp
  Auto-merging src/wallet/wallet.h
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/wallet/wallet.h
  Auto-merging test/functional/feature_llmq_chainlocks.py
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in test/functional/feature_llmq_chainlocks.py
  ```

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes

  ## Checklist:
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK d108579; no diff to develop

Tree-SHA512: 3f063011224880fee35edb04ce265dff33a52273c3d45ef1dbcebcecb22c25d8ad7c91b83514f36142716a6fbd0ddd3a8a3f2a9b59ce78ce975bbce69a2a13b5
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@kwvg kwvg kwvg approved these changes

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta approved these changes

@knst knst knst approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
22
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@UdjinM6 @PastaPastaPasta @knst @kwvg