Skip to content

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky
Copy link
Member

These were all enabled in #123112

@dotnet-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @dotnet/ilc-contrib
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@MichalStrehovsky
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run runtime-nativeaot-outerloop

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates existing test coverage and infrastructure helpers to account for NativeAOT outerloop execution differences, primarily by skipping/guarding specific tests that currently fail under NativeAOT.

Changes:

  • Added ActiveIssue-based skips for specific JIT outerloop tests under NativeAOT (and NativeAOT+32-bit).
  • Guarded failing UTF8 StringBuilder marshalling sub-tests when running under NativeAOT.
  • Added TestLibrary.Utilities.Is32 helper for 32-bit process detection used by conditional test attributes.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File Description
src/tests/JIT/Regression/CLR-x86-JIT/V2.0-Beta2/b399444/Repro.cs Skips the test for NativeAOT via ActiveIssue.
src/tests/JIT/Methodical/jitinterface/bug603649.cs Skips the test for NativeAOT 32-bit via ActiveIssue + new Is32 helper.
src/tests/Interop/StringMarshalling/UTF8/UTF8Test.cs Disables known-failing StringBuilder marshalling checks under NativeAOT (linked issue).
src/tests/Common/CoreCLRTestLibrary/Utilities.cs Adds Is32 helper to support conditional skipping logic.

@MichalStrehovsky
Copy link
Member Author

/ba-g arm64 infra seems to be overloaded

@MichalStrehovsky MichalStrehovsky merged commit c8aca8b into dotnet:main Jan 29, 2026
103 of 111 checks passed
@MichalStrehovsky MichalStrehovsky deleted the outrloop branch January 29, 2026 05:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants