Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix "substract" typo #16431

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Spencer-Comin
Copy link
Contributor

@Spencer-Comin Spencer-Comin commented Dec 7, 2022

substract -> subtract
depends on eclipse/omr#6840

@0xdaryl
Copy link
Contributor

0xdaryl commented May 4, 2023

The OMR Acceptance build is not healthy at the moment. I won't launch testing here until that is fixed, as a coordinated merge requires a clean set of tests (or at least I don't want to merge unless that is the case).

@pshipton
Copy link
Member

pshipton commented May 4, 2023

Once eclipse/omr#6977 is merged we should be good.

@0xdaryl
Copy link
Contributor

0xdaryl commented May 4, 2023

Jenkins test sanity.functional,sanity.openjdk all jdk8,jdk11,jdk17,jdk20 depends eclipse/omr#6840

@0xdaryl
Copy link
Contributor

0xdaryl commented May 5, 2023

There are a number of failures from the mock acceptance build above. I would have only expected this PR to cause build problems, not functional issues, so I doubt these are related to this PR. Nevertheless, I'd like to see these tests cleaner than this. Can you rebase both the OMR and OpenJ9 PRs since the known problem in the acceptance build was reverted yesterday, and I will relaunch the tests? If problems persist after that I'll ask you to investigate. Thanks.

@0xdaryl
Copy link
Contributor

0xdaryl commented May 5, 2023

Jenkins test sanity.functional,sanity.openjdk all jdk8,jdk11,jdk17,jdk20 depends eclipse/omr#6840

@0xdaryl
Copy link
Contributor

0xdaryl commented May 6, 2023

Jenkins test sanity.functional xlinux jdk17,jdk20

@0xdaryl
Copy link
Contributor

0xdaryl commented May 6, 2023

Jenkins test sanity.functional,sanity.openjdk xmac jdk20

@0xdaryl
Copy link
Contributor

0xdaryl commented May 6, 2023

Jenkins test sanity.functional,sanity.openjdk aix jdk11

@0xdaryl
Copy link
Contributor

0xdaryl commented May 7, 2023

Jenkins test sanity.openjdk xmac jdk11 depends eclipse/omr#6840

@0xdaryl
Copy link
Contributor

0xdaryl commented May 7, 2023

Jenkins test sanity.openjdk zlinux jdk20 depends eclipse/omr#6840

@0xdaryl
Copy link
Contributor

0xdaryl commented May 23, 2023

Just FYI that I won't re-launch the testing above until the OMR acceptance build is clean (it has been unhealthy for over a week now).

@Spencer-Comin
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll rebase this and the OMR PR again once the OMR acceptance build is healthy, and hopefully every goes smoothly from there.

@0xdaryl
Copy link
Contributor

0xdaryl commented Jun 2, 2023

Acceptance build is reasonably stable. May as well rebase this and the OMR PR and we can try again.

@0xdaryl
Copy link
Contributor

0xdaryl commented Jun 2, 2023

Jenkins test sanity.functional,sanity.openjdk all jdk8,jdk11,jdk17,jdk20 depends eclipse/omr#6840

1 similar comment
@0xdaryl
Copy link
Contributor

0xdaryl commented Jun 6, 2023

Jenkins test sanity.functional,sanity.openjdk all jdk8,jdk11,jdk17,jdk20 depends eclipse/omr#6840

@r30shah
Copy link
Contributor

r30shah commented Nov 17, 2023

@Spencer-Comin Can you rebase this branch as well just for sanity?

Signed-off-by: Spencer Comin <spencer.comin@ibm.com>
@Spencer-Comin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Added remaining instances of "substract" that I found through the codebase

@r30shah
Copy link
Contributor

r30shah commented Mar 12, 2024

I assume this depends on eclipse/omr#6840 , right ?

@Spencer-Comin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@r30shah yes, I've updated the description to say that

@r30shah
Copy link
Contributor

r30shah commented Mar 13, 2024

Jenkins test sanity.functional,sanity.openjdk all jdk8,jdk11,jdk17 depends eclipse/omr#6840

@r30shah
Copy link
Contributor

r30shah commented Mar 15, 2024

@Spencer-Comin Can you verify the JDK11 s390 failure are not related to these changes ?

@Spencer-Comin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@r30shah The JDK11 failure looks like an instance of #14948

@r30shah
Copy link
Contributor

r30shah commented Mar 15, 2024

Jenkins test sanity.openjdk zlinux jdk11 depends eclipse/omr#6840

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants