-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 165
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extension operation disappears for some queries in rdf4j v4 #4066
Comments
abrokenjester
added
🐞 bug
issue is a bug
📦 sparql
affects the SPARQL parser / engine
labels
Jul 17, 2022
I'm going to partially revert some of the changes made for GH-2990, and consistently use an extension again. This seems to be more in line with the intent of the SPARQL spec (see https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#sparqlSelectExpressions in particular). |
abrokenjester
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 20, 2022
5 tasks
abrokenjester
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 20, 2022
abrokenjester
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 20, 2022
This makes it clearer why this mechanism exists in addition to Extension elements.
abrokenjester
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 20, 2022
This makes it clearer why this mechanism exists in addition to Extension elements.
abrokenjester
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 21, 2022
This makes it clearer why this mechanism exists in addition to Extension elements.
abrokenjester
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 21, 2022
This makes it clearer why this mechanism exists in addition to Extension elements.
abrokenjester
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 21, 2022
This makes it clearer why this mechanism exists in addition to Extension elements.
abrokenjester
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 21, 2022
This makes it clearer why this mechanism exists in addition to Extension elements.
abrokenjester
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 21, 2022
This makes it clearer why this mechanism exists in addition to Extension elements.
abrokenjester
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 21, 2022
This makes it clearer why this mechanism exists in addition to Extension elements.
abrokenjester
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 21, 2022
This makes it clearer why this mechanism exists in addition to Extension elements.
abrokenjester
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 21, 2022
This makes it clearer why this mechanism exists in addition to Extension elements.
abrokenjester
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 27, 2022
abrokenjester
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 27, 2022
This makes it clearer why this mechanism exists in addition to Extension elements.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Discussed in #3991
Originally posted by apano-on June 15, 2022
It seems like the operation with the extension has disappeared in at least one scenario for rdf4j v4.0.0 (as well as v4.0.2). Is there a rationale for this change?
Steps to reproduce
The following query is translated differently in the new version of rdf4j
Current Behavior (rdf4j v4.0.2 translation/algebra tree)
Expected Behavior (rdf4j v3 translation/algebra tree)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: