Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Security Solution][Detections][Threshold Rules] Threshold Rule Bug Fixes #84918

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Dec 20, 2020

Conversation

madirey
Copy link
Contributor

@madirey madirey commented Dec 3, 2020

Summary

Addresses:

Checklist

For maintainers

@madirey madirey requested review from a team as code owners December 3, 2020 16:00
@madirey madirey marked this pull request as draft December 3, 2020 16:04
Copy link
Contributor

@cjcenizal cjcenizal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only ES UI change was a fixed typo in a comment in the form lib. LGTM!

@spong spong added the Feature:Threshold Rule Security Solution Threshold Rule feature label Dec 4, 2020
@madirey madirey changed the title [Security Solution][Detections] Threshold Rule Bug Fixes [Security Solution][Detections][Threshold Rules] Threshold Rule Bug Fixes Dec 6, 2020
@peluja1012 peluja1012 added the Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc. label Dec 8, 2020
@madirey madirey marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2020 00:30
Copy link
Contributor

@marshallmain marshallmain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good except one small bug that could affect API users

} as unknown) as Filter);
const esFilter = await getFilter({
type,
filters: filters?.concat(bucketFilters),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

filters?.concat(bucketFilters) returns undefined if filters is undefined. Looks like filters ? filters.concat(bucketFilters) : bucketFilters would give the intended result? filters defaults to [] if not provided in the UI but it's optional in the API so it could be undefined here.

Suggested change
filters: filters?.concat(bucketFilters),
filters: filters ? filters.concat(bucketFilters) : bucketFilters,

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

Metrics [docs]

Async chunks

Total size of all lazy-loaded chunks that will be downloaded as the user navigates the app

id before after diff
securitySolution 8.5MB 8.5MB +564.0B

Distributable file count

id before after diff
default 47141 47902 +761

History

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

@madirey madirey merged commit 0d9b40d into elastic:master Dec 20, 2020
@madirey madirey deleted the threshold-fields branch December 20, 2020 19:10
madirey added a commit to madirey/kibana that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2020
…ixes (elastic#84918)

* Move threshold dupe detection logic to its own function

* Minor fixup

* Refactor and remove property injection for threshold signals

* Only show aggregatable fields for threshold rule grouping

* Add threshold rule kql filter to timeline

* Remove outdated getThresholdSignalQueryFields tests

* Filter aggregatable fields on client

* Revert "Only show aggregatable fields for threshold rule grouping"

This reverts commit 539fa49.

* Fix bug with incorrect calculation of threshold signal dupes when no threshold field present

* Revert "Add threshold rule kql filter to timeline"

This reverts commit 6482374.

* Add test skeleton

* Finish tests

* Address comment
madirey added a commit to madirey/kibana that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2020
…ixes (elastic#84918)

* Move threshold dupe detection logic to its own function

* Minor fixup

* Refactor and remove property injection for threshold signals

* Only show aggregatable fields for threshold rule grouping

* Add threshold rule kql filter to timeline

* Remove outdated getThresholdSignalQueryFields tests

* Filter aggregatable fields on client

* Revert "Only show aggregatable fields for threshold rule grouping"

This reverts commit 539fa49.

* Fix bug with incorrect calculation of threshold signal dupes when no threshold field present

* Revert "Add threshold rule kql filter to timeline"

This reverts commit 6482374.

* Add test skeleton

* Finish tests

* Address comment
gmmorris added a commit to gmmorris/kibana that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2020
* master: (48 commits)
  Fix request with disabled aggregation (elastic#85696)
  [Security Solution][Detections][Threshold Rules] Threshold Rule Bug Fixes (elastic#84918)
  Removed a possibility to define two different names for Alert types on API and UI level. (elastic#86236)
  Bump Node.js from version 14.15.2 to 14.15.3 (elastic#86593)
  [index patterns] Fleep app - Keep saved object field list until field caps provides fields (elastic#85370)
  [Security Solutions] fix timeline tabs + layout (elastic#86581)
  Upgrade to hapi version 20 (elastic#85406)
  App Services: Remove remaining uiActions, expressions, data, embeddable circular dependencies. (elastic#82791)
  Rename chartLibrary setting to legacyChartsLibrary (elastic#86529)
  [CI] TeamCity updates (elastic#85843)
  [Maps] Use Json for mvt-tests (elastic#86492)
  [Rollup Jobs] Added autofocus to cron editor (elastic#86324)
  [Monitoring][Alerting] CCR read exceptions alert (elastic#85908)
  [CI] Bump memory for main CI workers (elastic#86541)
  Explicitly set Elasticsearch heap size during CI and local development (elastic#86513)
  [App Search] Updates to results on the documents view (elastic#86181)
  [Discover] Change default sort handling  (elastic#85561)
  [App Search] Convert DocumentCreationModal to DocumentCreationFlyout (elastic#86508)
  [App Search] Sample Engines should have access to the Crawler (elastic#86502)
  Fixed duplication of create new modal (elastic#86489)
  ...
madirey added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2020
…ixes (#84918) (#86606)

* Move threshold dupe detection logic to its own function

* Minor fixup

* Refactor and remove property injection for threshold signals

* Only show aggregatable fields for threshold rule grouping

* Add threshold rule kql filter to timeline

* Remove outdated getThresholdSignalQueryFields tests

* Filter aggregatable fields on client

* Revert "Only show aggregatable fields for threshold rule grouping"

This reverts commit 539fa49.

* Fix bug with incorrect calculation of threshold signal dupes when no threshold field present

* Revert "Add threshold rule kql filter to timeline"

This reverts commit 6482374.

* Add test skeleton

* Finish tests

* Address comment

Co-authored-by: Kibana Machine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
yctercero pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2020
…ixes (#84918) (#86607)

* Move threshold dupe detection logic to its own function

* Minor fixup

* Refactor and remove property injection for threshold signals

* Only show aggregatable fields for threshold rule grouping

* Add threshold rule kql filter to timeline

* Remove outdated getThresholdSignalQueryFields tests

* Filter aggregatable fields on client

* Revert "Only show aggregatable fields for threshold rule grouping"

This reverts commit 539fa49.

* Fix bug with incorrect calculation of threshold signal dupes when no threshold field present

* Revert "Add threshold rule kql filter to timeline"

This reverts commit 6482374.

* Add test skeleton

* Finish tests

* Address comment
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature:Threshold Rule Security Solution Threshold Rule feature release_note:enhancement Team:Detections and Resp Security Detection Response Team Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc. v7.11.0 v8.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants