Skip to content

[ML] Upgrade to PyTorch 2.5.0 on Windows 2022 builds #2783

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Nov 29, 2024

Conversation

edsavage
Copy link
Contributor

@edsavage edsavage commented Nov 20, 2024

Update build scripts and docs to refer to PyTorch 2.5.0

Depends on #2780

@edsavage edsavage changed the title [ML] Upgrade to PYTORCH 2.5.0 on Windows 2022 builds [ML] Upgrade to PyTorch 2.5.0 on Windows 2022 builds Nov 20, 2024
@edsavage edsavage marked this pull request as ready for review November 27, 2024 23:34
Copy link
Contributor

@valeriy42 valeriy42 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link

@edsavage edsavage merged commit 2bbdff4 into elastic:main Nov 29, 2024
8 of 16 checks passed
edsavage added a commit to edsavage/ml-cpp that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
Update build scripts and docs to refer to PyTorch 2.5.0

* Uses latest Windows 2022 VM image (family/ml-cpp-3-windows-2022)
valeriy42 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2024
…2790)

Update build scripts and docs to refer to PyTorch 2.5.0

Note the slightly different procedure between the Windows 2022 and 2016 builds.

Backports #2783
edsavage added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2024
Update Windows build scripts, documentation etc. to refer to Boost 1.86.

Backports #2780

Depends on #2783
@edsavage edsavage deleted the windows_2022_pytorch_25 branch March 20, 2025 03:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants