Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Find a way to store the best physical (i.e. unnormalised) model #2

Conversation

gomezzz
Copy link
Collaborator

@gomezzz gomezzz commented Aug 5, 2021

Merge #1 first.

  • Only saving model if not renormalized
  • Added some logging

Validated it in debug

image

gomezzz and others added 15 commits August 3, 2021 11:58
- Added some trcwa stuff and constants
Co-authored-by: Håvard Hem Toftevaag <70584234+htoftevaag@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Håvard Hem Toftevaag <70584234+htoftevaag@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Håvard Hem Toftevaag <70584234+htoftevaag@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Håvard Hem Toftevaag <70584234+htoftevaag@users.noreply.github.com>
- Added test for trcwa
- Added some logging and asserts
- Renamed constants due to import behavior
- Some minor fixes
- Finalized backend removal from trcwa
- Cleaned up import mess
- Added test for frequency conversion
- Training NB WIP
- Started adding a function to validate cfgs
- Reworked plots to work with models
- Added missign cfg params and checks for them
- Made sigmoid def
- Small fixes
- Relocated validate config
Copy link
Collaborator

@htoftevaag htoftevaag left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some Pablo Typóz

nidn/training/losses/spectrum_loss.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
nidn/training/losses/spectrum_loss.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Håvard Hem Toftevaag <70584234+htoftevaag@users.noreply.github.com>
@gomezzz gomezzz requested a review from htoftevaag August 5, 2021 12:56
@htoftevaag htoftevaag merged commit 9855d14 into main Aug 5, 2021
@htoftevaag htoftevaag deleted the Find-a-way-to-store-the-best-physical-(i.e.-unnormalised)-model branch August 5, 2021 15:37
gomezzz added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants