-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix incorrect unmounted state update warning #18617
Merged
bvaughn
merged 3 commits into
facebook:master
from
bvaughn:fix-unmounted-state-update-warning
Apr 18, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: Can you pass
current
as an argument throughschedulePassiveEffects
? We try to limit the number of places we access the.alternate
pointer, since one day we're hoping to remove i t.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could do that for
schedulePassiveEffects()
becausecommitLifeCycles()
already has both fibers.But we also call
enqueuePendingPassiveHookEffectUnmount()
fromcommitUnmount()
which is called fromcommitNestedUnmounts()
which traces all the through tocommitMutationEffects()
, so I'm still going to have to accessalternate
there (and add a bunch of additional params to the functions in between).Is this still the right change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like what we're calling "current" is inconsistent between
commitWork
andcommitDeletion
calls.For e.g.
commitWork
we passnextEffect.alternate
ascurrent
:react/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberWorkLoop.new.js
Lines 2192 to 2193 in cfefc81
But for
commitDeletion
we passnextEffect
ascurrent
:react/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberWorkLoop.new.js
Line 2214 in cfefc81
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We also call
commitNestedUnmounts
andcommitUnmount
fromunmountHostComponents
while traversing the tree, so we'd need to add a bunch of additionalalternate
access here to pass through the added param.Since this was a "nit" and given the above considerations, I think I'm not going to make any additional change to the alternate stuff for now. Seems like it would be a net loss. We can always follow up with another PR if someone disagrees strongly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right I guess “current” isn’t accurate, it’s just the “other fiber”
Yeah that makes sense. If we got rid of alternates, each fiber would have a shared instance object and we could put the flag on that.