Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 16, 2023. It is now read-only.

Undeprecates gafferpy #983

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2022
Merged

Undeprecates gafferpy #983

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2022

Conversation

t92549
Copy link
Contributor

@t92549 t92549 commented Mar 14, 2022

This reverts commit 94a4d38.

Related Issue

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 15, 2022

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (develop@684a765). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             develop     #983   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage           ?   50.34%           
  Complexity         ?      125           
==========================================
  Files              ?       42           
  Lines              ?     1601           
  Branches           ?      130           
==========================================
  Hits               ?      806           
  Misses             ?      741           
  Partials           ?       54           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 684a765...560e6db. Read the comment docs.

# Deprecated
# README

Copyright 2016 Crown Copyright
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the plan not to update the header as we're only reinstating things not strictly changing?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes this PR is strictly a git revert, but you're right that date does need changing. I also don't like the fact the readme starts with a license when there is a separate license file.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It feels like we need to rework the way the license stuff is managed more generally. Do these kind of files really need a header? For example, we don't have a header on every page of the docs.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I am not sure, seems unnecessary and makes it harder to read for a readme.

@t92549 t92549 merged commit 4e359ea into develop Mar 25, 2022
@t92549 t92549 deleted the gh-982-undeprecate-gafferpy branch March 25, 2022 10:35
t92549 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 12, 2023
* Revert "gh-951: Add deprecation note to readme (#952)" (#983)

This reverts commit 94a4d38.

* gh-984: Change usage of log4j to slf4j (#985)

* gh-984: Change usage of log4j to slf4j

* gh-984: Checkstyle

* Updated Gaffer version to 1.22.0 (#990)

* Updated Gaffer version to 1.22.0

* Gh-986: Migrate log4j to reload4j (#992)

* gh-984: Change usage of log4j to slf4j

* gh-984: Checkstyle

* Exclude Log4j dependencies

Co-authored-by: t92549 <80890692+t92549@users.noreply.github.com>

* gh-975: Fix gafferpy alpha 1 (#994)

Co-authored-by: Gaffer <github-actions@github.com>
Co-authored-by: GCHQDeveloper314 <94527357+GCHQDeveloper314@users.noreply.github.com>

* prepare release gaffer-tools-1.22.0

* prepare for next development iteration

* Update links to point to v1docs (#999)

* Graph layout is now saved when navigate away from page (#812)

* Graph layout is now saved when navigate away from page

* Fixed issue with old graph results still showing after clear

* Updating removed elements to use concat

* Updating to use forEach

Updating removePreviouslyRemovedElements to use forEach

* Updated syntax error

* Altered foreach syntax due to jasmine errors

* gh-496: Fix bug with concat

Co-authored-by: t11947 <53758970+t11947@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: t92549 <80890692+t92549@users.noreply.github.com>

* Add Deprecation message to UI README (#1061)

* Updated Gaffer version to 1.23.0 (#1064)

* Updated Gaffer version to 1.23.0

* CommonConstants replaced

* Fixed js deps

* Fixed js deps again

* Original package.json

---------

Co-authored-by: Gaffer <github-actions@github.com>

* prepare release gaffer-tools-1.23.0

* prepare for next development iteration

---------

Co-authored-by: Gaffer <github-actions@github.com>
Co-authored-by: GCHQDeveloper314 <94527357+GCHQDeveloper314@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: p013570 <p013570@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: t11947 <53758970+t11947@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove gafferpy deprecation notice
4 participants