-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
all: reopen tree for Go 1.24 development #67586
Comments
When you post tree reopening issues like this one, could you please include when you expect it to happen? Given https://go.dev/wiki/Go-Release-Cycle, I would expect mid July, but that might not be obvious to everyone. |
@mvdan That sounds perfectly reasonable. Thanks for suggesting it. |
We've reached the time to reopen. I'll be starting on this soon. So far it seems there aren't any large changes that need special treatment; please comment if we missed something that should land early in a specific order to reduce merge conflicts. |
Is fix for 1.23 needs to be backport? For example, CL https://go.dev/cl/599675 is land after rc2, but it's for 1.23 release. |
@cuonglm We'll soon merge everything on the main branch, up to but not including the upcoming "internal/goversion: update Version to 1.24" CL, to release-branch.go1.23. Since CL 599675 is already submitted, no need for action on your side. But in the near future after the goversion CL lands, if something is intended for 1.23 and permitted by freeze policy it will indeed need to be cherry-picked to release-branch.go1.23 individually. See https://go.dev/s/release#july--january-week-3-work-on-the-next-release-begins for details. |
Change https://go.dev/cl/600176 mentions this issue: |
Change https://go.dev/cl/600177 mentions this issue: |
Go 1.24 is in the process of being opened for development (to be eventually released). This change marks the very beginning of its development cycle, updating the Version value accordingly. For #40705. For #67586. Change-Id: Ibd194f229e7dbd25bc2713f86330fab50ea1dfaa Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/600176 LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com> Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com> Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Following the "For the release team" steps in README: cd doc cp -R initial/ next $EDITOR next/1-intro.md Dropped '*' from the cp -R command to avoid needing to create an empty next directory with a separate command. For #68545. For #67586. Change-Id: I25215bc35a043e0f26d4a86ffe66eb3c26348fef Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/600177 Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com> LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com> Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
There were about |
@dmitshur CL https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/560955 could be land in for early in cycle, too. |
The tree is now open. See announcement on golang-dev. Thanks. (I'll unpin this issue after some time passes.) |
At what point will we change the go.mod version line to 1.24? Not sure if this falls into the realm of this issue, or if it is being tracked elsewhere. Thanks. |
Current Tree Status: Tree is open for Go 1.24 development (golang-dev announcement)
This is a tracking issue for the upcoming task of reopening the tree for Go 1.24 development. (It's created a little early to create room for planning early CLs/branches to land during tree reopening.) The estimated date for the tree reopening is mid July 2024.
As usual, the tree will initially be open to changes that must land early:
internal/goversion.Version
to 24—this should be the very first CL to be submitted as it marks the start ofmaster
branch representing Go 1.24 (rather than Go 1.23). (Example CL.)doc/next
for the Go 1.24 cycle. (See "For the release team" in doc/README.)early-in-cycle
(query).CC @golang/release.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: