Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add fused GEMM + SiLU kernel #180

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

harsh-nod
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

harsh-nod and others added 12 commits September 23, 2024 20:13
…g#161)

This PR modifies the insertion point for iter args to ensure that the
iter args are in the same order as the init args and outputs. This
simplifies the mapping between init args, iter args and outputs.

Signed-off-by: Harsh Menon <harsh@nod-labs.com>
Fixes iree-org#85

PR based on the work of @maxbartel 

Requires changes in torch-mlir:
[llvm/torch-mlir/#3688](llvm/torch-mlir#3688)

Adds the mutable modifier to a global buffer and lifts said buffer to a
global if there is a store-producer node associated with it.

Signed-off-by: Christopher McGirr <mcgirr@roofline.ai>
Co-authored-by: Maximilian Bartel <bartel@roofline.ai>
…iree-org#162)

This PR introduces changes to handle elementwise or general arithmetic
operations after we did some tiled-loop-reduction ("Reduction")
operation.

The main problem with the current stack is indexing_dims information for
Reduction relies on the user. This would work if it's user/consumer is
tkw.write, but in other cases such as BinaryPyOp or UnaryPyOp, it will
lack such information.

To make matters worst BinaryPyOp/UnaryPyOp depends on it's src/producer
for indexing dim, while Reduction op depends on it's dst/consumer for
its' indexing dim information. This would ended up causing infinite loop
between UnaryPyOp/BinaryPyOp <-> Reduction.

This PR fixes the indexing dimension logic Reduction and GetResult
(required for expanded Reduction) to be based on it's reduction axis(for
Reduction) and it's source/consumer information.

---------

Signed-off-by: Stanley Winata <stanley.winata@amd.com>
This PR removes the need for propagating indices using
post expansion. The new approach propagates the MMA
indices to the MMA dimensions of all tensors (rather
than just MMA nodes) and then specializes them depending
on whether they lie within the backward slices of the
LHS and RHS or forward slices of the ACC.

---------

Signed-off-by: Harsh Menon <harsh@nod-labs.com>
This PR adds more documentation about tkw. Specifically, it provides a
first draft of the introduction and adds a section on memory access
patterns.

Signed-off-by: Harsh Menon <harsh@nod-labs.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Butygin <ivan.butygin@gmail.com>
…g#166)

The main motivation behind this PR is to enable multiple induction
variable/iterArg on the same tiled "Reduction" loop. To enable above we
did a couple things:

1. Enable lowering/expansion on `operator.getitem` (the op that extract
multiple results in python i.e `res0, res1 = fn`) by templating it
on`GetResult(CustomOp)` since they have the same args and interface and
can reuse most of the indexing/expansion helper.

2. Introduce `res_idx`, a variable to represent which result index of an
op we are referring to, during expansion and context map. This is useful
for ops that has more than one results / variables as outputs.

3. bug fix in expand_reduction, where we hoist out iterating and
expanding of `reduction.init_args` out of the loop that iterates and
expands over the `yield`/`return_val` of the reduction loop. It is
expected that the size of `init_args` is the same as size of
`yield`/`return_val`. Hence if we had N iter_args/yields, we ended up
expanding the `init_args` N x N time instead of N times. We haven't seen
it thus far because we have been only playing with 1 init_arg/iterArg,
and 1x1 == 1.

4. Introduce a canonicalization pattern to fold chains of GetResult.
this is because GetResult by semantic/design is only expected to extract
and have one result. Hence a chain of GetResult should just be replaced
by itself. This help clean up the IR.

num.4 also helps circumvent issue where Reduction and GetResult is
expanded completely by itself not following the DFS structure per
dimension like the rest of the expansion code. This becomes especially
problematic for multiple IterArg since Getitem is not expecting its'
source value to be expanded without it.

---------

Signed-off-by: Stanley Winata <stanley.winata@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Boian Petkantchin <boian.petkantchin@amd.com>
Instead of generating individual element comparisons and doing
`vector.insertelement` generate the whole mask using vector ops.

Add support for vector codegen when generating MLIR IR from sympy
expressions. Add method `IndexingContext.iota` to generate special
symbols which map to `(1,2 ... n-1)` vec expressions. `gen_sympy_index`
will start to generate vector ops when encountering such symbols,
inserting proper `splat`'s between scalar vals when necessary.

---------

Signed-off-by: Ivan Butygin <ivan.butygin@gmail.com>
…#179)

* Adds an option to `aot.export(import_symbolic_shape_expressions=True)`
to enable emission of torch-mlir symbolic shape constraints. This is
currently set to False until IREE is ready to ingest these by default.

Rough sequence of work in IREE proper:

* Custom lowering of `torch.symbolic_int` and
`torch.bind_symbolic_shape` ops to IREE util "assume" ops. Note that we
are only planning to lower "terminal" bindings (basically function
arguments and a couple of other such categories).
* Canonicalizations to ensure that assume equalities are == 0 (versus
the native form from torch where they assume a non zero equality).
* Fusion will clone corresponding bindings on dependent dims into
dispatch regions.
* Existing linalg shape analysis extended and queryable by codegen.

---------

Signed-off-by: Stella Laurenzo <stellaraccident@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Menon <harsh@nod-labs.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants