-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bpftool: bpf skeletons assert type sizes #70
Conversation
Master branch: a19df71 |
Master branch: 08894d9 |
dbc3c49
to
1f3e902
Compare
When emitting type declarations in skeletons, bpftool will now also emit static assertions on the size of the data/bss/rodata/etc fields. This ensures that in situations where userspace and kernel types have the same name but differ in size we do not silently produce incorrect results but instead break the build. This was reported in [1] and as expected the repro in [2] fails to build on the new size assert after this change. [1]: Closes: libbpf/libbpf#433 [2]: https://github.com/fuweid/iovisor-bcc-pr-3777 Signed-off-by: Delyan Kratunov <delyank@fb.com> Acked-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Tested-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Master branch: c561d11 |
1f3e902
to
f3dab57
Compare
Master branch: 08d4dba Pull request is NOT updated. Failed to apply https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=617326
conflict:
|
At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=617326 irrelevant now. Closing PR. |
The srv_mutex is used during writeback so cifs should ensure that allocations done when that mutex is held are done with GFP_NOFS, to avoid having direct reclaim ending up waiting for the same mutex and causing a deadlock. This is detected by lockdep with the splat below: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.18.0 #70 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/49 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880195782e0 (&tcp_ses->srv_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: compound_send_recv but task is already holding lock: ffffffffa98e66c0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire kmem_cache_alloc_trace __request_module crypto_alg_mod_lookup crypto_alloc_tfm_node crypto_alloc_shash cifs_alloc_hash smb311_crypto_shash_allocate smb311_update_preauth_hash compound_send_recv cifs_send_recv SMB2_negotiate smb2_negotiate cifs_negotiate_protocol cifs_get_smb_ses cifs_mount cifs_smb3_do_mount smb3_get_tree vfs_get_tree path_mount __x64_sys_mount do_syscall_64 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe -> #0 (&tcp_ses->srv_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire lock_acquire __mutex_lock mutex_lock_nested compound_send_recv cifs_send_recv SMB2_write smb2_sync_write cifs_write cifs_writepage_locked cifs_writepage shrink_page_list shrink_lruvec shrink_node balance_pgdat kswapd kthread ret_from_fork other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&tcp_ses->srv_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&tcp_ses->srv_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by kswapd0/49: #0: ffffffffa98e66c0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 49 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.18.0 #70 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl dump_stack print_circular_bug.cold check_noncircular __lock_acquire lock_acquire __mutex_lock mutex_lock_nested compound_send_recv cifs_send_recv SMB2_write smb2_sync_write cifs_write cifs_writepage_locked cifs_writepage shrink_page_list shrink_lruvec shrink_node balance_pgdat kswapd kthread ret_from_fork </TASK> Fix this by using the memalloc_nofs_save/restore APIs around the places where the srv_mutex is held. Do this in a wrapper function for the lock/unlock of the srv_mutex, and rename the srv_mutex to avoid missing call sites in the conversion. Note that there is another lockdep warning involving internal crypto locks, which was masked by this problem and is visible after this fix, see the discussion in this thread: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220523123755.GA13668@axis.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CANT5p=rqcYfYMVHirqvdnnca4Mo+JQSw5Qu12v=kPfpk5yhhmg@mail.gmail.com/ Reported-by: Shyam Prasad N <nspmangalore@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Lars Persson <larper@axis.com> Reviewed-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Enzo Matsumiya <ematsumiya@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
… when the system is sleeping Some channels may be masked. When the system is suspended, if these masked channels are not filtered out, this will lead to null pointer operations and system crash: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address Mem abort info: ESR = 0x0000000096000004 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000894300000 [00000000000002a0] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 989 Comm: sh Tainted: G B 6.6.0-16203-g557fb7a3ec4c-dirty #70 Hardware name: Freescale i.MX8QM MEK (DT) pstate: 400000c5 (nZcv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc: fsl_edma_disable_request+0x3c/0x78 lr: fsl_edma_disable_request+0x3c/0x78 sp:ffff800089ae7690 x29: ffff800089ae7690 x28: ffff000807ab5440 x27: ffff000807ab5830 x26: 0000000000000008 x25: 0000000000000278 x24: 0000000000000001 23: ffff000807ab4328 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: 0000000000000009 x20: ffff800082616940 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 3d3d3d3d3d3d3d3d x16: 3d3d3d3d3d3d3d3d x15: 3d3d3d3d3d3d3d3d x14: 3d3d3d3d3d3d3d3d x13: 3d3d3d3d3d3d3d3d x12: 1ffff00010d45724 x11: ffff700010d45724 x10: dfff800000000000 x9: dfff800000000000 x8: 00008fffef2ba8dc x7: 0000000000000001 x6: ffff800086a2b927 x5: ffff800086a2b920 x4: ffff700010d45725 x3: ffff8000800d5bbc x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff000800c1d880 x0 : 0000000000000001 Call trace: fsl_edma_disable_request+0x3c/0x78 fsl_edma_suspend_late+0x128/0x12c dpm_run_callback+0xd4/0x304 __device_suspend_late+0xd0/0x240 dpm_suspend_late+0x174/0x59c suspend_devices_and_enter+0x194/0xd00 pm_suspend+0x3c4/0x910 Fixes: 72f5801 ("dmaengine: fsl-edma: integrate v3 support") Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Wang <xiaolei.wang@windriver.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231113225713.1892643-2-xiaolei.wang@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
…uctions Add the following ./test_progs tests: * atomics/load_acquire * atomics/store_release * arena_atomics/load_acquire * arena_atomics/store_release They depend on the pre-defined __BPF_FEATURE_LOAD_ACQ_STORE_REL feature macro, which implies -mcpu>=v4. $ ALLOWLIST=atomics/load_acquire,atomics/store_release, $ ALLOWLIST+=arena_atomics/load_acquire,arena_atomics/store_release $ ./test_progs-cpuv4 -a $ALLOWLIST #3/9 arena_atomics/load_acquire:OK #3/10 arena_atomics/store_release:OK ... #10/8 atomics/load_acquire:OK #10/9 atomics/store_release:OK $ ./test_progs -v -a $ALLOWLIST test_load_acquire:SKIP:Clang does not support BPF load-acquire or addr_space_cast #3/9 arena_atomics/load_acquire:SKIP test_store_release:SKIP:Clang does not support BPF store-release or addr_space_cast #3/10 arena_atomics/store_release:SKIP ... test_load_acquire:SKIP:Clang does not support BPF load-acquire #10/8 atomics/load_acquire:SKIP test_store_release:SKIP:Clang does not support BPF store-release #10/9 atomics/store_release:SKIP Additionally, add several ./test_verifier tests: #65/u atomic BPF_LOAD_ACQ access through non-pointer OK #65/p atomic BPF_LOAD_ACQ access through non-pointer OK #66/u atomic BPF_STORE_REL access through non-pointer OK #66/p atomic BPF_STORE_REL access through non-pointer OK #67/u BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 8-bit OK #67/p BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 8-bit OK #68/u BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 16-bit OK #68/p BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 16-bit OK #69/u BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 32-bit OK #69/p BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 32-bit OK #70/u BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 64-bit OK #70/p BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 64-bit OK #71/u Cannot load-acquire from uninitialized src_reg OK #71/p Cannot load-acquire from uninitialized src_reg OK #76/u BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 8-bit OK #76/p BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 8-bit OK #77/u BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 16-bit OK #77/p BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 16-bit OK #78/u BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 32-bit OK #78/p BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 32-bit OK #79/u BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 64-bit OK #79/p BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 64-bit OK #80/u Cannot store-release from uninitialized src_reg OK #80/p Cannot store-release from uninitialized src_reg OK Reviewed-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <yepeilin@google.com>
Pull request for series with
subject: bpftool: bpf skeletons assert type sizes
version: 4
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=617326