-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🐛 Render dependency versions as links #1540
Conversation
9d9245e
to
17f1430
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1540 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 40.46% 40.51% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 145 145
Lines 4636 4640 +4
Branches 1088 1089 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 1876 1880 +4
Misses 2746 2746
Partials 14 14
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
provider, | ||
name, | ||
version, | ||
rule: sha, // TODO: rename to 'sha' with https://github.com/konveyor/tackle2-hub/issues/557 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM - wondering if we should hold off for the hub PR to merge?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Option 1 - hold off and update this PR at the same time
Option 2 - merge this PR and fix the payload with #1536
I'm leaning towards option 2, but it is not a strong preference.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Merging and circling back sounds ok to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested and LGTM
Both have been merged. No additional blockers for merging. |
b55b670
to
1eb6e56
Compare
Resolves: konveyor#1340 On the Dependencies page, detail drawer, applications table: render the version text as a link to the maven central repository. The link uses the dependency's sha as the key in the maven central search. Add component `ExternalLink` to standardize rendering links outside of the app opening in a new tab. Signed-off-by: Scott J Dickerson <sdickers@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott J Dickerson <sdickers@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott J Dickerson <sdickers@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott J Dickerson <sdickers@redhat.com>
1eb6e56
to
4672df5
Compare
Resolves: #1340
On the Dependencies page, detail drawer, applications table: render the version text as a link to the maven central repository. The link uses the dependency's sha as the key in the maven central search.
Add component
ExternalLink
to standardize rendering links outside of the app opening in a new tab.Note: The resolution to #1338 will require a change to the application table's query filter and response object. This will be done in PR #1536. See konveyor/tackle2-hub#557 for the response object change.
Screenshot: