Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Partial Admission] Check Mode before attempting Preemption #2809

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2024

Conversation

gabesaba
Copy link
Contributor

@gabesaba gabesaba commented Aug 9, 2024

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

We don't check RepresentativeMode before attempting preemption in the Partial Admission path. This may result in a panic, if we enter the preemption path and find some targets.

In the existing unit tests, we exit here, before encountering a panic here. See #2799 for more detail.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Related to #2799. Leaving that issue open, as related tests need to be updated

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. labels Aug 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 9, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 9, 2024

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 71b2f72
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-kueue/deploys/66b5f6effa75ff0008ff32cb
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2809--kubernetes-sigs-kueue.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@mimowo mimowo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve
I believe we should revisit the test coverage for the PartialAdmission feature as part of
#2799.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: bea9931376c9e0f949a05daff5a14ff01a159ab7

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gabesaba, mimowo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 5c4cd08 into kubernetes-sigs:main Aug 9, 2024
16 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.9 milestone Aug 9, 2024
@gabesaba gabesaba deleted the fix_panic branch August 9, 2024 12:24
@mimowo mimowo mentioned this pull request Aug 13, 2024
k8s-ci-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2024
* Cleanup to use FlavorResourceQuantities.Add in cache (#2696)

* fix: Refactor FitInCohort tests (#2655)

* fix: Refactor FitInCohorot tests

* fix: delete no-op function

* fix: use new method to add usage

* fix: to enforce resource group constraint for flavors and resources

* fix: consolidated into a single resource group

* fix: delete flavorNames

* fix: adjusted test cases to align with existing expected conditions

* fix: change FlavorResourceQuantitiesFlat value

* Finish flattening of FlavorResourceQuantities (#2721)

* Finish Flattenning FlavorResourceQuantities

* Rename FlavorResourceQuantitiesFlat to FlavorResourceQuantities

* Cleanup preemption.go (#2800)

* [Partial Admission] Check Mode before attempting Preemption (#2809)

* Prefer Reclamation to Priority Based Preemption (#2811)

---------

Co-authored-by: s-shiraki <54130718+highpon@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants