Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix dm-verity target naming format in linux guest #1338

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2022

Conversation

anmaxvl
Copy link
Contributor

@anmaxvl anmaxvl commented Mar 29, 2022

When adding layer integrity checking feature for SCSI devices,
the dm-verity device format naming was inconsistent with the
already existing pmem based verity target.
Make the naming consistent by changing verity-scsi-... to
dm-verity-scsi-....

Signed-off-by: Maksim An maksiman@microsoft.com

When adding layer integrity checking feature for SCSI devices,
the dm-verity device format naming was inconsistent with the
already existing pmem based verity target.
Make the naming consistent by changing `verity-scsi-...` to
`dm-verity-scsi-...`.

Signed-off-by: Maksim An <maksiman@microsoft.com>
@anmaxvl anmaxvl requested a review from a team as a code owner March 29, 2022 22:15
@anmaxvl anmaxvl merged commit 8c24695 into microsoft:master Mar 31, 2022
@anmaxvl anmaxvl deleted the tests/fix-layer-integrity-test branch March 31, 2022 07:24
anmaxvl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2023
princepereira pushed a commit to princepereira/hcsshim that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2024
When adding layer integrity checking feature for SCSI devices,
the dm-verity device format naming was inconsistent with the
already existing pmem based verity target.
Make the naming consistent by changing `verity-scsi-...` to
`dm-verity-scsi-...`.

Signed-off-by: Maksim An <maksiman@microsoft.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants