Fix #2378, refactor SB to support additional use cases #2381
Conversation
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CodeQL found more than 10 potential problems in the proposed changes. Check the Files changed tab for more details.
jphickey
force-pushed
the
fix-2378-sb-refactor
branch
from
4f56d7c
to
c4141f9
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CodeQL-coding-standard found more than 10 potential problems in the proposed changes. Check the Files changed tab for more details.
| * Not invoked outside of this unit | ||
| * | ||
| *-----------------------------------------------------------------*/ | ||
| void CFE_SB_MessageTxn_GetEventDetails(const CFE_SB_MessageTxn_State_t *TxnPtr, const CFE_SB_PipeSetEntry_t *ContextPtr, |
Check warning
Code scanning / CodeQL
Poorly documented large function Warning
jphickey
force-pushed
the
fix-2378-sb-refactor
branch
from
c4141f9
to
0d27889
Compare
Cleans up the internal SB implementation so it can better support future enhancements such as message integrity, additional header fields and timestamping.
jphickey
force-pushed
the
fix-2378-sb-refactor
branch
from
0d27889
to
550e7f7
Compare
|
Rebased this PR to current main branch |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CodeQL-coding-standard found more than 20 potential problems in the proposed changes. Check the Files changed tab for more details.
jphickey
force-pushed
the
fix-2378-sb-refactor
branch
from
550e7f7
to
f20e60a
Compare
|
The unused variable static analysis warning is fixed, but code coverage is now complaining. The "missed branches" that it is reporting are mostly due to the fact that the |
jphickey
force-pushed
the
fix-2378-sb-refactor
branch
2 times, most recently
from
329695d
to
ea02a67
Compare
|
Most "switch" cases now fixed (code coverage-wise) by adding a default case that does nothing, and always going through it. Looking at other modules there are still some code coverage lines that could potentially be fixed up before merging. |
Restructure some switch statements and add a "default" case so they are not flagged as having a missing branch in the coverage test.
jphickey
force-pushed
the
fix-2378-sb-refactor
branch
from
ea02a67
to
48dd153
Compare
|
CCB 2 May 2024: Approved pending BVT run. |
*Combines:* cFE equuleus-rc1+dev141 osal equuleus-rc1+dev66 PSP equuleus-rc1+dev42 **Includes:** *cFS* - #751 - #762 *cFE* - nasa/cFE#2537 - nasa/cFE#2381 - nasa/cFE#2551 *osal* - nasa/osal#1460 *PSP* - nasa/PSP#430 Co-authored by: Justin Figueroa <chillfig@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored by: Joseph Hickey <jphickey@users.noreply.github.com>
dzbaker
added
CCB:Approved
Checklist (Please check before submitting)
Describe the contribution
Cleans up the internal SB implementation so it can better support future enhancements such as message integrity, additional header fields and timestamping.
Fixes #2378
Testing performed
Full suite of tests on SB implementation
Expected behavior changes
API behavior is preserved, fully backward compatible
System(s) tested on
Debian
Additional context
Replaces #2367 based on code review and discussion. This PR represents the refactoring change, along with some other refinements. The routing change will be a separate PR.
Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Joseph Hickey, Vantage Systems, Inc.