-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 879
Expect input of prefixes to KrakenUniq #6912
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -25,6 +25,11 @@ input: | |
type: file | ||
description: List of input files containing sequences. All of them must be either | ||
in FASTA or FASTQ format. | ||
- prefixes: | ||
type: string | ||
description: > | ||
List of sample identifiers or filename prefixes. Must correspond in order and | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Maybe give a suggestio how to fix the order (maybe with There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think that in the normal case, prefixes will be constructed from samples as they come out of a channel and thus they will be in the same order. I do not want to suggest something here that potentially makes the use more complicated than necessary and potentially leads to user errors. I am in favor of creating a batching function and having that properly tested, but I don't know where we would provide that from? |
||
length to the 'sequences', or to the number of sequencing pairs. | ||
- - sequence_type: | ||
type: string | ||
description: Format of all given sequencing files as literal string, either | ||
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.