-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 191
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dev -> Master for v2.9 #2349
Dev -> Master for v2.9 #2349
Conversation
…h only one revision.
… the new ability to download multiple revisions at once. This resulted in loooooooong filenames.
…load. Ultimately, this now means that I also have to implement multiple version downloads for the classic download. Just downloading the first doesn't seem to make sense from a UX perspective.
…link from singularity to apptainer on the system.
Co-authored-by: Matthias Hörtenhuber <mashehu@users.noreply.github.com>
… to Version 2.9dev.
…n showing it separately.
Fix readme images from rich-codex
Co-authored-by: Júlia Mir Pedrol <mirp.julia@gmail.com>
rich-codex remove modules repo folder before clone
add apptainer.registry
…imum to possibly support a future apptainer.registry notation.
README.md
Outdated
@@ -1181,7 +1181,7 @@ The `nf-core subworkflows create` command will prompt you with the relevant ques | |||
|
|||
<!-- RICH-CODEX | |||
working_dir: tmp | |||
before_command: git clone https://github.com/nf-core/modules.git && cd modules | |||
before_command: rm -rf ~/.config/nfcore/nf-core/modules && git clone https://github.com/nf-core/modules.git && cd modules |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
before_command: rm -rf ~/.config/nfcore/nf-core/modules && git clone https://github.com/nf-core/modules.git && cd modules | |
before_command: cd modules |
We don't have to clone the repo again, it should already be there from the modules commands before (instead of cd
we could remove the whole before_command
and have working_dir: tmp/modules
Revert "rich-codex remove modules repo folder before clone"
don't clone modules repo again
remove cd modules
Co-authored-by: Júlia Mir Pedrol <mirp.julia@gmail.com>
Add markdown hint to modules template
…ontainer strings This is needed, should the keyword "apptainer" start to pop up in DSL2 container definitions.
@@ -3,6 +3,6 @@ | |||
Shouldn't do much, as everything is under subcommands. | |||
""" | |||
|
|||
import pkg_resources | |||
import importlib.metadata as importlib_metadata |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Admittedly, I am newly using pkg_resources in Downloads:
from pkg_resources import parse_version as VersionParser
It is just something I came by when searching for suggestions online how to reliably sort semantic versions correctly. I am open to change that, in case dropping pkg_resources is desired?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we need to drop it, but can think about it if there's a better solution :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So far, I am just aware that distutils is deprecated, which I had used initially before switching to pkg_resources
. So is importlib
the new thing to use (at least for tools)?
No description provided.